StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Infrastructure Build Tools
  5. Atlas vs Rancher

Atlas vs Rancher

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Atlas
Atlas
Stacks33
Followers125
Votes0
Rancher
Rancher
Stacks952
Followers1.5K
Votes644

Atlas vs Rancher: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between Atlas and Rancher, two popular cloud management platforms.

1. **Architecture**:
Atlas is a MongoDB-specific platform that provides database as a service. It is designed to work seamlessly with MongoDB databases, offering features like database clusters and automated backups. On the other hand, Rancher is a container management platform that supports multiple orchestrators such as Kubernetes, Swarm, and Mesos. It focuses on container orchestration and management across different environments.

2. **Scalability**:
When it comes to scalability, Atlas offers horizontal scalability by allowing users to dynamically add or remove nodes to their clusters based on demand. Rancher, on the other hand, provides horizontal scalability by enabling users to easily scale their containerized workloads across different clusters or environments.

3. **Supported Workloads**:
Atlas is specifically tailored for MongoDB workloads and is optimized for managing MongoDB databases in the cloud. Rancher, on the other hand, is more versatile and can support a wide range of workloads beyond just databases, including microservices, stateful applications, and batch jobs.

4. **Community Support**:
Rancher has a robust community around it, with a large user base and active contributors who regularly provide support, feedback, and contributions to the platform. Atlas, being a managed service by MongoDB, has a more focused support structure directly from the MongoDB team.

5. **Pricing Model**:
Atlas offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on usage, with options for different tiers and features. Rancher, on the other hand, is open-source and free to use, but additional support and enterprise features are available through a subscription-based model.

6. **Integration with Other Tools**:
Rancher offers extensive integrations with various tools and platforms such as CI/CD pipelines, monitoring solutions, and external storage providers. Atlas, being a managed service, has limited integrations compared to Rancher but does offer some connectivity options for external services.

In summary, Atlas is focused on MongoDB-specific workloads with a managed service approach, while Rancher is a versatile container management platform supporting multiple orchestrators with a strong community base and extensive integrations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Atlas
Atlas
Rancher
Rancher

Atlas is one foundation to manage and provide visibility to your servers, containers, VMs, configuration management, service discovery, and additional operations services.

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

One command to develop any application: vagrant up;One command to deploy any application: vagrant push
Manage Hosts, Deploy Containers, Monitor Resources;User Management & Collaboration;Native Docker APIs & Tools;Monitoring and Logging;Connect Containers, Manage Disks, Deploy Load Balancers;Docker App Catalog; Included Kubernetes Distribution;Included Docker Swarm Distribution; Included Mesos Distribution;Infrastructure Management
Statistics
Stacks
33
Stacks
952
Followers
125
Followers
1.5K
Votes
0
Votes
644
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 103
    Easy to use
  • 79
    Open source and totally free
  • 63
    Multi-host docker-compose support
  • 58
    Load balancing and health check included
  • 58
    Simple
Cons
  • 10
    Hosting Rancher can be complicated
Integrations
No integrations available
Jenkins
Jenkins
Datadog
Datadog
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Drone.io
Drone.io

What are some alternatives to Atlas, Rancher?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

AWS CloudFormation

AWS CloudFormation

You can use AWS CloudFormation’s sample templates or create your own templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run your application. You don’t need to figure out the order in which AWS services need to be provisioned or the subtleties of how to make those dependencies work.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

Packer

Packer

Packer automates the creation of any type of machine image. It embraces modern configuration management by encouraging you to use automated scripts to install and configure the software within your Packer-made images.

Scalr

Scalr

Scalr is a remote state & operations backend for Terraform with access controls, policy as code, and many quality of life features.

Pulumi

Pulumi

Pulumi is a cloud development platform that makes creating cloud programs easy and productive. Skip the YAML and just write code. Pulumi is multi-language, multi-cloud and fully extensible in both its engine and ecosystem of packages.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana