StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. AWS CodeBuild vs ESLint

AWS CodeBuild vs ESLint

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ESLint
ESLint
Stacks38.6K
Followers14.0K
Votes28
GitHub Stars26.6K
Forks4.8K
AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild
Stacks443
Followers485
Votes43

AWS CodeBuild vs ESLint: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AWS CodeBuild and ESLint

Introduction

AWS CodeBuild and ESLint are two popular tools used in software development. While both tools serve different purposes, they play important roles in ensuring code quality and optimizing the development process.

  1. Integration: AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed continuous integration service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), which allows developers to build, test, and deploy applications in a scalable and reliable manner. On the other hand, ESLint is a widely used open-source JavaScript linter that helps detect and fix code errors, enforce coding standards, and improve code readability.

  2. Scope of Use: AWS CodeBuild is a comprehensive service that supports multiple programming languages and build configurations. It is suitable for building and testing code across different platforms and development frameworks. In contrast, ESLint is specifically designed for JavaScript projects and focuses on analyzing and providing suggestions for code quality improvements.

  3. Automatic Builds: One of the key features of AWS CodeBuild is its ability to automatically trigger builds based on events such as code commits, pull requests, or scheduled intervals. This enables continuous integration and ensures that the latest code changes are promptly built and tested. In comparison, ESLint does not have built-in automation capabilities, and developers typically run it manually or integrate it into their code editors or build pipelines.

  4. Error Detection: AWS CodeBuild primarily focuses on building and packaging code. While it may detect build-related errors and configuration issues, its main purpose is not to perform in-depth code analysis and identify specific code errors or style violations. On the other hand, ESLint specializes in analyzing JavaScript code and can detect various types of errors, including syntax errors, unused variables, and non-compliant coding styles.

  5. Customization Options: AWS CodeBuild offers a range of configuration options, including build environments, build specifications, and integration with other AWS services. It provides the flexibility to customize build processes and integration workflows according to specific project requirements. In contrast, ESLint provides a wide array of customizable rules and plugins that developers can choose from to enforce their preferred coding standards and practices.

  6. Scalability: AWS CodeBuild is a cloud-based service that can scale automatically based on project demands. It can handle a large number of concurrent builds and leverage AWS infrastructure for high availability and performance. On the other hand, ESLint's scalability depends on the resources of the developer's local machine or the CI/CD environment in which it is integrated.

In summary, AWS CodeBuild and ESLint differ in their scopes of use, automation capabilities, error detection focus, customization options, and scalability. AWS CodeBuild focuses on building and testing code across multiple platforms and enhances the continuous integration process, while ESLint specializes in analyzing JavaScript code and improving code quality through error detection and enforcing coding standards.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on ESLint, AWS CodeBuild

Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

ESLint
ESLint
AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers.

-
Fully Managed Build Service;Continuous Scaling;Enables Continuous Integration;Integrates seamlessly with AWS services;FAQs: https://aws.amazon.com/codebuild/faqs/
Statistics
GitHub Stars
26.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
38.6K
Stacks
443
Followers
14.0K
Followers
485
Votes
28
Votes
43
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Consistent javascript - opinions don't matter anymore
  • 6
    IDE Integration
  • 6
    Free
  • 4
    Customizable
  • 2
    Broad ecosystem of support & users
Pros
  • 7
    Pay per minute
  • 5
    Parameter Store integration for passing secrets
  • 4
    Integrated with AWS
  • 3
    Streaming logs to Amazon CloudWatch
  • 3
    Bit bucket integration
Cons
  • 2
    Poor branch support
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
AWS CloudFormation
AWS CloudFormation
Jenkins
Jenkins
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise

What are some alternatives to ESLint, AWS CodeBuild?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana