Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Appium vs BrowserStack: What are the differences?
Introduction
Appium and BrowserStack are two popular tools used for mobile app and web testing. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two.
Platform Support: Appium is an open-source mobile automation framework that supports both Android and iOS platforms. It allows developers to write test scripts in multiple programming languages such as Java, Ruby, Python, etc. On the other hand, BrowserStack is a cloud-based testing platform that offers support for testing on various devices, browsers, and operating systems. It provides a wide range of real devices including Android, iOS, Windows, and Mac for app and web testing.
Automation Capabilities: Appium is primarily focused on mobile app automation and provides features such as device and app management, screen capturing, touch gestures, etc. It supports both native and hybrid applications. BrowserStack, on the other hand, is designed for web testing and offers advanced automation features like parallel testing, automated screenshots, CSS and XPath selectors, etc. It enables developers to perform cross-browser testing using real devices or virtual machines.
Execution Environment: In Appium, the test scripts are executed on the local machine or on a remote machine connected to the device. It requires additional setup and configuration to establish the connection between the machine and the device. BrowserStack, on the other hand, provides a cloud-based testing environment where the test scripts can be executed on real devices or virtual machines located in their data centers. It eliminates the need for device setup and connection establishment.
Ease of Use: Appium requires a certain level of technical expertise to set up and configure the automation environment. It requires the installation of various tools and libraries and may involve some coding to write test scripts. On the other hand, BrowserStack provides a user-friendly interface that allows users to easily set up test environments, configure devices, and write test scripts using their codeless testing feature. It requires minimal technical knowledge and allows users to create tests using a simple drag and drop interface.
Integration and Collaboration: Appium integrates well with popular continuous integration and test automation tools such as Jenkins, CircleCI, etc. It allows for easy collaboration and integration with other development and testing frameworks. BrowserStack also provides integrations with various popular tools and frameworks like Jenkins, Jira, Slack, etc., making it easier for teams to manage their testing workflows and share test results.
Cost: Appium being an open-source framework is free to use and does not have any licensing costs. However, it requires additional infrastructure and resources to set up the testing environment. BrowserStack is a paid platform that offers different pricing plans based on the usage and requirements. It provides a range of plans catering to different team sizes and testing needs.
In summary, Appium is an open-source mobile automation framework focused on mobile app testing, while BrowserStack is a cloud-based testing platform that supports both mobile app and web testing on a wide range of devices and browsers. Appium requires setup and configuration, whereas BrowserStack offers a ready-to-use testing environment. Appium is free to use, while BrowserStack requires a subscription.
I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.
I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools
A SaaS offering like Sauce Labs (or BrowserStack or LambdaTest, etc) will provide a remote Selenium/Appium Grid including the ability to run test automation in parallel (up to the amount based your subscription level) an a wide array of browsers and mobile devices.
These tools can be expensive, but if you can afford them, the expertise and effort of maintaining the grid, browser updates, etc. is worth it.
AWS Device Farm can be significantly cheaper, but is much more work to setup and run. It will not give you as many devices, or the reporting and screen/video capture you get with the the services. And there is no support for AWS Device Farm, and very poor documentation. I have used it, but do not recommend it. Running your own grid and physical device lab is better, but I'd stick with a service like Sauce Labs or Perfecto which will save you time and give you better services despite the higher price tag.
Stability - Just works. Availability - More than 15 datacenters. Enterprise features like SSO, local testing and SOC2/GDPR compliant.
BitBar's Dedicated Devices would be a great option for you. It allows you to dedicate (reserve) devices for your use only which also having access to all of the devices in the shared cloud. BitBar has the features and integrations that you are looking for as well.
Pros of Appium
- Webdriverio support12
- Java, C#, Python support6
- Open source3
- Great GUI with inspector2
- Active community2
- Support android test automation1
- Internal API access1
- Support iOS test automation1
Pros of BrowserStack
- Multiple browsers135
- Ease of use76
- Real browsers65
- Ability to use it locally44
- Good price27
- Great web interface21
- IE support19
- Official mobile emulators17
- Cloud-based access15
- Instant access15
- Real mobile devices12
- Multiple Desktop OS8
- Selenium compatible8
- Screenshots8
- Can be used for Testing and E2E7
- Pre-installed developer tools6
- Video of test runs5
- Supports Manual, Functional and Visual Diff Testing4
- Favourites4
- Webdriver compatible4
- Many browsers4
- Test Management3
- Test automation dashboard3
- Cypress Compatible3
- Bi-directional Jira Sync3
- Free for Open Source3
- Unify and track test cases3
- Cross-browser testing3
- Speed is fast2
- Real devices2
- Private devices1
- Test WCAG Compliance1
- Web accessibility1
- Visual testing and review1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Appium
Cons of BrowserStack
- Very limited choice of minor versions2