AWS CloudFormation vs Google Cloud Deployment Manager: What are the differences?
Developers describe AWS CloudFormation as "Create and manage a collection of related AWS resources". You can use AWS CloudFormation’s sample templates or create your own templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run your application. You don’t need to figure out the order in which AWS services need to be provisioned or the subtleties of how to make those dependencies work. On the other hand, Google Cloud Deployment Manager is detailed as "Create and manage cloud resources with simple templates". Google Cloud Deployment Manager allows you to specify all the resources needed for your application in a declarative format using yaml.
AWS CloudFormation and Google Cloud Deployment Manager can be categorized as "Infrastructure Build" tools.
What is AWS CloudFormation?
What is Google Cloud Deployment Manager?
Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose Google Cloud Deployment Manager?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Google Cloud Deployment Manager?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Manually clicking around the AWS UI or scripting AWS CLI calls can be both a slow and brittle process.
We needed to be able to reconstruct CloudRepo's infrastructure in case of disaster or moving to another AWS Region.
Setting up our infrastructure with CloudFormation allows us to update it easily as well as duplicate or recreate things when the need arises.
Opstax uses CloudFormation for anything infrastructure related! CloudFormation allows us to use infrastructure-as-code as a constant blueprint/map of our environment. It means we can accurately and efficiently deploy replicated or new infrastructure with no time wasted clicking around and no human error.
Manage infrastructure as codes. Native AWS solution so it has better support to AWS resources than Terraform, also can leverage AWS Business Support.