Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Azure DevOps vs Puppet Labs: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will compare the key differences between Azure DevOps and Puppet Labs. Both Azure DevOps and Puppet Labs are widely used in the field of software development and deployment. However, they have distinct features and functionalities that set them apart from each other.
Integration and Scope: Azure DevOps provides a comprehensive set of integrated tools that cover the full development lifecycle, including project management, version control, build and release pipelines, and testing. On the other hand, Puppet Labs focuses primarily on infrastructure automation and configuration management, helping organizations to easily manage and scale their IT infrastructure.
Deployment Model: Azure DevOps follows a cloud-based deployment model, allowing users to leverage the power of the Azure cloud platform for seamless integration and scalability. In contrast, Puppet Labs can be deployed both on-premises and in the cloud, giving users the flexibility to choose their preferred deployment scenario.
Development Focus: Azure DevOps focuses on providing a collaborative environment for developers, enabling them to efficiently plan, develop, test, and release software applications. It offers features like Agile project management, code version control, and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. On the other hand, Puppet Labs focuses on infrastructure automation and configuration management, allowing users to define and enforce desired system configurations using Infrastructure as Code (IaC) principles.
Supported Technologies: Azure DevOps supports a wide range of technologies and programming languages, making it suitable for diverse development projects. It seamlessly integrates with popular code repositories like Git, supports multiple programming languages, and allows for extensibility through various extensions and integrations. Puppet Labs, on the other hand, is primarily focused on configuration management and automation of server infrastructure and supports various operating systems and platforms.
Ease of Use: Azure DevOps provides an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easy for developers to adopt and work with the platform. It offers features like drag-and-drop pipeline creation, visual project management boards, and real-time collaboration tools. In comparison, Puppet Labs has a steeper learning curve and requires a solid understanding of configuration management concepts and Puppet-specific syntax.
Cost: Azure DevOps offers multiple pricing tiers, including free options for small teams and enterprises. The pricing is based on the number of users and resources utilized. Puppet Labs also provides various pricing options, but the overall cost may depend on the scale and complexity of the infrastructure being managed, as well as additional services and support required.
In summary, Azure DevOps and Puppet Labs differ in terms of their integration and scope, deployment model, development focus, supported technologies, ease of use, and cost. Depending on the specific requirements of an organization, one solution may be a better fit than the other.
I'm just getting started using Vagrant to help automate setting up local VMs to set up a Kubernetes cluster (development and experimentation only). (Yes, I do know about minikube)
I'm looking for a tool to help install software packages, setup users, etc..., on these VMs. I'm also fairly new to Ansible, Chef, and Puppet. What's a good one to start with to learn? I might decide to try all 3 at some point for my own curiosity.
The most important factors for me are simplicity, ease of use, shortest learning curve.
I have been working with Puppet and Ansible. The reason why I prefer ansible is the distribution of it. Ansible is more lightweight and therefore more popular. This leads to situations, where you can get fully packaged applications for ansible (e.g. confluent) supported by the vendor, but only incomplete packages for Puppet.
The only advantage I would see with Puppet if someone wants to use Foreman. This is still better supported with Puppet.
If you are just starting out, might as well learn Kubernetes There's a lot of tools that come with Kube that make it easier to use and most importantly: you become cloud-agnostic. We use Ansible because it's a lot simpler than Chef or Puppet and if you use Docker Compose for your deployments you can re-use them with Kubernetes later when you migrate
Pros of Azure DevOps
- Complete and powerful56
- Huge extension ecosystem32
- Azure integration27
- Flexible and powerful26
- One Stop Shop For Build server, Project Mgt, CDCI26
- Everything I need. Simple and intuitive UI15
- Support Open Source13
- Integrations8
- GitHub Integration7
- Cost free for Stakeholders6
- One 4 all6
- Crap6
- Project Mgmt Features6
- Runs in the cloud5
- Agent On-Premise(Linux - Windows)3
- Aws integration2
- Link Test Cases to Stories2
- Jenkins Integration2
- GCP Integration1
Pros of Puppet Labs
- Devops52
- Automate it44
- Reusable components26
- Dynamic and idempotent server configuration21
- Great community18
- Very scalable12
- Cloud management12
- Easy to maintain10
- Free tier9
- Works with Amazon EC26
- Declarative4
- Ruby4
- Works with Azure3
- Works with OpenStack3
- Nginx2
- Ease of use1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Azure DevOps
- Still dependant on C# for agents8
- Half Baked5
- Many in devops disregard MS altogether5
- Not a requirements management tool4
- Jack of all trades, master of none4
- Capacity across cross functional teams not visibile4
- Poor Jenkins integration3
- Tedious for test plan/case creation2
- Switching accounts is impossible1
Cons of Puppet Labs
- Steep learning curve3
- Customs types idempotence1