StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Mobile Test Automation
  5. Appium vs Robotium

Appium vs Robotium

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Robotium
Robotium
Stacks7
Followers17
Votes0
Appium
Appium
Stacks650
Followers574
Votes28
GitHub Stars20.8K
Forks6.2K

Appium vs Robotium: What are the differences?

Introduction

Appium and Robotium are both popular automation testing frameworks used for mobile app testing. While both frameworks serve the same purpose, there are several key differences between them that set them apart. In this article, we will explore these differences in detail.

  1. Cross-platform support: Appium is a cross-platform automation framework that allows you to write tests for both Android and iOS apps using a single codebase. It uses the WebDriver protocol and supports multiple programming languages. On the other hand, Robotium is an Android-specific automation framework that is designed specifically for testing Android apps. It provides a simpler and more streamlined approach for Android app testing.

  2. Development language: Appium supports multiple programming languages like Java, Python, Ruby, and more, offering developers the flexibility to write tests in their preferred language. Robotium, on the other hand, is mainly based on Java and provides a Java library for automating Android app tests. This can be beneficial for teams already familiar with Java as their primary programming language.

  3. Application structure: Appium allows you to automate tests at the app's UI level, providing access to different elements like buttons, fields, etc. It supports both native and hybrid apps, allowing you to test various types of mobile applications. On the other hand, Robotium allows you to test at a higher level, providing functionality to perform user actions like clicking buttons, entering text, etc. It provides more control over the app's behavior during testing.

  4. Test execution: In Appium, tests are executed on the actual devices or simulators/emulators, providing more accurate results. It utilizes the existing testing frameworks like JUnit or TestNG to manage and execute the tests. Robotium, on the other hand, allows you to execute tests both on actual devices and emulators, giving you flexibility in choosing the testing environment.

  5. Ease of use: Appium is known for its steep learning curve due to the complex set-up and configuration process. It requires installing and setting up various dependencies and tools. Robotium, on the other hand, provides a simpler and more beginner-friendly approach. With its straightforward API and easy setup, it allows developers to get started quickly with Android app testing.

  6. Community support: Appium has a larger and more active community compared to Robotium. This means that you can find more resources, tutorials, and community-driven libraries for solving common automation challenges. It also ensures regular updates and bug fixes, making it a more robust and dependable framework. Robotium, while it also has a community, is relatively smaller and less active.

In Summary, Appium provides cross-platform support, supports multiple programming languages, and allows automation at the UI level. It has a steeper learning curve but offers a larger community for support. Robotium, on the other hand, is Android-specific, primarily based on Java, and allows automation at a higher level. It has a simpler setup process and is more beginner-friendly.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Robotium
Robotium
Appium
Appium

It is an Android test automation framework that has full support for native and hybrid applications. It makes it easy to write powerful and robust automatic black-box UI tests for Android applications.

Appium is an open source test automation framework for use with native, hybrid, and mobile web apps. It drives iOS and Android apps using the WebDriver protocol. Appium is sponsored by Sauce Labs and a thriving community of open source developers.

Test Android apps, both native and hybrid; Requires minimal knowledge of the application under test; The framework handles multiple Android activities automatically; Minimal time needed to write solid test cases; Readability of test cases is greatly improved, compared to standard instrumentation tests
Works on native and hybrid mobile apps; Write mobile tests using any language or framework; Open source; Facilitates mobile continuous integration; Mobile test automation tool; Cross-platform (iOS, Android); Framework based on Selenium
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
20.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6.2K
Stacks
7
Stacks
650
Followers
17
Followers
574
Votes
0
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 12
    Webdriverio support
  • 6
    Java, C#, Python support
  • 3
    Open source
  • 2
    Active community
  • 2
    Great GUI with inspector
Integrations
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Android Studio
Android Studio
Gradle
Gradle
Eclipse
Eclipse
Apache Ant
Apache Ant
Android OS
Android OS
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs

What are some alternatives to Robotium, Appium?

BitBar

BitBar

Testdroid provides a set of products for Android and iOS app/game testing on real devices. With different testing solutions, you can efficiently develop and test your mobile apps/games in agile way and achieve your business goals.

Xamarin Test Cloud

Xamarin Test Cloud

Run your app on our huge (and growing) collection of real devices from around the world. Select devices based on form factor, manufacturer, operating system, or even popularity in your target market. We’re adding over 100 devices every month, and if there’s a specific device you need, we’re taking requests.

Gauge

Gauge

Gauge is created by ThoughtWorks. Gauge let you write tests in plain-speak and refactor fearlessly. Gauge’s pluggable architecture allows you to customize your environment so you can write tests in the language and IDE of your choice.

Sedstart

Sedstart

A no-code test automation tool that helps QA teams automate web, mobile, and API tests fast - without writing scripts.

EarlGrey

EarlGrey

EarlGrey is a native iOS UI automation test framework that enables you to write clear, concise tests. With the EarlGrey framework, you have access to enhanced synchronization features. EarlGrey automatically synchronizes with the UI, network requests, and various queues; but still allows you to manually implement customized timings, if needed.

Kobiton

Kobiton

It enables developers and testers to perform automated and manual testing of mobile apps and websites on real devices. Modern DevOps and Quality environments require apps to be tested on hundreds of device/OS/browser combinations. Managing an in-house device-lab is expensive, resource intensive, restrictive and very manual. Kobiton allows for instant provisioning of real devices for testing with automated or manual scripts, and also allows current on-premise devices to be plugged in to form a holistic testing cloud.

Selendroid

Selendroid

Selendroid is a test automation framework which drives off the UI of Android native and hybrid applications (apps) and the mobile web. Tests are written using the Selenium 2 client API

Kiwi

Kiwi

It is a Behavior Driven Development library for iOS development. The goal is to provide a BDD library that is exquisitely simple to setup and use.

pCloudy

pCloudy

It is a smart mobile app testing solution that lets developers ensure their users enjoy a smooth and consistent experience. With it, developers can access manual and automated testing options to facilitate the swift debugging of their applications.

Magneto

Magneto

Magneto was built by Automation Engineers for Automation Engineers out of necessity for a mobile centric test automation framework that's easy to setup, run and utilize.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp