StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Cloud IDE
  5. Cloud9 IDE vs Docker

Cloud9 IDE vs Docker

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS Cloud9
AWS Cloud9
Stacks522
Followers714
Votes673
Docker
Docker
Stacks194.2K
Followers143.8K
Votes3.9K

Cloud9 IDE vs Docker: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of software development, tools like Cloud9 IDE and Docker have become indispensable for modern development projects. However, these two tools have key differences that set them apart in terms of usage and functionality.

  1. Deployment Methodology: Cloud9 IDE is a cloud-based integrated development environment where the entire development process takes place in the cloud, offering flexibility and ease of use for developers. On the other hand, Docker is a containerization technology that allows developers to encapsulate their applications along with all dependencies into containers, making it easier to deploy across different environments.

  2. Resource Management: Cloud9 IDE provides a managed environment with pre-configured resources and tools, reducing the burden of setting up and maintaining development environments. In contrast, Docker allows developers to manage resources at a more granular level, giving them more control over how their applications utilize resources like CPU, memory, and storage.

  3. Isolation and Scalability: Docker offers better isolation for applications through containers, which are lightweight and enable applications to run in isolated environments without interference from other applications. This isolation also makes it easier to scale applications up or down based on demand. Cloud9 IDE, while offering virtual environments, may not provide the same level of isolation and scalability as Docker.

  4. Portability and Compatibility: Docker containers are portable and can run on any system that supports Docker, making it easier to deploy applications across different platforms without worrying about compatibility issues. Cloud9 IDE, while accessible from any system with an internet connection, may have limitations in terms of compatibility with certain development tools or frameworks.

  5. Networking Capabilities: Docker provides advanced networking capabilities that allow containers to communicate with each other and external systems through customizable network configurations. Cloud9 IDE, being a cloud-based platform, may have networking limitations based on the hosting provider's infrastructure.

  6. Security Management: Docker offers robust security features for containers, such as isolation, user permissions, and secure communication, making it a secure choice for deploying applications. Cloud9 IDE, being a cloud-based platform, may have security measures in place but may not offer the same level of control and customization as Docker in terms of securing applications and data.

In Summary, Cloud9 IDE and Docker differ in deployment methodology, resource management, isolation and scalability, portability and compatibility, networking capabilities, and security management, catering to different needs in the realm of software development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on AWS Cloud9, Docker

Florian
Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

483k views483k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

AWS Cloud9
AWS Cloud9
Docker
Docker

Cloud9 provides a development environment in the cloud. Cloud9 enables developers to get started with coding immediately with pre-setup environments called workspaces, collaborate with their peers with collaborative coding features, and build web apps with features like live preview and browser compatibility testing. It supports more than 40 languages, with class A support for PHP, Ruby, Python, JavaScript/Node.js, and Go.

The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere

Real-time collaboration and chat;Connect via SSH and FTP;Code Completion (suggestions);Highlighting and syntax hints;Goto File- fast file access;Adaptive Themes- chnage themes and skin;Code Folding- folding arrows allow you to collapse code;Multiple cursors- add a cursor to the rows above and below the current line;Focus- Every part of the Cloud9 UI can be collapsed or hidden entirely, so you get the maximum space to focus on your code. And for the truly exceptional among us, there’s zen mode, where the editor floats above the IDE to fill 100% of the browser.;Drag & Drop- The project tree scrolls, highlights and expands folders automatically for the most natural drag n drop experience.;Command-Line- command-line is your shortcut to a ton of useful features, like "mkdir", "npm", "git" and "zen";Git and Mercurial support;Seamless Node.js Integration
Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion
Statistics
Stacks
522
Stacks
194.2K
Followers
714
Followers
143.8K
Votes
673
Votes
3.9K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 108
    Easy to use
  • 102
    Free
  • 76
    Nice UI
  • 65
    Terminal access to vm instead of simulation
  • 58
    New full ubuntu machines
Cons
  • 6
    Not free
Pros
  • 823
    Rapid integration and build up
  • 692
    Isolation
  • 521
    Open source
  • 505
    Testa­bil­i­ty and re­pro­ducibil­i­ty
  • 460
    Lightweight
Cons
  • 8
    New versions == broken features
  • 6
    Documentation not always in sync
  • 6
    Unreliable networking
  • 4
    Moves quickly
  • 3
    Not Secure
Integrations
Heroku
Heroku
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Java
Java
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
Linux
Linux
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
boot2docker
boot2docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker Machine
Docker Machine
Vagrant
Vagrant

What are some alternatives to AWS Cloud9, Docker?

Red Hat Codeready Workspaces

Red Hat Codeready Workspaces

Built on the open Eclipse Che project, Red Hat CodeReady Workspaces provides developer workspaces, which include all the tools and the dependencies that are needed to code, build, test, run, and debug applications.

Koding

Koding

Koding is a feature rich cloud-based development environment complete with free VMs, an attractive IDE & sudo level terminal access!

Nitrous.IO

Nitrous.IO

Get setup lightning fast in the cloud & code from anywhere, on any machine.

Codeanywhere

Codeanywhere

A development platform that enables you to not only edit your files from underlying services like FTP, GitHub, Dropbox and the like, but on top of that gives you the ability to collaborate, embed and share through Codeanywhere on any device.

LXD

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

Codio

Codio

Every project gets its own Box: an instantly available server-side development environment with full terminal access. With features such as forking, collaboration, importing from Git repos and more, Codio strives to remove as many barriers as possible to create a platform developers will enjoy using as their IDE of choice.

Eclipse Che

Eclipse Che

Eclipse Che makes Kubernetes development accessible for developer teams, providing one-click developer workspaces and eliminating local environment configuration for your entire team.

CodeSandbox

CodeSandbox

CodeSandbox allows developers to simply go to a URL in their browser to start building. This not only makes it easier to get started, it also makes it easier to share. You can just share your created work by sharing the URL, others can then (without downloading) further develop on these sandboxes.

StackBlitz

StackBlitz

StackBlitz is the browser-based IDE that eliminates time-consuming local configuration and lets you spend 
more time coding. Develop with Next.js, React, Angular, Vite, and more in a Node.js development environment entirely in your browser

LXC

LXC

LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana