Amazon EFS vs Dropbox

Overview

Dropbox

Stacks23.5K

Followers18.4K

Votes1.7K

Amazon EFS

Stacks98

Followers92

Votes0

Amazon EFS vs Dropbox: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Scalability: Amazon EFS is highly scalable, allowing users to increase storage capacity without any impact on performance, making it suitable for growing businesses. On the other hand, Dropbox has limitations on storage capacity, which can affect users with large amounts of data to store and access.
Security: Amazon EFS offers advanced security features such as encryption at rest and in transit, access control policies, and network isolation. In contrast, Dropbox provides encryption, but users have less control over security measures compared to Amazon EFS, raising concerns for sensitive data storage.
Integration with Other Services: Amazon EFS seamlessly integrates with other AWS services, facilitating data storage and sharing between different applications within the AWS ecosystem. Dropbox, while being a stand-alone service, has limited integration capabilities with other third-party services, limiting its versatility in a multi-application environment.
Performance: Amazon EFS provides consistent performance levels even with large file systems and high levels of I/O, ensuring reliable access to data. Dropbox, on the other hand, may experience performance issues when handling large files or during peak usage times, impacting user experience.
Cost Structure: Amazon EFS follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, allowing users to pay only for the storage used without any upfront costs, making it cost-effective for businesses with fluctuating storage needs. Dropbox, on the other hand, offers fixed-tier pricing plans, which may result in higher costs for users with varying storage requirements.
Collaboration Features: Dropbox is primarily known for its collaboration tools, such as shared folders and document editing features, making it a preferred choice for teams working on shared files. While Amazon EFS provides basic file sharing capabilities, it lacks the comprehensive collaboration features offered by Dropbox for team workflows.

In Summary, when comparing Amazon EFS and Dropbox, the key differences lie in scalability, security, integration, performance, cost structure, and collaboration features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Dropbox	Amazon EFS
Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more.	Amazon EFS is easy to use and offers a simple interface that allows you to create and configure file systems quickly and easily. With Amazon EFS, storage capacity is elastic, growing and shrinking automatically as you add and remove files.
Dropbox Chooser- Get files from Dropbox into your web app with just a few lines of JavaScript;Sync API- Read and write to Dropbox from iOS & Android as if it were a local filesystem;Core API- The basics. Upload, download, search, and more from your web or mobile app	-
Statistics
Stacks 23.5K	Stacks 98
Followers 18.4K	Followers 92
Votes 1.7K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 434 Easy to work with 256 Free 216 Popular 176 Shared file hosting 167 'just works' Cons 3 Personal vs company account is confusing 1 Replication kills CPU and battery	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Formstack Squarespace Trello LiveChat RightSignature Asana	Amazon EC2 Amazon VPC AWS Direct Connect

What are some alternatives to Dropbox, Amazon EFS?

Google Drive

Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer.

Box

The Box API gives you access to the content management features you see in our web app and lets you extend them for use in your own app. It strives to be RESTful and is organized around the main resources you’re familiar with from the Box web interface.

Nextcloud

A suite of client-server software for creating and using file hosting services The most deployed self-hosted file share and collaboration platform on the web. Access & collaborate across your devices.

ceph

In computing,It is a free-software storage platform, implements object storage on a single distributed computer cluster, and provides interfaces for object-, block- and file-level storage.

Microsoft SharePoint

It empowers teamwork with dynamic and productive team sites for every project team, department, and division. Share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and seamlessly collaborate across the organization.

OneDrive

Outlook.com is a free, personal email service from Microsoft. Keep your inbox clutter-free with powerful organizational tools, and collaborate easily with OneDrive and Office Online integration.

Dropmark

Dropmark offers super simple drag-and-drop file sharing, like a number of web apps before it, but if you want to use it for more you can create presentations, slideshows, and collaborate with others just as easily.

Alfresco

Alfresco Platform is an open, modern and secure system that intelligently activates process and content to accelerate the flow of business.

Streem

Unlike other cloud storage tools, Streem takes up no space on your computer, but still gives you instant access to your files without any lag. All media on Streem is converted on-the-fly so you can access it seamlessly regardless of the device or bandwidth.

ownCloud

It is an open source, self-hosted file sync and share app platform. Access & sync your files, contacts, calendars & bookmarks across your devices. You decide what happens with your data, where it is and who can access it.

Related Comparisons

Amazon EFS vs Dropbox: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Scalability: Amazon EFS is highly scalable, allowing users to increase storage capacity without any impact on performance, making it suitable for growing businesses. On the other hand, Dropbox has limitations on storage capacity, which can affect users with large amounts of data to store and access.
Security: Amazon EFS offers advanced security features such as encryption at rest and in transit, access control policies, and network isolation. In contrast, Dropbox provides encryption, but users have less control over security measures compared to Amazon EFS, raising concerns for sensitive data storage.
Integration with Other Services: Amazon EFS seamlessly integrates with other AWS services, facilitating data storage and sharing between different applications within the AWS ecosystem. Dropbox, while being a stand-alone service, has limited integration capabilities with other third-party services, limiting its versatility in a multi-application environment.
Performance: Amazon EFS provides consistent performance levels even with large file systems and high levels of I/O, ensuring reliable access to data. Dropbox, on the other hand, may experience performance issues when handling large files or during peak usage times, impacting user experience.
Cost Structure: Amazon EFS follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, allowing users to pay only for the storage used without any upfront costs, making it cost-effective for businesses with fluctuating storage needs. Dropbox, on the other hand, offers fixed-tier pricing plans, which may result in higher costs for users with varying storage requirements.
Collaboration Features: Dropbox is primarily known for its collaboration tools, such as shared folders and document editing features, making it a preferred choice for teams working on shared files. While Amazon EFS provides basic file sharing capabilities, it lacks the comprehensive collaboration features offered by Dropbox for team workflows.

In Summary, when comparing Amazon EFS and Dropbox, the key differences lie in scalability, security, integration, performance, cost structure, and collaboration features.

Amazon EFS vs Dropbox

Overview