Appveyor
Appveyor

98
74
90
Solano CI
Solano CI

24
23
29
Add tool

Appveyor vs Solano CI: What are the differences?

What is Appveyor? Continuous Integration and Deployment service for busy Windows developers. AppVeyor aims to give powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment tools to every .NET developer without the hassle of setting up and maintaining their own build server.

What is Solano CI? Massively Scalable Continuous Integration and Deployment. Faster Continuous Integration and Deployment with patented auto-parallelization. See results 10 to 80x faster. 14-day free trial. No credit card required.

Appveyor and Solano CI can be primarily classified as "Continuous Integration" tools.

Some of the features offered by Appveyor are:

  • Scriptless, repetitive, one-click deployment of build artifacts to multiple environments
  • YAML configuration
  • Backed by Windows Azure platform

On the other hand, Solano CI provides the following key features:

  • Parallel performance: safe parallel execution and dynamic task distribution finish builds up to 80x faster, automatically
  • Painless, revision-controlled setup: fast self-service setup for new projects and branches, compact YAML configuration file that lives in the code repository
  • Compatible with most developer environments: seamlessly supports popular languages such as Java, C/C++, Python, Ruby, JavaScript, Scala, PHP and Go

"Github integration" is the primary reason why developers consider Appveyor over the competitors, whereas "Uber-fast highly customizable parallel builds" was stated as the key factor in picking Solano CI.

- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Appveyor?

AppVeyor aims to give powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment tools to every .NET developer without the hassle of setting up and maintaining their own build server.

What is Solano CI?

Faster Continuous Integration and Deployment with patented auto-parallelization. See results 10 to 80x faster. 14-day free trial. No credit card required.

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Appveyor?
Why do developers choose Solano CI?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

What are the cons of using Appveyor?
What are the cons of using Solano CI?
    Be the first to leave a con
      Be the first to leave a con
      What companies use Appveyor?
      What companies use Solano CI?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Appveyor?
      What tools integrate with Solano CI?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to Appveyor and Solano CI?
      TeamCity
      TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.
      Jenkins
      In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
      CircleCI
      Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.
      Travis CI
      Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.
      Codeship
      Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.
      See all alternatives
      Decisions about Appveyor and Solano CI
      No stack decisions found
      Interest over time
      Reviews of Appveyor and Solano CI
      Review ofSolano CISolano CI

      Some of the stuff I've enjoyed the most about Solano:

      • turnkey parallelism out of the box, with very little setup required (ie, it's fasstttt with almost no work)
      • in all, when I set it up 2 years ago, I found it much easier to set up than the competitor service we were using at the time (and I've set up a couple competing services since then -- this is is still the easiest)
      • sane defaults, project auto-detection, extensive configuration available (versions of everything)
      • useful parsed results that are sortable & filterable (ie, you can filter just to show failed specs)
      • github integration (commit hooks + badges on PRs)
      • cached dependencies (for ruby, it's the bundle by default but you can add custom stuff like assets)
      • infinitely customizable (I set up a project to run specs for a mobile app I'm building. maybe not impressive to some of you but as a rails developer, I thought it was cool)
      Review ofAppveyorAppveyor

      Appveyor, is awesome, it provides a lot of functionalities and a reduced price. If you want .NET CI, appveyor is the best option. Ever. Awesome support, easy configuration, private nuget repo included, many integrations, and useful documentation. The only downside is, sometime it's a little bit slow.

      Review ofSolano CISolano CI

      Solano is a great CI tool, and it has become an essential part of our build process. The suite builds in parallel, which makes test runs fast. The support team is super responsive and helpful.

      How developers use Appveyor and Solano CI
      Avatar of Airbnb
      Airbnb uses Solano CISolano CI

      "There are a ton of excellent strategies for speeding up Rails test suites—aggressive use of stubbing/test doubles, decoupling logic from models, avoiding loading Rails entirely—but given the size of our codebase and the velocity with which we’re moving, most of these weren’t immediately feasible. We needed a build system that would allow us to parallelize our test suite so that the real time taken to run the suite was manageable.

      Our SRE team went through several different continuous integration solutions in the last year before settling on Solano.

      Each of the previous systems had some issue: instability, memory consumption, poor DB management, poor parallelization, painful web UI, you name it. What Solano gives us is an on-premise solution with excellent native support for fanning out tests to multiple threads, running them in parallel, and then assembling the results. It has a great web UI, CLI support, and impressive performance. Since we started using it, our deploy workflow has grown noticeably faster, and the number of wails and anguished GIFs from frustrated engineers is at an all-time low."

      Avatar of Nate Ferrell
      Nate Ferrell uses AppveyorAppveyor

      We use AppVeyor for unit and integration testing of the Vaporshell module for Powershell, as well as deployment on successful tests via PSDeploy

      Avatar of Valery Sntx
      Valery Sntx uses AppveyorAppveyor

      Continious Integration

      Avatar of pyramania
      pyramania uses Solano CISolano CI

      CI Server

      How much does Appveyor cost?
      How much does Solano CI cost?
      Pricing unavailable
      News about Appveyor
      More news