StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Auth0 vs WSO2 Identity Server

Auth0 vs WSO2 Identity Server

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Auth0
Auth0
Stacks1.4K
Followers2.1K
Votes215
WSO2 Identity Server
WSO2 Identity Server
Stacks26
Followers81
Votes3
GitHub Stars825
Forks928

Auth0 vs WSO2 Identity Server: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Auth0 and WSO2 Identity Server are both popular identity and access management (IAM) solutions that provide features to secure and manage user identities. However, there are several key differences between these two platforms. This article aims to highlight six specific differences between Auth0 and WSO2 Identity Server.

  1. Deployment Models: While Auth0 is a cloud-based IAM solution, WSO2 Identity Server offers both on-premises and cloud deployment options. This difference in deployment models allows organizations to choose the option that best suits their specific requirements and preferences.

  2. Customization and Extensibility: Auth0 offers a highly customizable and extensible platform, allowing developers to tailor the IAM solution to their unique needs. On the other hand, WSO2 Identity Server provides even greater customization and extensibility options, including the ability to add custom components, plugins, and extensions.

  3. Scalability: Both Auth0 and WSO2 Identity Server are designed to handle large user bases and high-scale usage. However, WSO2 Identity Server boasts greater scalability, with built-in support for horizontal scaling and distributed deployments, making it suitable for enterprises with extensive and complex IAM requirements.

  4. Standards Support: WSO2 Identity Server has a strong focus on standards-based authentication, authorization, and federation protocols like SAML, OAuth, and OpenID Connect. Auth0 also supports these standards but provides additional proprietary protocols and frameworks, such as Auth0.js, to simplify the integration process.

  5. Developer Experience: Auth0 prides itself on its developer-friendly experience, providing extensive documentation, SDKs, and libraries for various programming languages and frameworks. WSO2 Identity Server also offers comprehensive developer resources, including APIs, SDKs, and sample applications, but may require a steeper learning curve due to its flexibility and advanced features.

  6. Pricing Model: Auth0 follows a subscription-based pricing model, wherein users pay based on the number of active users and additional features required. In contrast, WSO2 Identity Server follows an open-source model, where the core functionality is free to use but additional enterprise features may require a paid subscription. This difference in pricing models allows organizations to choose the option that aligns with their budget and specific needs.

In Summary, Auth0 and WSO2 Identity Server differ in their deployment models, customization and extensibility options, scalability, standards support, developer experience, and pricing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Auth0, WSO2 Identity Server

Vaibhav
Vaibhav

Jul 17, 2020

Needs advice

Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?

As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?

220k views220k
Comments
Brent
Brent

CEO at DEFY Labs

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.

When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.

The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.

297k views297k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Auth0
Auth0
WSO2 Identity Server
WSO2 Identity Server

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

It helps you do single sign-on and identity federation backed by strong and adaptive authentication, securely expose APIs, and manage identities by connecting to heterogeneous user stores. Leverage the power of open-source IAM in your enterprise to innovate fast and build secure Customer IAM (CIAM) solutions to provide an experience your users will love.

User and Password support with verification and forgot password email workflow; Painless SAML Auth with Enterprises; Integration with 20+ Social Providers; SDKs for all platforms mobile and web; Token-based authentication for APIs
Single Sign on (SSO); Identity Federation; Strong and Adaptive Authentication ; Account management and provisioning ; Access Control ; API and Microservices security ; Identity Analytics
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
825
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
928
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
26
Followers
2.1K
Followers
81
Votes
215
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 70
    JSON web token
  • 31
    Integration with 20+ Social Providers
  • 20
    SDKs
  • 20
    It's a universal solution
  • 15
    Amazing Documentation
Cons
  • 15
    Pricing too high (Developer Pro)
  • 7
    Poor support
  • 4
    Status page not reflect actual status
  • 4
    Rapidly changing API
Pros
  • 1
    It's a open source solution
  • 1
    Supports multiple identity provider
  • 1
    OpenID and SAML support
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Parse
Parse
Firebase
Firebase
Ruby
Ruby
PHP
PHP
Laravel
Laravel
Python
Python
Java
Java
Spring
Spring
OAuth.io
OAuth.io
OpenID Connect
OpenID Connect

What are some alternatives to Auth0, WSO2 Identity Server?

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope