AWS CodeBuild vs Selenium

Overview

Selenium

Stacks16.2K

Followers12.6K

Votes527

GitHub Stars33.6K

Forks8.6K

AWS CodeBuild

Stacks443

Followers485

Votes43

AWS CodeBuild vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Introduction

AWS CodeBuild and Selenium are both commonly used in the software development process, but they serve different purposes and have distinct features. Understanding the key differences between the two can help developers choose the most appropriate tool for their specific needs.

Deployment Environment: One of the main differences between AWS CodeBuild and Selenium is the deployment environment they operate in. AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that runs within the cloud environment. It is designed to compile and test code in a serverless way, allowing developers to focus on their applications without worrying about infrastructure. In contrast, Selenium is an open-source tool that requires developers to set up and configure their own testing environment, which can be a local machine or a dedicated testing server.
Testing Capabilities: Another significant difference between AWS CodeBuild and Selenium lies in their testing capabilities. AWS CodeBuild is primarily focused on building and testing code as part of the continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) pipeline. It integrates well with other AWS services and allows for the execution of various types of tests, such as unit tests, integration tests, and regression tests. On the other hand, Selenium is specifically designed for web application testing. It provides a range of features and APIs that enable developers to automate browser actions, perform functional testing, and validate the user interface of web applications across different browsers and platforms.
Scalability and Flexibility: AWS CodeBuild offers scalability and flexibility with respect to resource allocation. It allows developers to define and provision the required resources, such as compute power and memory, for each build job. This means that CodeBuild can handle an increasing workload by scaling up or down based on demand. Selenium, on the other hand, relies on the resources allocated to the testing environment it is deployed in. It may require manual provisioning and scaling of resources, which can be more time-consuming and less flexible compared to the serverless nature of AWS CodeBuild.
Integration with Development Tools: AWS CodeBuild seamlessly integrates with popular development tools and services, such as AWS CodeCommit, AWS CodePipeline, and AWS CodeDeploy. This tight integration enables continuous integration and deployment workflows and enhances collaboration among developers. Selenium, being an open-source tool, also supports integration with various development tools, but the process of integration may involve more manual configuration and customization.
Pricing Model: AWS CodeBuild follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are billed based on the compute resources consumed and the duration of build jobs. The cost varies depending on the size and complexity of the build. Selenium, being an open-source tool, is free to use, but users need to consider the costs associated with setting up and maintaining their own testing environment.
Community and Support: AWS CodeBuild benefits from the extensive AWS community and support ecosystem. It has comprehensive documentation, active forums, and dedicated support channels provided by AWS. Selenium also has a vibrant community of users and contributors who actively contribute to its development and provide support through forums and online communities. However, the level of official support from a single vendor may vary in comparison to the support provided by AWS for CodeBuild.

In summary, AWS CodeBuild and Selenium differ in terms of their deployment environment, testing capabilities, scalability and flexibility, integration with development tools, pricing model, and community and support. Developers should consider these differences when selecting the appropriate tool for their specific needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Selenium, AWS CodeBuild

Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenium	AWS CodeBuild
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.	AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers.
-	Fully Managed Build Service;Continuous Scaling;Enables Continuous Integration;Integrates seamlessly with AWS services;FAQs: https://aws.amazon.com/codebuild/faqs/
Statistics
GitHub Stars 33.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 8.6K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 16.2K	Stacks 443
Followers 12.6K	Followers 485
Votes 527	Votes 43
Pros & Cons
Pros 177 Automates browsers 154 Testing 101 Essential tool for running test automation 24 Remote Control 24 Record-Playback Cons 8 Flaky tests 4 Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui) 2 Update browser drivers	Pros 7 Pay per minute 5 Parameter Store integration for passing secrets 4 Integrated with AWS 3 Streaming logs to Amazon CloudWatch 3 Bit bucket integration Cons 2 Poor branch support
Integrations
No integrations available	AWS Elastic Beanstalk AWS CodeCommit Amazon S3 GitHub Bitbucket AWS CloudFormation Jenkins GitHub Enterprise

What are some alternatives to Selenium, AWS CodeBuild?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Related Comparisons

AWS CodeBuild vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Introduction

Deployment Environment: One of the main differences between AWS CodeBuild and Selenium is the deployment environment they operate in. AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that runs within the cloud environment. It is designed to compile and test code in a serverless way, allowing developers to focus on their applications without worrying about infrastructure. In contrast, Selenium is an open-source tool that requires developers to set up and configure their own testing environment, which can be a local machine or a dedicated testing server.
Testing Capabilities: Another significant difference between AWS CodeBuild and Selenium lies in their testing capabilities. AWS CodeBuild is primarily focused on building and testing code as part of the continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) pipeline. It integrates well with other AWS services and allows for the execution of various types of tests, such as unit tests, integration tests, and regression tests. On the other hand, Selenium is specifically designed for web application testing. It provides a range of features and APIs that enable developers to automate browser actions, perform functional testing, and validate the user interface of web applications across different browsers and platforms.
Scalability and Flexibility: AWS CodeBuild offers scalability and flexibility with respect to resource allocation. It allows developers to define and provision the required resources, such as compute power and memory, for each build job. This means that CodeBuild can handle an increasing workload by scaling up or down based on demand. Selenium, on the other hand, relies on the resources allocated to the testing environment it is deployed in. It may require manual provisioning and scaling of resources, which can be more time-consuming and less flexible compared to the serverless nature of AWS CodeBuild.
Integration with Development Tools: AWS CodeBuild seamlessly integrates with popular development tools and services, such as AWS CodeCommit, AWS CodePipeline, and AWS CodeDeploy. This tight integration enables continuous integration and deployment workflows and enhances collaboration among developers. Selenium, being an open-source tool, also supports integration with various development tools, but the process of integration may involve more manual configuration and customization.
Pricing Model: AWS CodeBuild follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are billed based on the compute resources consumed and the duration of build jobs. The cost varies depending on the size and complexity of the build. Selenium, being an open-source tool, is free to use, but users need to consider the costs associated with setting up and maintaining their own testing environment.
Community and Support: AWS CodeBuild benefits from the extensive AWS community and support ecosystem. It has comprehensive documentation, active forums, and dedicated support channels provided by AWS. Selenium also has a vibrant community of users and contributors who actively contribute to its development and provide support through forums and online communities. However, the level of official support from a single vendor may vary in comparison to the support provided by AWS for CodeBuild.

AWS CodeBuild vs Selenium

Overview