StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. IDE Tools
  5. Azure DevOps vs Google Cloud Build

Azure DevOps vs Google Cloud Build

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.9K
Votes249
Google Cloud Build
Google Cloud Build
Stacks808
Followers207
Votes4

Azure DevOps vs Google Cloud Build: What are the differences?

Introduction

Azure DevOps and Google Cloud Build are two popular platforms used for managing and automating the software development lifecycle. While both platforms offer similar functionalities, there are some key differences that set them apart.

  1. Pricing Model: Azure DevOps follows a tier-based pricing model that includes a free tier with limited features and paid plans based on the number of users. On the other hand, Google Cloud Build offers a flexible pricing model based on usage, allowing users to pay for only the resources they consume.

  2. Integration with Cloud Services: Azure DevOps is tightly integrated with Microsoft Azure's cloud services, providing seamless integration and direct access to Azure resources for building, deploying, and managing applications. In contrast, Google Cloud Build is designed to work with Google Cloud Platform (GCP) services, offering native integration with GCP services and resources.

  3. Build Environment: Azure DevOps provides a customizable build environment that allows users to define their own build agents and tools, enabling flexibility in building and deploying applications. Google Cloud Build, on the other hand, uses pre-defined build environments based on containers, offering a more standardized approach to building applications.

  4. Supported Version Control Systems: Azure DevOps supports both Git and Team Foundation Version Control (TFVC), providing flexibility for developers to choose their preferred version control system. In contrast, Google Cloud Build primarily supports Git as the version control system, limiting the options for developers who prefer TFVC.

  5. Access Control and Permissions: Azure DevOps offers robust access control and permission settings, allowing users to define fine-grained access controls for various parts of the platform. Google Cloud Build provides basic access control capabilities, but it may not offer the same level of granularity and control as Azure DevOps.

  6. Third-Party Integration: Azure DevOps has a wide range of integrations with third-party tools and services, allowing users to seamlessly connect and integrate their development and deployment workflows. Google Cloud Build also has some integrations, but it may not have the same extensive ecosystem of integrations as Azure DevOps.

In summary, Azure DevOps and Google Cloud Build differ in their pricing model, integration with cloud services, build environment approach, supported version control systems, access control and permissions, and third-party integration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Google Cloud Build
Google Cloud Build

Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.

Cloud Build lets you build software quickly across all languages. Get complete control over defining custom workflows for building, testing, and deploying across multiple environments such as VMs, serverless, Kubernetes, or Firebase.

Agile Tools: kanban boards, backlogs, scrum boards; Reporting: dashboards, widgets, Power BI; Git: free private repositories, pull requests; Continuous Integration: automated builds and diagnostics; Cloud build agents: cross-platform agents for Windows, Mac and Linux; Testing Tools: unit testing, load testing, manual, exploratory and user acceptance testing; Release Management: automate deployments, gated approval workflows, audit trails; Marketplace: extensions for the Visual Studio family of products; Package Management: host npm and NuGet packages; IDE Support: Eclipse, IntelliJ, Xcode and Visual Studio; Integration: link code and releases to work items, builds, and test results
Commit to deploy in minutes; Choose what to build; Extremely fast builds; Automate your deployments; Define your custom workflow; Unparalleled privacy; Native Docker support; Generous free tier; Powerful insights; Identify vulnerabilities; Build locally or in the cloud
Statistics
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
808
Followers
2.9K
Followers
207
Votes
249
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 56
    Complete and powerful
  • 32
    Huge extension ecosystem
  • 27
    Azure integration
  • 26
    Flexible and powerful
  • 26
    One Stop Shop For Build server, Project Mgt, CDCI
Cons
  • 8
    Still dependant on C# for agents
  • 5
    Half Baked
  • 5
    Many in devops disregard MS altogether
  • 4
    Not a requirements management tool
  • 4
    Capacity across cross functional teams not visibile
Pros
  • 2
    GCP easy integration
  • 2
    Container based
Cons
  • 2
    Vendor lock-in
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Docker
Docker
Slack
Slack
Trello
Trello
Git
Git
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Jenkins
Jenkins
Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy
Eclipse
Eclipse
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Azure DevOps, Google Cloud Build?

Trello

Trello

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.

Asana

Asana

Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.

Buddy

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

Basecamp

Basecamp

Basecamp is a project management and group collaboration tool. The tool includes features for schedules, tasks, files, and messages.

Confluence

Confluence

Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.

Redmine

Redmine

Redmine is a flexible project management web application. Written using the Ruby on Rails framework, it is cross-platform and cross-database.

Taskulu

Taskulu

Taskulu is a collaborative project planning service. It combines task management, real-time chat and time tracking into a single interface.

Notion

Notion

A new tool that blends your everyday work apps into one. It's a unified and collaborative workspace for you and your team

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana