Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Azure DevOps vs OpenStack: What are the differences?
Azure DevOps vs OpenStack
Introduction
This article compares Azure DevOps and OpenStack, focusing on their key differences. Azure DevOps is a comprehensive suite of tools that enables development teams to plan, develop, test, and deliver software. On the other hand, OpenStack is an open-source platform for building and managing public and private clouds.
Integration with Third-party Tools: Azure DevOps provides seamless integration with popular development tools such as GitHub, Jenkins, and Slack. It allows teams to leverage their existing tools and workflows while seamlessly incorporating Azure DevOps features. In contrast, OpenStack offers limited integration options and may require custom development to integrate with third-party tools.
Scalability and Flexibility: Azure DevOps is a cloud-based service provided by Microsoft, offering high scalability and flexibility. It can easily handle large-scale projects and can be dynamically adjusted according to the team's needs. OpenStack, being an on-premises solution, requires significant infrastructure planning and maintenance to scale and accommodate growing demands.
Service Offerings: Azure DevOps provides a wide range of services, including version control, continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD), project management, and automated testing. It offers an all-in-one solution for end-to-end software development. In contrast, OpenStack primarily focuses on infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) and provides a foundation to build and manage cloud infrastructure. It lacks some of the specialized services offered by Azure DevOps.
Ease of Use: Azure DevOps is designed with a user-friendly interface and provides intuitive tools that are easy to navigate. It offers a simple and streamlined experience for developers and non-technical users alike. On the other hand, OpenStack has a steeper learning curve and requires more technical expertise to set up and manage. It may be more suitable for experienced IT professionals.
Vendor Lock-In: Azure DevOps is a proprietary tool provided by Microsoft, which may result in vendor lock-in. Although it offers significant benefits and integration with other Microsoft services, it may limit the flexibility to migrate to other platforms in the future. In contrast, OpenStack is an open-source platform, providing vendors with the freedom to implement and customize it according to their needs. It offers more flexibility to move between different infrastructure providers.
Community Support: Azure DevOps benefits from the extensive support and resources provided by Microsoft and its large community. It has a vast knowledge base, documentation, and active user forums for troubleshooting and assistance. OpenStack also has a supportive community with active contributors, but the resources and support may not be as extensive as Azure DevOps due to its smaller user base.
In summary, Azure DevOps provides superior integration options, scalability, and a comprehensive suite of services, making it more suitable for end-to-end software development. OpenStack, while offering flexibility and customization, has limitations in terms of integration, ease of use, and specialized services.
Pros of Azure DevOps
- Complete and powerful56
- Huge extension ecosystem32
- Azure integration27
- Flexible and powerful26
- One Stop Shop For Build server, Project Mgt, CDCI26
- Everything I need. Simple and intuitive UI15
- Support Open Source13
- Integrations8
- GitHub Integration7
- Cost free for Stakeholders6
- One 4 all6
- Crap6
- Project Mgmt Features6
- Runs in the cloud5
- Agent On-Premise(Linux - Windows)3
- Aws integration2
- Link Test Cases to Stories2
- Jenkins Integration2
- GCP Integration1
Pros of OpenStack
- Private cloud60
- Avoid vendor lock-in39
- Flexible in use23
- Industry leader7
- Robust architecture5
- Supported by many companies in top5004
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Azure DevOps
- Still dependant on C# for agents8
- Half Baked5
- Many in devops disregard MS altogether5
- Not a requirements management tool4
- Jack of all trades, master of none4
- Capacity across cross functional teams not visibile4
- Poor Jenkins integration3
- Tedious for test plan/case creation2
- Switching accounts is impossible1