Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Azure Container Instances vs Docker: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Azure Container Instances and Docker. Both Azure Container Instances and Docker are popular technologies used for running containerized applications, but they have some fundamental differences that distinguish them from each other.
Container Orchestration: Azure Container Instances (ACI) is a serverless platform that provides a simple way to run containers without managing the underlying infrastructure. It is designed for scenarios where you want to run individual containers easily, without the need for orchestration. On the other hand, Docker is a containerization platform that allows you to build, ship, and run containers, but it requires additional tools and infrastructure to handle container orchestration.
Infrastructure Management: With ACI, you do not need to worry about managing and scaling the infrastructure. Azure takes care of provisioning and managing the necessary resources, allowing you to focus on running your containers. In contrast, Docker requires you to manage and configure the infrastructure on which containers are deployed. You need to set up and maintain the infrastructure using tools like Docker Swarm or Kubernetes.
Pricing Model: ACI offers a pay-per-use pricing model, where you are billed only for the time your containers are running. This makes ACI suitable for applications with unpredictable or variable workloads. On the other hand, Docker follows a subscription-based pricing model, where you pay for the Docker Enterprise Edition license. This model may be more cost-effective for applications with consistent or high-volume workloads.
Networking: ACI provides integrated networking capabilities, allowing containers to communicate with other resources within a virtual network. It also supports the option to expose containers to the public internet. With Docker, you need to configure the networking yourself, either by using the default Docker networking features or integrating with external networking solutions.
Platform Integration: ACI seamlessly integrates with other Azure services, such as Azure Storage and Azure Event Grid. This allows you to easily build applications that leverage the capabilities of different Azure services. Docker, on the other hand, is a standalone platform that can be used with any infrastructure or cloud provider. It does not offer the same level of integration with specific cloud services.
Deployment Flexibility: ACI offers flexibility in terms of deployment options. You can deploy containers directly from Docker Hub, Azure Container Registry, or any other container registry that supports Open Container Initiative (OCI) images. Docker also supports deployment from container registries, but it requires additional configuration and setup to integrate with different container registries.
In summary, Azure Container Instances provides a serverless and managed way to run containers without worrying about infrastructure management or orchestration, while Docker is a more flexible and standalone platform that requires additional tools and setup for container orchestration and infrastructure management.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of Azure Container Instances
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation692
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Easy setup6
- Fast and Portable6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- Highly useful3
- It's dope3
- Package the environment with the application2
- Super2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- Asdfd0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Azure Container Instances
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3