Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon DynamoDB vs Firebase: What are the differences?
Introduction: Amazon DynamoDB and Firebase are two popular NoSQL databases used for building scalable applications. Both platforms offer various features and capabilities, but they also have distinct differences that set them apart.
Data Modeling and Querying: Amazon DynamoDB uses a schema-less design that allows for flexible data modeling. It also provides powerful querying capabilities with support for secondary indexes. On the other hand, Firebase follows a more structured data model with a JSON-based database that simplifies data storage but may limit complex querying capabilities compared to DynamoDB.
Scalability and Performance: Amazon DynamoDB is designed to handle large-scale applications with seamless scalability and high-performance throughput. It offers automatic partitioning and replication of data to handle high traffic loads efficiently. In contrast, Firebase is known for its real-time database that excels in handling concurrent connections and updates, making it a preferred choice for applications requiring real-time updates.
Pricing Model: Amazon DynamoDB follows a pay-per-request pricing model where you only pay for the read and write requests made to the database. It also offers provisioned throughput capacity to optimize costs based on expected traffic. Firebase, on the other hand, follows a usage-based pricing model that charges based on storage, data transfer, and online users, which can be beneficial for smaller applications with fluctuating traffic.
Integration with Other Services: Amazon DynamoDB seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like Lambda, S3, and API Gateway, enabling developers to build complex serverless architectures easily. Firebase, on the contrary, is tightly integrated with Google Cloud services like Cloud Functions, Authentication, and Hosting, providing a unified platform for developing and deploying applications.
Mobile Development Support: Firebase is widely recognized for its robust support for mobile app development, offering features like authentication, real-time database, cloud messaging, and app indexing. It provides SDKs for various platforms, simplifying the integration process for mobile developers. While DynamoDB can also be used for mobile app development, Firebase's dedicated focus on mobile-related features sets it apart in this aspect.
Data Storage Limits: Amazon DynamoDB imposes limits on the size of individual items and total storage capacity based on the selected pricing plan. Firebase, however, provides a generous limit on the amount of data that can be stored and synced in real-time across devices, making it suitable for applications with large datasets and frequent data updates.
In Summary, Amazon DynamoDB excels in scalability and flexible querying capabilities, making it ideal for large-scale applications, while Firebase stands out for its real-time capabilities, mobile development support, and user-friendly pricing model, making it a preferred choice for real-time applications and smaller projects requiring rapid development.
We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.
I would recommend looking hard into Firebase
for this project, especially if you do not have dedicated full-stack or backend members on your team.
The real time database, as you mentioned, is a great option, but I would also look into Firestore
. Similar to RTDB, it adds more functions and some cool methods as well. Also, another great thing about Firebase is you have easy access to storage and dead simple auth as well.
Node.js
Express
MongoDB
Socket.IO
and Apollo
are great technologies as well, and may be the better option if you do not wish to cede as much control to third parties in your application.
Overall, I say if you wish to focus more time developing your React
application instead of other parts of your stack, Firebase
is a great way to do that.
Hello Noam 👋,
I suggest taking a look at Ably, it has all the realtime features you need and the platform is designed to guarantee critical functionality at scale.
Here is an in depth comparison between Ably and Firebase
Hey Noam,
I would recommend you to take a look into 8base. It has features you've requested, also relation database and GraphQL API which will help you to develop rapidly.
Thanks, Ilya
Pros of Amazon DynamoDB
- Predictable performance and cost62
- Scalable56
- Native JSON Support35
- AWS Free Tier21
- Fast7
- No sql3
- To store data3
- Serverless2
- No Stored procedures is GOOD2
- ORM with DynamoDBMapper1
- Elastic Scalability using on-demand mode1
- Elastic Scalability using autoscaling1
- DynamoDB Stream1
Pros of Firebase
- Realtime backend made easy371
- Fast and responsive270
- Easy setup242
- Real-time215
- JSON191
- Free134
- Backed by google128
- Angular adaptor83
- Reliable68
- Great customer support36
- Great documentation32
- Real-time synchronization25
- Mobile friendly21
- Rapid prototyping19
- Great security14
- Automatic scaling12
- Freakingly awesome11
- Super fast development8
- Angularfire is an amazing addition!8
- Chat8
- Firebase hosting6
- Built in user auth/oauth6
- Awesome next-gen backend6
- Ios adaptor6
- Speed of light4
- Very easy to use4
- Great3
- It's made development super fast3
- Brilliant for startups3
- Free hosting2
- Cloud functions2
- JS Offline and Sync suport2
- Low battery consumption2
- .net2
- The concurrent updates create a great experience2
- Push notification2
- I can quickly create static web apps with no backend2
- Great all-round functionality2
- Free authentication solution2
- Easy Reactjs integration1
- Google's support1
- Free SSL1
- CDN & cache out of the box1
- Easy to use1
- Large1
- Faster workflow1
- Serverless1
- Good Free Limits1
- Simple and easy1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon DynamoDB
- Only sequential access for paginate data4
- Scaling1
- Document Limit Size1
Cons of Firebase
- Can become expensive31
- No open source, you depend on external company16
- Scalability is not infinite15
- Not Flexible Enough9
- Cant filter queries7
- Very unstable server3
- No Relational Data3
- Too many errors2
- No offline sync2