AWS CodeCommit vs Semaphore

AWS CodeCommit vs Semaphore: What are the differences?

AWS CodeCommit: Fully-managed source control service that makes it easy for companies to host secure and highly scalable private Git repositories. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools; Semaphore: The continuous integration and delivery platform powering the world’s best engineering teams. Semaphore is the fastest continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) platform on the market, powering the world’s best engineering teams.

AWS CodeCommit belongs to "Code Collaboration & Version Control" category of the tech stack, while Semaphore can be primarily classified under "Continuous Integration".

Some of the features offered by AWS CodeCommit are:

• Collaboration
• Encryption
• Access Control

On the other hand, Semaphore provides the following key features:

• Docker, Kubernetes, iOS support & 100+ preinstalled Tools
• Customizable Continuous Delivery Pipelines
• Customizable Stages, Parallel Execution and Control Flow Switches

"Free private repos" is the primary reason why developers consider AWS CodeCommit over the competitors, whereas "Easy setup" was stated as the key factor in picking Semaphore.

According to the StackShare community, Semaphore has a broader approval, being mentioned in 40 company stacks & 17 developers stacks; compared to AWS CodeCommit, which is listed in 25 company stacks and 17 developer stacks.