Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AWS Fargate vs Google App Engine: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will compare the key differences between AWS Fargate and Google App Engine. Both Fargate and App Engine are popular platforms for running applications in the cloud. However, they differ in various aspects, including deployment models, scalability, networking, pricing, and customization options.
Deployment Model: AWS Fargate provides a container-as-a-service (CaaS) deployment model, where users have more control and flexibility over their containerized applications. On the other hand, Google App Engine offers a platform-as-a-service (PaaS) deployment model, where the underlying infrastructure and management tasks are abstracted, providing a simpler app-centric development experience.
Scalability: AWS Fargate allows users to scale their applications at a more granular level, as it supports autoscaling at the task level. This means that resources can be allocated based on the demand of individual tasks within a service. In contrast, Google App Engine scales at the instance level, which may result in over-provisioning of resources if certain instances have low utilization.
Networking: AWS Fargate offers more networking options and flexibility compared to Google App Engine. Fargate supports integration with other AWS services, such as Elastic Load Balancer and Virtual Private Cloud (VPC), allowing for more complex network architectures. App Engine, on the other hand, has a simpler networking model, with built-in load balancing and HTTP(S) traffic routing.
Pricing: AWS Fargate pricing is based on the resources consumed by the application, including CPU, memory, and network usage. Users only pay for the actual resources used by their tasks. Google App Engine pricing is based on the number of instances and their respective instance classes. This means that even if instances are underutilized, users still have to pay for the provisioned resources.
Customization Options: AWS Fargate provides more customization options compared to Google App Engine. With Fargate, users have more control over the underlying container infrastructure, including selecting the container runtime and defining task-level resource limits. App Engine, in contrast, abstracts these details, allowing users to focus solely on their application code.
Service Limits: AWS Fargate has higher service limits compared to Google App Engine. This means that Fargate allows for running larger workloads and more concurrent tasks. App Engine, on the other hand, has certain limits on instances, requests, and data storage, which could impact the scalability and performance of applications.
In summary, AWS Fargate and Google App Engine differ in their deployment models, scalability options, networking capabilities, pricing structures, customization levels, and service limits. Each platform has its strengths and is suitable for different types of applications and use cases.
Pros of AWS Fargate
Pros of Google App Engine
- Easy to deploy145
- Auto scaling106
- Good free plan80
- Easy management62
- Scalability56
- Low cost35
- Comprehensive set of features32
- All services in one place28
- Simple scaling22
- Quick and reliable cloud servers19
- Granular Billing6
- Easy to develop and unit test5
- Monitoring gives comprehensive set of key indicators5
- Really easy to quickly bring up a full stack3
- Create APIs quickly with cloud endpoints3
- No Ops2
- Mostly up2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of AWS Fargate
- Expensive2