Overview

Apache HTTP Server

Stacks64.9K

Followers22.8K

Votes1.4K

GitHub Stars3.8K

Forks1.2K

Zope

Stacks120

Followers14

Votes1

GitHub Stars377

Forks106

Apache HTTP Server vs Zope: What are the differences?

# Introduction

1. **Configuration**: Apache HTTP Server uses a text-based configuration file, making it more straightforward for users to make changes and manage settings. In contrast, Zope utilizes a web-based management interface for configuration, providing a more user-friendly approach but limiting advanced customization options.
2. **Modularity**: Apache HTTP Server is modular, allowing users to add or remove modules as needed to customize functionality. On the other hand, Zope is more monolithic in nature, with a built-in set of features that cannot be easily extended or modified.
3. **Language Support**: Apache HTTP Server primarily works with server-side scripting languages like PHP, Perl, and Python for web application development. In contrast, Zope is specifically designed to work with the Python programming language, providing tighter integration and optimization for Python-based web projects.
4. **Scalability**: Apache HTTP Server is known for its scalability, making it suitable for handling high traffic websites and large volumes of requests. Zope, while capable of handling moderate traffic, may not be as scalable as Apache in terms of performance under heavy loads.
5. **Community Support**: Apache HTTP Server has a vast community of developers and users, providing extensive documentation, support forums, and resources for troubleshooting and optimization. Zope, while supported by a dedicated user base, may not have the same level of community support and resources available.
6. **Use Cases**: Apache HTTP Server is widely used for hosting websites, serving as a generic web server for various types of web applications. Zope, on the other hand, is more specialized for content management systems and complex web applications that require advanced object-oriented programming capabilities.

In Summary, Apache HTTP Server and Zope differ in configuration methods, modularity, language support, scalability, community support, and preferred use cases, making each better suited for specific types of web projects.

🔥 Trending in Platform as a Service on StackShare

Daytona Platform As A Service

The open source development environment manager

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

6

Advice on Apache HTTP Server, Zope

Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
Install apache and tomcat.
Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
Create users on RHEL for application support team.
other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k

Comments

greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k

Comments

StackShare

May 29, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

725k views725k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache HTTP Server	Zope
The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.	It is a family of free and open-source web application servers written in Python, and their associated online community. It stands for "Z Object Publishing Environment", and was the first system using the now common object publishing methodology for the Web
-	Easy to use; Specific; Reusable
Statistics
GitHub Stars 3.8K	GitHub Stars 377
GitHub Forks 1.2K	GitHub Forks 106
Stacks 64.9K	Stacks 120
Followers 22.8K	Followers 14
Votes 1.4K	Votes 1
Pros & Cons
Pros 479 Web server 305 Most widely-used web server 217 Virtual hosting 148 Fast 138 Ssl support Cons 4 Hard to set up	Pros 1 For using Plone CMS
Integrations
No integrations available	Python EasyEngine Plesk Scalyr Datadog Tarantool OpenResty

What are some alternatives to Apache HTTP Server, Zope?

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.