StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Serverless
  4. Serverless Task Processing
  5. Azure Databricks vs Azure Functions

Azure Databricks vs Azure Functions

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Functions
Azure Functions
Stacks785
Followers705
Votes62
Azure Databricks
Azure Databricks
Stacks252
Followers396
Votes0

Azure Databricks vs Azure Functions: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Scalability: Azure Databricks is primarily used for big data processing and machine learning tasks, providing a distributed computing environment to handle large-scale data processing. In contrast, Azure Functions is more suited for executing small code snippets or functions in response to events, allowing for rapid scaling based on demand without managing infrastructure.

  2. Integrated Development Environment (IDE): Azure Databricks offers an integrated workspace for data engineering, collaboration, and visualization through its notebook interface, enabling data scientists and engineers to work efficiently on data projects. On the other hand, Azure Functions do not have a built-in IDE but can be developed and tested locally using Visual Studio or other code editors.

  3. Pricing Model: Azure Databricks follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on resources consumed, offering flexibility for users to scale resources up or down as needed. In contrast, Azure Functions operate on a consumption-based pricing model, where users only pay for the actual number of executions and resources used during the function runs, making it cost-effective for sporadic workloads.

  4. State Management: Azure Databricks provides support for managing stateful computations through its in-memory caching and checkpoint functionality, allowing for iterative algorithms and complex data processing tasks. Conversely, Azure Functions are stateless by design, meant to be ephemeral and stateless compute instances triggered by events, making them suitable for quick, stateless processing tasks.

  5. Language Support: Azure Databricks supports multiple programming languages like Python, Scala, R, and SQL, offering flexibility for data processing and analysis tasks. In comparison, Azure Functions primarily support languages like C#, JavaScript, Python, and Java for writing serverless functions, limiting the language options for function development.

  6. Use Cases: Azure Databricks is well-suited for data engineering, machine learning, and analytics projects that require big data processing capabilities and collaborative development environments. On the other hand, Azure Functions are ideal for event-driven scenarios, serverless computing, and microservices architectures where small pieces of code need to be executed in response to triggering events.

In Summary, Azure Databricks and Azure Functions differ in terms of scalability, IDE offerings, pricing models, state management capabilities, language support, and ideal use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Functions
Azure Functions
Azure Databricks
Azure Databricks

Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.

Accelerate big data analytics and artificial intelligence (AI) solutions with Azure Databricks, a fast, easy and collaborative Apache Spark–based analytics service.

Easily schedule event-driven tasks across services;Expose Functions as HTTP API endpoints;Scale Functions based on customer demand;Develop how you want, using a browser-based UI or existing tools;Get continuous deployment, remote debugging, and authentication out of the box
Optimized Apache Spark environment; Autoscale and auto terminate; Collaborative workspace; Optimized for deep learning; Integration with Azure services; Support for multiple languages and libraries
Statistics
Stacks
785
Stacks
252
Followers
705
Followers
396
Votes
62
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Pay only when invoked
  • 11
    Great developer experience for C#
  • 9
    Multiple languages supported
  • 7
    Great debugging support
  • 5
    Can be used as lightweight https service
Cons
  • 1
    Poor support for Linux environments
  • 1
    Sporadic server & language runtime issues
  • 1
    Not suited for long-running applications
  • 1
    No persistent (writable) file system available
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Java
Java
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Node.js
Node.js
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
GitHub
GitHub
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
JavaScript
JavaScript
Azure Cosmos DB
Azure Cosmos DB
C#
C#
Scala
Scala
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Databricks
Databricks
Python
Python
GitHub
GitHub
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
.NET for Apache Spark
.NET for Apache Spark

What are some alternatives to Azure Functions, Azure Databricks?

Google Analytics

Google Analytics

Google Analytics lets you measure your advertising ROI as well as track your Flash, video, and social networking sites and applications.

Mixpanel

Mixpanel

Mixpanel helps companies build better products through data. With our powerful, self-serve product analytics solution, teams can easily analyze how and why people engage, convert, and retain to improve their user experience.

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.

Piwik

Piwik

Matomo (formerly Piwik) is a full-featured PHP MySQL software program that you download and install on your own webserver. At the end of the five-minute installation process, you will be given a JavaScript code.

Google Cloud Run

Google Cloud Run

A managed compute platform that enables you to run stateless containers that are invocable via HTTP requests. It's serverless by abstracting away all infrastructure management.

Serverless

Serverless

Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.

Clicky

Clicky

Clicky Web Analytics gives bloggers and smaller web sites a more personal understanding of their visitors. Clicky has various features that helps stand it apart from the competition specifically Spy and RSS feeds that allow web site owners to get live information about their visitors.

Google Cloud Functions

Google Cloud Functions

Construct applications from bite-sized business logic billed to the nearest 100 milliseconds, only while your code is running

Knative

Knative

Knative provides a set of middleware components that are essential to build modern, source-centric, and container-based applications that can run anywhere: on premises, in the cloud, or even in a third-party data center

OpenFaaS

OpenFaaS

Serverless Functions Made Simple for Docker and Kubernetes

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase