StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Test Studio vs behave

Test Studio vs behave

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

behave
behave
Stacks67
Followers119
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.4K
Forks656
Test Studio
Test Studio
Stacks2
Followers17
Votes0
GitHub Stars2
Forks11

Test Studio vs behave: What are the differences?

  1. License: Test Studio requires a license to use, while behave is an open-source software under the MIT license, allowing it to be freely used and modified without any restrictions.
  2. Language Support: Test Studio is primarily designed to work with Microsoft technologies and supports languages like C# and VB.NET, whereas behave is written in Python and is more suitable for Python-based projects.
  3. User Interface: Test Studio provides a user-friendly graphical interface for creating and managing tests, whereas behave uses a plain text, natural language format called Gherkin to define tests, making it more accessible to non-technical stakeholders.
  4. Integration: Test Studio integrates seamlessly with Visual Studio and TFS for source control and management, while behave can be easily integrated with other tools through plugins and extensions, making it more versatile in different development environments.
  5. Automation Approach: Test Studio focuses on record and playback automation, making it ideal for quick test creation but less flexible for complex scenarios, while behave promotes a behavior-driven development (BDD) approach, encouraging collaboration between technical and non-technical team members to define tests with a focus on the system's behavior.
  6. Community Support: Test Studio has dedicated support from Telerik, the company behind the product, providing regular updates and technical assistance, while behave benefits from a large community of open-source contributors, offering a wealth of resources, tutorials, and plugins for users.

In Summary, Test Studio and behave differ in their licensing, language support, user interface, integration capabilities, automation approach, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

behave
behave
Test Studio
Test Studio

It is behaviour-driven development, Python style. It uses tests written in a natural language style, backed up by Python code.

It is a Windows-based software testing tool for web and desktop functional testing, software performance testing, load testing and mobile application testing. The tool ships with a plugin for Visual Studio and a standalone app that use the same repositories and file formats.

bdd; tests; tdd
Script-less test recording and playback; Cross-browser test execution – Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome and Safari (web browser); Support for HTML, AJAX, Silverlight, WPF and ASP.NET MVC application testing; Element abstraction and reuse.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.4K
GitHub Stars
2
GitHub Forks
656
GitHub Forks
11
Stacks
67
Stacks
2
Followers
119
Followers
17
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Python
Python
Django
Django
Flask
Flask
Testrail
Testrail
FogBugz
FogBugz
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
Sentry
Sentry
Jira
Jira
TestFairy
TestFairy
Instabug
Instabug
HipTest
HipTest

What are some alternatives to behave, Test Studio?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana