Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apache HTTP Server vs XAMPP: What are the differences?
Apache HTTP Server and XAMPP are both popular web server solutions used for hosting websites and web applications. Let's explore the key differences between them.
Installation and Configuration: Apache HTTP Server is a standalone web server that requires manual installation and configuration. On the other hand, XAMPP is a software package that includes Apache HTTP Server along with other components such as MySQL, PHP, and Perl. XAMPP provides an easy-to-use installer that simplifies the installation and configuration process.
Platform Compatibility: Apache HTTP Server is compatible with a wide range of operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and macOS. XAMPP, on the other hand, is primarily designed for Windows-based systems, although it does offer versions for macOS and Linux as well.
Features and Components: Apache HTTP Server offers a core set of features that can be extended using modules. XAMPP, on the other hand, includes additional components such as MySQL, PHP, and Perl out of the box, making it a more convenient option for developers who require a complete web development stack.
Ease of Use: XAMPP is designed to be user-friendly and beginner-friendly, providing an intuitive control panel for managing the web server and its components. Apache HTTP Server, on the other hand, requires more technical expertise for installation and configuration, making it a better choice for experienced users who require more customization options.
Security: Apache HTTP Server is widely acknowledged for its robust security features and has a large community of developers who regularly release security updates and patches. XAMPP, while secure, may require additional configuration and precautions to ensure the security of the web server and its components.
Development Environment: XAMPP is often used as a development environment, providing developers with an all-in-one solution for testing and deploying web applications. Apache HTTP Server, on the other hand, is commonly used in production environments and may require additional configuration for development purposes.
In summary, Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and widely-used open-source web server software that enables hosting and serving websites and web applications on various platforms, providing features like HTTP/HTTPS support, virtual hosting, and modular architecture for extensibility. XAMPP, on the other hand, is an open-source cross-platform web server solution that bundles Apache HTTP Server with other tools like MySQL, PHP, and Perl, offering a complete development environment for building and testing web applications locally on a single machine.
I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!
I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.
From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."
I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.
I use nginx because its more flexible and easy to configure
I use Apache HTTP Server because it's intuitive, comprehensive, well-documented, and just works
I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to 1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly. 2. Install apache and tomcat. 3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server. 4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports. 5. Create users on RHEL for application support team. 6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.
I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.
Pros of Apache HTTP Server
- Web server479
- Most widely-used web server305
- Virtual hosting217
- Fast148
- Ssl support138
- Since 199644
- Asynchronous28
- Robust5
- Proven over many years4
- Mature2
- Perfomance2
- Perfect Support1
- Many available modules0
- Many available modules0
Pros of XAMPP
- Easy set up and installation of files6
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Apache HTTP Server
- Hard to set up4
