Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit

135
129
+ 1
179
GitBucket
GitBucket

53
63
+ 1
36
Add tool

AWS CodeCommit vs GitBucket: What are the differences?

AWS CodeCommit: Fully-managed source control service that makes it easy for companies to host secure and highly scalable private Git repositories. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools; GitBucket: The easily installable Github clone powered by Scala. GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

AWS CodeCommit and GitBucket belong to "Code Collaboration & Version Control" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by AWS CodeCommit are:

  • Collaboration
  • Encryption
  • Access Control

On the other hand, GitBucket provides the following key features:

  • Public / Private Git repository (http and ssh access)
  • Repository viewer and online file editing
  • Repository search (Code and Issues)

"Free private repos" is the primary reason why developers consider AWS CodeCommit over the competitors, whereas "Self hosted" was stated as the key factor in picking GitBucket.

GitBucket is an open source tool with 7.73K GitHub stars and 1.06K GitHub forks. Here's a link to GitBucket's open source repository on GitHub.

According to the StackShare community, AWS CodeCommit has a broader approval, being mentioned in 25 company stacks & 17 developers stacks; compared to GitBucket, which is listed in 3 company stacks and 6 developer stacks.

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is AWS CodeCommit?

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

What is GitBucket?

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose AWS CodeCommit?
Why do developers choose GitBucket?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more consMake informed product decisions

    What companies use AWS CodeCommit?
    What companies use GitBucket?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with AWS CodeCommit?
    What tools integrate with GitBucket?
    What are some alternatives to AWS CodeCommit and GitBucket?
    GitHub
    GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
    GitLab
    GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
    Bitbucket
    Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
    GitHub Enterprise
    GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.
    SVN (Subversion)
    Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.
    See all alternatives
    Decisions about AWS CodeCommit and GitBucket
    No stack decisions found
    Interest over time
    Reviews of AWS CodeCommit and GitBucket
    Avatar of AnakinPt
    Lead Engineer at Fineos
    Review ofAWS CodeCommitAWS CodeCommit

    The pull requests are only merged by FF what makes all the merges hard to manage. The IAM configuration is very awkward and the unavailability to add git hooks to prevent commits to be made into the server makes this tool not much usable for a software development company.

    Avatar of XWolfOverride
    Programador
    Review ofGitBucketGitBucket

    A great, easy and powerful git repository.

    Doing thinks well, and fast growing

    How developers use AWS CodeCommit and GitBucket
    Avatar of Volkan Özçelik
    Volkan Özçelik uses AWS CodeCommitAWS CodeCommit

    I use CodeCommit for projects that require a tighter integration with the AWS ecosystem.

    Otherwise, my default source control system as a service of choice is: GitHub.

    Avatar of Yoshinori N
    Yoshinori N uses GitBucketGitBucket
    • Manage website source code
    How much does AWS CodeCommit cost?
    How much does GitBucket cost?
    Pricing unavailable
    News about AWS CodeCommit
    More news
    News about GitBucket
    More news