AWS CodeCommit vs Gitolite

Overview

Gitolite

Stacks38

Followers87

Votes12

GitHub Stars8.5K

Forks1.0K

AWS CodeCommit

Stacks324

Followers826

Votes193

AWS CodeCommit vs Gitolite: What are the differences?

Hosting: AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed source control service hosted by AWS, while Gitolite is a self-hosted, open-source software used for hosting Git repositories.
Access Control: AWS CodeCommit provides fine-grained access control through AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) policies, whereas Gitolite relies on SSH keys and configuration files for access control.
Scalability: AWS CodeCommit is designed to handle large-scale projects and can easily scale to accommodate growing repositories and users, whereas Gitolite's scalability is limited to the server it is installed on.
Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodeCommit seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like CodePipeline and CodeBuild for automated deployment and continuous integration, while Gitolite does not have native integrations with external services.
Security: AWS CodeCommit offers encryption at rest and in transit, as well as multi-factor authentication options for added security, compared to Gitolite which may require additional configuration for similar security measures.
Cost: AWS CodeCommit is a paid service with pricing based on usage, while Gitolite is open-source and free to use, only incurring costs for server infrastructure and maintenance.

In Summary, AWS CodeCommit and Gitolite differ in hosting, access control, scalability, integration with AWS services, security features, and cost implications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Gitolite, AWS CodeCommit

Kavita

Dec 15, 2020

Needs adviceon

Bitbucket

Jenkins

Jira

Hi, I need advice. In my project, we are using Bitbucket hosted on-prem, Jenkins, and Jira. Also, we have restrictions not to use any plugins for code review, code quality, code security, etc., with bitbucket. Now we want to migrate to AWS CodeCommit, which would mean that we can use, let's say, Amazon CodeGuru for code reviews and move to AWS CodeBuild and AWS CodePipeline for build automation in the future rather than using Jenkins.

Now I want advice on below.

Is it a good idea to migrate from Bitbucket to AWS Codecommit?
If we want to integrate Jira with AWS Codecommit, then how can we do this? If a developer makes any changes in Jira, then a build should be triggered automatically in AWS and create a Jira ticket if the build fails. So, how can we achieve this?

581k views581k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Gitolite	AWS CodeCommit
Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.	CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.
Use a single unix user ("real" user) on the server.;Provide access to many gitolite users: they are not "real" users, so they do not get shell access.;Control access to many git repositories: read access controlled at the repo level, and write access controlled at the branch/tag/file/directory level, including who can rewind, create, and delete branches/tags.;Can be installed without root access, assuming git and perl are already installed.;Authentication is most commonly done using sshd, but you can also use "smart http" mode if you prefer (this may require root access to setup).	Collaboration;Encryption;Access Control;High Availability and Durability;Unlimited Repositories;Easy Access and Integration
Statistics
GitHub Stars 8.5K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.0K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 38	Stacks 324
Followers 87	Followers 826
Votes 12	Votes 193
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 Easy setup 4 Fine-tuned per-branch permissions 1 Free multi-server mirroring 1 Really easy setup 1 Free Cons 1 Antiquated 1 No tools for project and issue tracker 1 Doesn't have any user interface	Pros 44 Free private repos 26 IAM integration 24 Pay-As-You-Go Pricing 20 Amazon feels the most Secure 19 Repo data encrypted at rest Cons 12 UI sucks 4 SLOW 3 No Issue Tracker 2 No fork 2 NO LFS support
Integrations
No integrations available	Git Jenkins

What are some alternatives to Gitolite, AWS CodeCommit?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

AWS CodeCommit vs Gitolite: What are the differences?

Hosting: AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed source control service hosted by AWS, while Gitolite is a self-hosted, open-source software used for hosting Git repositories.
Access Control: AWS CodeCommit provides fine-grained access control through AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) policies, whereas Gitolite relies on SSH keys and configuration files for access control.
Scalability: AWS CodeCommit is designed to handle large-scale projects and can easily scale to accommodate growing repositories and users, whereas Gitolite's scalability is limited to the server it is installed on.
Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodeCommit seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like CodePipeline and CodeBuild for automated deployment and continuous integration, while Gitolite does not have native integrations with external services.
Security: AWS CodeCommit offers encryption at rest and in transit, as well as multi-factor authentication options for added security, compared to Gitolite which may require additional configuration for similar security measures.
Cost: AWS CodeCommit is a paid service with pricing based on usage, while Gitolite is open-source and free to use, only incurring costs for server infrastructure and maintenance.

In Summary, AWS CodeCommit and Gitolite differ in hosting, access control, scalability, integration with AWS services, security features, and cost implications.

AWS CodeCommit vs Gitolite

Overview