StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Beta Testing Mobile App Distribution
  5. Apperian vs TestFairy

Apperian vs TestFairy

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TestFairy
TestFairy
Stacks41
Followers76
Votes29
Apperian
Apperian
Stacks1
Followers1
Votes0

Apperian vs TestFairy: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key differences between Apperian and TestFairy:

1. **Feature Set**: Apperian provides a comprehensive enterprise app management platform with capabilities like app distribution, security policies, app analytics, and user feedback. While TestFairy focuses more on app testing and monitoring, offering features like crash reporting, video recordings of user sessions, and performance monitoring.
2. **Target Audience**: Apperian primarily caters to large enterprises and organizations looking for a robust mobile app management solution to deploy and manage apps at scale. On the other hand, TestFairy is more suitable for app developers and QA teams seeking a tool to streamline app testing processes and gather user feedback.
3. **Integration Support**: Apperian offers integrations with various enterprise systems and services such as MobileIron, Azure, and ServiceNow to ensure seamless app management within existing workflows. TestFairy, on the other hand, focuses on integrations with popular development and testing tools like JIRA, Jenkins, and Slack to enhance collaboration and streamline the testing process.
4. **Deployment Options**: Apperian provides both cloud-based and on-premises deployment options, allowing organizations to choose the deployment model that best suits their security and compliance requirements. TestFairy, however, is primarily a cloud-based solution, offering a quick and easy setup for testing and monitoring apps without the need for on-premises infrastructure.
5. **Customization Flexibility**: Apperian offers a high level of customization options for branding, security policies, and user access controls to tailor the platform to specific organizational requirements. TestFairy, while providing some customization capabilities, focuses more on delivering a user-friendly and intuitive testing and monitoring experience out of the box.
6. **Cost Structure**: Apperian typically follows a subscription-based pricing model with pricing tiers based on the number of users and apps managed. In contrast, TestFairy offers a freemium model with a free plan for small teams and developers, along with premium plans for advanced features and larger organizations.

In Summary, the key differences between Apperian and TestFairy lie in their feature set, target audience, integration support, deployment options, customization flexibility, and cost structure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TestFairy
TestFairy
Apperian
Apperian

When testing apps in the crowd, you never know what exactly was done, and what went wrong on the client side. TestFairy shows you a video of the exact test that was done, including CPU, memory, GPS, network and a lot more.

It is the leading enterprise-class mobile application management (MAM®) and security platform for the delivery of critical apps to 100% of users across an organization.

App distribution; Video recording; Crash handler; Community pages and landing pages; Remote logging; Performance monitoring; Customer feedback
EMM for Unmanaged Devices & BYOD; Extend reach of Mobile Device Management; Beta App Testing
Statistics
Stacks
41
Stacks
1
Followers
76
Followers
1
Votes
29
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Get video rec of the user on your app
  • 4
    Better design
  • 4
    Landing Page
  • 3
    JIRA Integration
  • 2
    GitHub Integration
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Jira
Jira
Jenkins
Jenkins
Bugzilla
Bugzilla
Slack
Slack
Travis CI
Travis CI
GitHub
GitHub
Unity
Unity
PhoneGap
PhoneGap
Xamarin
Xamarin
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to TestFairy, Apperian?

TestFlight

TestFlight

With TestFlight, developers simply upload a build, and the testers can install it directly from their device, over the air.

HockeyApp

HockeyApp

HockeyApp is the best way to collect live crash reports, get feedback from your users, distribute your betas, and analyze your test coverage.

Beta by Crashlytics

Beta by Crashlytics

A streamlined solution for distributing apps that gives you a single, cross-platform toolset for iOS and Android, and a delightful, effortless onboarding for your testers.

Fabric by Twitter

Fabric by Twitter

Installing and managing a wide range of SDKs can be cumbersome and complex. Fabric solves this problem by combining all seven of our SDKs under one roof and organizing them into three Kits: the Crashlytics Kit, the Twitter Kit, and the MoPub Kit.

BoardingBot

BoardingBot

BoardingBot will create a site for your app and allow users to opt-in to beta testing, and receive a TestFlight invitation automatically.

DryDock

DryDock

DryDock is an open source iOS application that we built at Venmo to manage and install all of our internal builds, allow employees to download new experimental apps at any time and to easily share builds designed for a broader audience with their friends.

Updraft

Updraft

It is a platform as a service for continuous mobile app delivery and beta testing. Easy distribute your iOS and Android beta apps to your product managers, testers or designers within your organization and get as early as possible feedback to your beta app. Remove bugs and improve your product to get the highest quality. Continuous enterprise mobile app delivery and bug reporting have never been easier!

Releasable

Releasable

It is a tool for companies to collect feedback from real customers prior to officially launching a product. The tool allows companies to manage all beta testing feedback from one central location, instead of using various disconnected tools for different purposes.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana