StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. Apache Cordova vs Crosswalk

Apache Cordova vs Crosswalk

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Cordova
Apache Cordova
Stacks686
Followers892
Votes218
GitHub Stars955
Forks345
Crosswalk
Crosswalk
Stacks16
Followers34
Votes6
GitHub Stars2.3K
Forks651

Apache Cordova vs Crosswalk: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Apache Cordova and Crosswalk

Apache Cordova and Crosswalk are both popular frameworks used for developing hybrid mobile applications. While they share some similarities, there are several key differences between them.

  1. Runtime Environment: Apache Cordova utilizes a WebView component provided by the native operating system to render the application's HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, whereas Crosswalk uses its own embedded runtime environment powered by the Chromium browser engine. This allows Crosswalk to provide better HTML5 and CSS3 support and improved performance compared to Cordova.

  2. Performance: Crosswalk's standalone runtime environment ensures consistent performance across different devices and operating systems, regardless of the native WebView versions. On the other hand, Cordova's performance relies on the underlying WebView, which may vary depending on the platform and device, potentially resulting in performance inconsistencies.

  3. Web Engine Features: Crosswalk incorporates the latest Chromium browser engine features, which includes support for the latest web standards, advanced APIs, and performance optimizations. Cordova, being dependent on the device's WebView, may lack support for certain HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript features, limiting the capabilities of the hybrid applications.

  4. Customization and Control: Cordova provides more flexibility and customization options as it allows developers to interact directly with the device's native APIs through plugins. This enables the integration of native functionality seamlessly into the hybrid applications. Crosswalk, on the other hand, limits direct access to native APIs, offering a more standardized development environment, but potentially limiting the scope of functionality that can be achieved.

  5. App Size: Due to its embedded runtime environment, Crosswalk tends to have a larger application size compared to Cordova. This is because Crosswalk includes the whole Chromium browser engine along with the application code, resulting in a bigger download size for users. Cordova, being dependent on the native WebView, relies on the already-present components on the device and has a smaller application size.

  6. Compatibility: Cordova offers broader platform compatibility as it supports a wide range of platforms, including iOS, Android, Windows, and more. Crosswalk, although versatile, has limited platform support, primarily focusing on Android, making it a preferred choice for Android-specific application development.

In summary, Apache Cordova and Crosswalk differ in their runtime environment, performance, web engine features, customization options, app size, and platform compatibility. These differences should be considered when choosing the appropriate framework for developing hybrid mobile applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache Cordova, Crosswalk

Gabor
Gabor

CTO at momento.

Aug 23, 2021

Decided

As a startup, we need the maximum flexibility and the ability to reach our customers in a more suitable way. So a hybrid application approach is the best because it allows you to develop a cross-platform application in a unique codebase. The choice behind Ionic is Angular, I think that angular is the best framework to develop a complex application that needs a lot of service interaction, its modularity forces you (the developer) to write the code in the correct way, so it can be maintainable and reusable.

209k views209k
Comments
Jan
Jan

Jan 24, 2022

Decided

I wanted to develop a student app that possibly could be used by many teams (students from other schools)

I chose Ionic, because:

  • single codebase: previously, we used React Native for Android and Angular for web/PWA, which was troublesome

  • portability: runs on PWA (which is important, because iOS license is too expensive for school app), web, Android iOS (+ others, if needed)

  • full use of web technologies: Next.js, Tailwind, React in this example (in oppose to Flutter/Java/Kotlin)

  • stability and maintainability: low-entry level due to basic web technologies without new syntax (in oppose to React Native and Flutter), web is really stable and won't lose support (which doesn't have to be true with Flutter/Dart)

106k views106k
Comments
Jesús
Jesús

Nov 29, 2022

Needs adviceonWordPressWordPressReact NativeReact Native

I would like to evaluate a good option to migrate an existing WordPress portal, where the customer can continue to access the news and also have a private area where they can receive personalised information and can demand or interact with the company and also have mobile support on both iOS and Android.

Currently the whole back system is in SAP and my main doubts are;

  • Best solution for the web portal that can generate content and can render well in the mobile solution.
  • Best option for the mobile implementation of the same portal and its private area ( @{React Native}|tool:2699|?)
20.1k views20.1k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Cordova
Apache Cordova
Crosswalk
Crosswalk

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Crosswalk is a web runtime for ambitious HTML5 applications. All the features of a modern browser, deep device integration and an API for adding native extensions

Cross-platform (CLI) workflow;Platform-centered workflow;Hundreds of plugins
Develop around device fragmentation;Provide a feature rich experience on all Android 4.x devices;Easily debug with Chrome DevTools;Improve the performance of your HTML, CSS, and JavaScript
Statistics
GitHub Stars
955
GitHub Stars
2.3K
GitHub Forks
345
GitHub Forks
651
Stacks
686
Stacks
16
Followers
892
Followers
34
Votes
218
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 48
    Lots of plugins
  • 35
    JavaScript
  • 26
    Great community
  • 25
    Easy Development
  • 18
    Easy to learn
Cons
  • 2
    No native performance
  • 1
    Hard to install
  • 0
    Hard to install
Pros
  • 2
    Essential for Android hybrid apps
  • 1
    Pretty decent solution to Android WebView issues
  • 1
    Improved performance
  • 1
    Hybrid desktop apps
  • 1
    New Modern Cordova
Integrations
No integrations available
Android SDK
Android SDK

What are some alternatives to Apache Cordova, Crosswalk?

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Framework7

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Qt

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Expo

Expo

It is a framework and a platform for universal React applications. It is a set of tools and services built around React Native and native platforms that help you develop, build, deploy, and quickly iterate on iOS, Android, and web apps.

Vue Native

Vue Native

Vue Native is a mobile framework to build truly native mobile app using Vue.js. Its is designed to connect React Native and Vue.js. Vue Native is a wrapper around React Native APIs, which allows you to use Vue.js and compose rich mobile User Interface.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase