StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Cloud Monitoring
  5. Amazon CloudWatch vs Fluentd

Amazon CloudWatch vs Fluentd

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
Stacks12.0K
Followers8.2K
Votes214
Fluentd
Fluentd
Stacks630
Followers688
Votes39
GitHub Stars13.4K
Forks1.4K

Amazon CloudWatch vs Fluentd: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Amazon CloudWatch and Fluentd

Amazon CloudWatch and Fluentd are two popular monitoring and logging tools used in the field of cloud computing. While both serve the purpose of monitoring and collecting logs, they have distinct differences that set them apart.

  1. Data Collection and Integration: Amazon CloudWatch is a fully managed monitoring service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS). It provides comprehensive monitoring of resources and applications within the AWS ecosystem. It collects and aggregates data from various sources, including AWS services, custom applications, and on-premises resources. On the other hand, Fluentd is an open-source data collector that can collect logs and data from a variety of sources, including various applications, containers, and cloud platforms.

  2. Flexibility and Customizability: CloudWatch offers a wide range of default metrics and logging capabilities for AWS services, making it easy to monitor and analyze data within the AWS environment. However, its flexibility is somewhat limited when it comes to collecting logs and metrics from non-AWS resources. In contrast, Fluentd provides a more flexible and customizable approach to log collection and data integration. It supports various plugins and configurations, allowing users to collect and process logs from different sources based on their specific requirements.

  3. Data Scaling and Performance: CloudWatch is designed to handle large amounts of data generated within the AWS environment, providing automatic scalability and high performance for monitoring and metric collection. It efficiently handles the scaling of resources and can accommodate bursts of data. On the other hand, Fluentd is a lightweight and efficient data collector that can process high volumes of data in real-time. It is known for its ability to handle large-scale data collection and provide high throughput performance.

  4. Alerting and Notification: CloudWatch offers robust alerting and notification capabilities, allowing users to set up alarms based on predefined metrics or custom metrics. It can send notifications via various channels like email, SMS, and Amazon SNS. In contrast, Fluentd primarily focuses on log collection and data integration, and does not provide built-in alerting capabilities. However, Fluentd can be integrated with other tools or services to enable alerting and notification based on specific log patterns.

  5. Integration with AWS Ecosystem: CloudWatch seamlessly integrates with other AWS services and can collect metrics and logs from various AWS resources, such as EC2 instances, Lambda functions, and RDS databases. It provides native integration and visualizations for AWS services, making it easy to monitor and analyze their performance. Fluentd, being an open-source tool, can also integrate with AWS services using plugins or custom configurations. However, it might require additional setup and configuration compared to CloudWatch.

  6. Pricing Model: CloudWatch has a tiered pricing model based on the number of metrics, API requests, and log data volume. It offers a free tier with limited features and usage. On the other hand, Fluentd is an open-source tool and does not have any direct cost associated with it. However, users might incur costs for the infrastructure or resources required to run Fluentd, depending on their deployment setup.

In summary, Amazon CloudWatch is a comprehensive monitoring service tailored for AWS resources, offering easy integration, scalability, and robust alerting capabilities. On the other hand, Fluentd is a flexible and customizable data collector that can gather logs and data from various sources beyond the AWS ecosystem, with high scalability and a lightweight architecture.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
Fluentd
Fluentd

It helps you gain system-wide visibility into resource utilization, application performance, and operational health. It retrieve your monitoring data, view graphs to help take automated action based on the state of your cloud environment.

Fluentd collects events from various data sources and writes them to files, RDBMS, NoSQL, IaaS, SaaS, Hadoop and so on. Fluentd helps you unify your logging infrastructure.

Basic Monitoring for Amazon EC2 instances: ten pre-selected metrics at five-minute frequency, free of charge.;Detailed Monitoring for Amazon EC2 instances: seven pre-selected metrics at one-minute frequency, for an additional charge.;Amazon EBS volumes: eight pre-selected metrics at five-minute frequency, free of charge.;Elastic Load Balancers: thirteen pre-selected metrics at one-minute frequency, free of charge.;Amazon RDS DB instances: thirteen pre-selected metrics at one-minute frequency, free of charge.;Amazon SQS queues: eight pre-selected metrics at five-minute frequency, free of charge.;Amazon SNS topics: four pre-selected metrics at five-minute frequency, free of charge.;Amazon ElastiCache nodes: twenty-nine pre-selected metrics at one-minute frequency, free of charge.;Amazon DynamoDB tables: seven pre-selected metrics at five-minute frequency, free of charge.;AWS Storage Gateways: eleven pre-selected gateway metrics and five pre-selected storage volume metrics at five-minute frequency, free of charge.;Amazon Elastic MapReduce job flows: twenty-three pre-selected metrics at five-minute frequency, free of charge.;Auto Scaling groups: seven pre-selected metrics at one-minute frequency, optional and charged at standard pricing.;Estimated charges on your AWS bill: you can also choose to enable metrics to monitor your AWS charges. The number of metrics depends on the AWS products and services that you use, and these metrics are free of charge. Learn more about this option.
Open source; Flexible; Minimum resources; Reliable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
13.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.4K
Stacks
12.0K
Stacks
630
Followers
8.2K
Followers
688
Votes
214
Votes
39
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 76
    Monitor aws resources
  • 46
    Zero setup
  • 30
    Detailed Monitoring
  • 23
    Backed by Amazon
  • 19
    Auto Scaling groups
Cons
  • 2
    Poor Search Capabilities
Pros
  • 11
    Open-source
  • 10
    Great for Kubernetes node container log forwarding
  • 9
    Lightweight
  • 9
    Easy

What are some alternatives to Amazon CloudWatch, Fluentd?

Papertrail

Papertrail

Papertrail helps detect, resolve, and avoid infrastructure problems using log messages. Papertrail's practicality comes from our own experience as sysadmins, developers, and entrepreneurs.

Logmatic

Logmatic

Get a clear overview of what is happening across your distributed environments, and spot the needle in the haystack in no time. Build dynamic analyses and identify improvements for your software, your user experience and your business.

Loggly

Loggly

It is a SaaS solution to manage your log data. There is nothing to install and updates are automatically applied to your Loggly subdomain.

Logentries

Logentries

Logentries makes machine-generated log data easily accessible to IT operations, development, and business analysis teams of all sizes. With the broadest platform support and an open API, Logentries brings the value of log-level data to any system, to any team member, and to a community of more than 25,000 worldwide users.

Logstash

Logstash

Logstash is a tool for managing events and logs. You can use it to collect logs, parse them, and store them for later use (like, for searching). If you store them in Elasticsearch, you can view and analyze them with Kibana.

Graylog

Graylog

Centralize and aggregate all your log files for 100% visibility. Use our powerful query language to search through terabytes of log data to discover and analyze important information.

Stackdriver

Stackdriver

Google Stackdriver provides powerful monitoring, logging, and diagnostics. It equips you with insight into the health, performance, and availability of cloud-powered applications, enabling you to find and fix issues faster.

Sematext

Sematext

Sematext pulls together performance monitoring, logs, user experience and synthetic monitoring that tools organizations need to troubleshoot performance issues faster.

Lumigo

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

ELK

ELK

It is the acronym for three open source projects: Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana. Elasticsearch is a search and analytics engine. Logstash is a server‑side data processing pipeline that ingests data from multiple sources simultaneously, transforms it, and then sends it to a "stash" like Elasticsearch. Kibana lets users visualize data with charts and graphs in Elasticsearch.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana