StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. AWS Fargate vs Google App Engine

AWS Fargate vs Google App Engine

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Stacks10.5K
Followers8.1K
Votes611
AWS Fargate
AWS Fargate
Stacks650
Followers413
Votes0

AWS Fargate vs Google App Engine: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare the key differences between AWS Fargate and Google App Engine. Both Fargate and App Engine are popular platforms for running applications in the cloud. However, they differ in various aspects, including deployment models, scalability, networking, pricing, and customization options.

  1. Deployment Model: AWS Fargate provides a container-as-a-service (CaaS) deployment model, where users have more control and flexibility over their containerized applications. On the other hand, Google App Engine offers a platform-as-a-service (PaaS) deployment model, where the underlying infrastructure and management tasks are abstracted, providing a simpler app-centric development experience.

  2. Scalability: AWS Fargate allows users to scale their applications at a more granular level, as it supports autoscaling at the task level. This means that resources can be allocated based on the demand of individual tasks within a service. In contrast, Google App Engine scales at the instance level, which may result in over-provisioning of resources if certain instances have low utilization.

  3. Networking: AWS Fargate offers more networking options and flexibility compared to Google App Engine. Fargate supports integration with other AWS services, such as Elastic Load Balancer and Virtual Private Cloud (VPC), allowing for more complex network architectures. App Engine, on the other hand, has a simpler networking model, with built-in load balancing and HTTP(S) traffic routing.

  4. Pricing: AWS Fargate pricing is based on the resources consumed by the application, including CPU, memory, and network usage. Users only pay for the actual resources used by their tasks. Google App Engine pricing is based on the number of instances and their respective instance classes. This means that even if instances are underutilized, users still have to pay for the provisioned resources.

  5. Customization Options: AWS Fargate provides more customization options compared to Google App Engine. With Fargate, users have more control over the underlying container infrastructure, including selecting the container runtime and defining task-level resource limits. App Engine, in contrast, abstracts these details, allowing users to focus solely on their application code.

  6. Service Limits: AWS Fargate has higher service limits compared to Google App Engine. This means that Fargate allows for running larger workloads and more concurrent tasks. App Engine, on the other hand, has certain limits on instances, requests, and data storage, which could impact the scalability and performance of applications.

In summary, AWS Fargate and Google App Engine differ in their deployment models, scalability options, networking capabilities, pricing structures, customization levels, and service limits. Each platform has its strengths and is suitable for different types of applications and use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google App Engine
Google App Engine
AWS Fargate
AWS Fargate

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

AWS Fargate is a technology for Amazon ECS and EKS* that allows you to run containers without having to manage servers or clusters. With AWS Fargate, you no longer have to provision, configure, and scale clusters of virtual machines to run containers.

Zero to sixty: Scale your app automatically without worrying about managing machines.;Supercharged APIs: Supercharge your app with services such as Task Queue, XMPP, and Cloud SQL, all powered by the same infrastructure that powers the Google services you use every day.;You're in control: Manage your application with a simple, web-based dashboard allowing you to customize your app's performance.
No clusters to manage; seamless scaling; Integrated with Amazon ECS and EKS
Statistics
Stacks
10.5K
Stacks
650
Followers
8.1K
Followers
413
Votes
611
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 145
    Easy to deploy
  • 106
    Auto scaling
  • 80
    Good free plan
  • 62
    Easy management
  • 56
    Scalability
Cons
  • 2
    Expensive
Integrations
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Twilio
Twilio
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
Docker
Docker
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
AWS IAM
AWS IAM
Amazon VPC
Amazon VPC

What are some alternatives to Google App Engine, AWS Fargate?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Amazon EC2 Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service lets you launch and stop container-enabled applications with simple API calls, allows you to query the state of your cluster from a centralized service, and gives you access to many familiar Amazon EC2 features like security groups, EBS volumes and IAM roles.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Google Kubernetes Engine

Google Kubernetes Engine

Container Engine takes care of provisioning and maintaining the underlying virtual machine cluster, scaling your application, and operational logistics like logging, monitoring, and health management.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot