Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon ElastiCache vs Hazelcast: What are the differences?
Introduction
Amazon ElastiCache and Hazelcast are both popular in-memory data caching solutions that provide high performance and scalability for applications. However, there are key differences between these two technologies that make them suitable for different use cases.
Data Persistence: Amazon ElastiCache supports data persistence to Amazon S3, allowing you to store cache data even when the cache cluster is restarted. Hazelcast, on the other hand, does not provide built-in data persistence mechanisms.
Cloud Support: Amazon ElastiCache is a fully managed service provided by AWS, which means it is tightly integrated with other AWS services and is highly scalable. In contrast, Hazelcast can be deployed on-premises or in various cloud environments, offering more flexibility in terms of deployment options.
Ease of Use: Amazon ElastiCache offers a simple and intuitive API that makes it easy to integrate with applications running on AWS. It also provides seamless integration with other AWS services, such as Amazon CloudWatch for monitoring and AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) for access control. Hazelcast, while also having a user-friendly interface, may require more configuration and setup for integration with different environments.
Language Support: Amazon ElastiCache is optimized for Java applications and provides native language clients for Java, .NET, Python, Ruby, Node.js, and PHP. Hazelcast, on the other hand, supports a wider range of programming languages including Java, .NET, C++, Python, Node.js, and more, making it more versatile for developers using different language stacks.
Cluster Management: Amazon ElastiCache offers automatic cluster management, allowing you to easily scale your cache cluster up or down and handle node failures without manual intervention. Hazelcast also supports cluster management features, but it may require more configuration and monitoring from the user's side.
Pricing Model: Amazon ElastiCache has a pay-as-you-go pricing model, which charges you based on the size and number of cache nodes you use. Hazelcast, on the other hand, offers both open-source and enterprise versions, with the enterprise version providing additional features and support but requiring a subscription.
In summary, Amazon ElastiCache is a fully managed service provided by AWS with built-in data persistence and tight integration with other AWS services. It is optimized for Java applications and offers simple cluster management. Hazelcast, on the other hand, is more versatile in terms of language support, allowing developers to choose from a wider range of programming languages and deployment options. It is suitable for both on-premises and cloud environments but may require more configuration and setup compared to Amazon ElastiCache.
Pros of Amazon ElastiCache
- Redis58
- High-performance32
- Backed by amazon26
- Memcached21
- Elastic14
Pros of Hazelcast
- High Availibility11
- Distributed Locking6
- Distributed compute6
- Sharding5
- Load balancing4
- Map-reduce functionality3
- Simple-to-use3
- Written in java. runs on jvm3
- Publish-subscribe3
- Sql query support in cluster wide3
- Optimis locking for map2
- Performance2
- Multiple client language support2
- Rest interface2
- Admin Interface (Management Center)1
- Better Documentation1
- Easy to use1
- Super Fast1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon ElastiCache
Cons of Hazelcast
- License needed for SSL4
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Amazon ElastiCache?
What is Hazelcast?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Hazelcast?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Amazon ElastiCache?
What tools integrate with Hazelcast?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+42
+30
+27
+35
+29