Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AWS Device Farm

75
178
+ 1
5
Firebase

40.5K
34.3K
+ 1
2K
Add tool

AWS Device Farm vs Firebase: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of mobile app development, AWS Device Farm and Firebase are widely used platforms for testing and managing mobile applications. Both platforms offer unique features and functions that cater to the diverse needs of app developers.

  1. Deployment Flexibility: One key difference between AWS Device Farm and Firebase is their approach to deployment. AWS Device Farm enables users to upload their app packages and test on a wide range of real devices in the cloud. On the other hand, Firebase offers a more integrated approach, allowing users to easily deploy apps to Firebase Hosting with a single command.

  2. Testing Capabilities: AWS Device Farm focuses primarily on testing mobile apps across a variety of devices, browsers, and operating systems. It provides real-time performance and compatibility testing on physical devices. In contrast, Firebase's testing capabilities mainly revolve around automated testing of app functionality, performance, and security through Firebase Test Lab.

  3. Integration with Ecosystem: AWS Device Farm seamlessly integrates with other Amazon Web Services, allowing users to leverage additional cloud services for their app development needs. In contrast, Firebase offers deep integration with other Google services and tools, providing developers with a more cohesive ecosystem for app development and management.

  4. Cost Structure: The pricing models for AWS Device Farm and Firebase differ significantly. AWS Device Farm charges users based on device minutes utilized for testing, while Firebase offers a more flexible pricing structure based on the number of daily active users and the features used within the platform.

  5. Community Support: Firebase boasts a strong community of developers and resources, including documentation, tutorials, and forums that facilitate collaboration and troubleshooting. While AWS Device Farm offers robust technical support, Firebase's community-driven approach can provide additional insights and solutions for developers.

  6. Analytics and Monitoring: Firebase excels in providing comprehensive analytics and monitoring features for mobile apps, including user engagement metrics, crash reporting, and real-time monitoring. On the other hand, AWS Device Farm focuses more on testing and compatibility, with limited analytics and monitoring capabilities compared to Firebase.

In Summary, AWS Device Farm and Firebase differ in deployment flexibility, testing capabilities, integration with ecosystems, cost structures, community support, and analytics and monitoring features, catering to distinct needs in mobile app development.

Advice on AWS Device Farm and Firebase
Needs advice
on
ApolloApolloFirebaseFirebase
and
Socket.IOSocket.IO

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

See more
Replies (3)
Timothy Malstead
Junior Full Stack Developer at Freelance · | 7 upvotes · 461.3K views
Recommends
on
FirebaseFirebase

I would recommend looking hard into Firebase for this project, especially if you do not have dedicated full-stack or backend members on your team.

The real time database, as you mentioned, is a great option, but I would also look into Firestore. Similar to RTDB, it adds more functions and some cool methods as well. Also, another great thing about Firebase is you have easy access to storage and dead simple auth as well.

Node.js Express MongoDB Socket.IO and Apollo are great technologies as well, and may be the better option if you do not wish to cede as much control to third parties in your application.

Overall, I say if you wish to focus more time developing your React application instead of other parts of your stack, Firebase is a great way to do that.

See more
Recommends
on
AblyAbly

Hello Noam 👋,

I suggest taking a look at Ably, it has all the realtime features you need and the platform is designed to guarantee critical functionality at scale.

Here is an in depth comparison between Ably and Firebase

See more
Recommends
on
8base8base

Hey Noam,

I would recommend you to take a look into 8base. It has features you've requested, also relation database and GraphQL API which will help you to develop rapidly.

Thanks, Ilya

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of AWS Device Farm
Pros of Firebase
  • 3
    1000 free minutes
  • 2
    Pay as you go pricing
  • 371
    Realtime backend made easy
  • 270
    Fast and responsive
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 215
    Real-time
  • 191
    JSON
  • 134
    Free
  • 128
    Backed by google
  • 83
    Angular adaptor
  • 68
    Reliable
  • 36
    Great customer support
  • 32
    Great documentation
  • 25
    Real-time synchronization
  • 21
    Mobile friendly
  • 18
    Rapid prototyping
  • 14
    Great security
  • 12
    Automatic scaling
  • 11
    Freakingly awesome
  • 8
    Super fast development
  • 8
    Angularfire is an amazing addition!
  • 8
    Chat
  • 6
    Built in user auth/oauth
  • 6
    Ios adaptor
  • 6
    Awesome next-gen backend
  • 6
    Firebase hosting
  • 4
    Speed of light
  • 4
    Very easy to use
  • 3
    Great
  • 3
    It's made development super fast
  • 3
    Brilliant for startups
  • 2
    The concurrent updates create a great experience
  • 2
    Push notification
  • 2
    .net
  • 2
    Cloud functions
  • 2
    Free hosting
  • 2
    Free authentication solution
  • 2
    JS Offline and Sync suport
  • 2
    Low battery consumption
  • 2
    I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
  • 2
    Great all-round functionality
  • 1
    Large
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Free SSL
  • 1
    Faster workflow
  • 1
    Google's support
  • 1
    CDN & cache out of the box
  • 1
    Easy Reactjs integration
  • 1
    Simple and easy
  • 1
    Good Free Limits
  • 1
    Serverless

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of AWS Device Farm
Cons of Firebase
  • 1
    Records all sessions, blocks on processing when done
  • 1
    You need to remember to turn airplane mode off
  • 31
    Can become expensive
  • 16
    No open source, you depend on external company
  • 15
    Scalability is not infinite
  • 9
    Not Flexible Enough
  • 7
    Cant filter queries
  • 3
    Very unstable server
  • 3
    No Relational Data
  • 2
    Too many errors
  • 2
    No offline sync

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is AWS Device Farm?

Run tests across a large selection of physical devices in parallel from various manufacturers with varying hardware, OS versions and form factors.

What is Firebase?

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use AWS Device Farm?
What companies use Firebase?
See which teams inside your own company are using AWS Device Farm or Firebase.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with AWS Device Farm?
What tools integrate with Firebase?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

GitNode.jsFirebase+5
7
2343
What are some alternatives to AWS Device Farm and Firebase?
Xamarin Test Cloud
Run your app on our huge (and growing) collection of real devices from around the world. Select devices based on form factor, manufacturer, operating system, or even popularity in your target market. We’re adding over 100 devices every month, and if there’s a specific device you need, we’re taking requests.
BrowserStack
BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.
Xamarin
Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.
Sauce Labs
Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.
Kobiton
It enables developers and testers to perform automated and manual testing of mobile apps and websites on real devices. Modern DevOps and Quality environments require apps to be tested on hundreds of device/OS/browser combinations. Managing an in-house device-lab is expensive, resource intensive, restrictive and very manual. Kobiton allows for instant provisioning of real devices for testing with automated or manual scripts, and also allows current on-premise devices to be plugged in to form a holistic testing cloud.
See all alternatives