Overview

BrowserStack

Stacks2.7K

Followers2.0K

Votes533

BitBar

Stacks71

Followers127

Votes46

BitBar vs BrowserStack: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this markdown document, we will discuss the key differences between BitBar and BrowserStack.

Pricing Model: BitBar uses a subscription-based pricing model, offering various packages based on the number of devices and features required. On the other hand, BrowserStack offers a pay-per-minute pricing model, allowing users to pay only for the usage duration, making it more cost-effective for short-term testing needs.
Device Support: BitBar provides a wide range of real devices for testing purposes, including smartphones, tablets, and smart TVs, covering both Android and iOS platforms. In contrast, BrowserStack offers an even larger device and browser coverage, including desktops and additional operating systems like Windows, macOS, and Linux.
Testing Environment: BitBar primarily provides a cloud-based testing environment where users can access real devices remotely, making it convenient for sharing testing resources among team members. On the other hand, BrowserStack not only offers a cloud-based testing environment but also provides an option for local testing by connecting physical devices via their Local Testing feature.
Browser Automation: BitBar allows users to perform browser automation using frameworks like Appium and Selenium. However, BitBar mainly focuses on mobile app testing, so the browser automation capabilities are more limited compared to BrowserStack. BrowserStack, on the other hand, provides extensive support for browser automation with frameworks like Selenium, Cypress, and Puppeteer, making it suitable for both web and mobile app testing.
Accessibility and Localization Testing: BitBar offers basic accessibility and localization testing features, allowing users to test their applications' compatibility with different languages and complying with accessibility standards partially. In contrast, BrowserStack provides more comprehensive accessibility and localization testing capabilities, including support for keyboard navigation, screen readers, and checking the application's behavior in various languages.
Integration and Collaboration: Both BitBar and BrowserStack offer integrations with popular CI/CD tools, making it easy to incorporate automated testing into the development workflow. However, BrowserStack provides more extensive integrations with a larger number of tools and platforms like Jenkins, Docker, and Jira. Additionally, BrowserStack offers advanced collaboration features, allowing teams to share test results, add annotations, and collaborate in real-time during testing sessions.

In summary, BitBar and BrowserStack differ in their pricing model, device support, testing environments, browser automation capabilities, accessibility and localization testing features, and integration and collaboration options.

Advice on BrowserStack, BitBar

Rinchin

Jul 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Selenium

Sauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

217k views217k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

BrowserStack	BitBar
BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.	Testdroid provides a set of products for Android and iOS app/game testing on real devices. With different testing solutions, you can efficiently develop and test your mobile apps/games in agile way and achieve your business goals.
Get instant access to 20,000+ real mobile devices and browsers, which include real iOS and Android devices, Chrome, IE, Firefox, Safari; Test websites hosted on internal dev and staging environments with zero setup or configuration; Run hundreds of tests concurrently to speed up the execution time of your test suite by more than 10x	Achieve agile testing and continuous integration;Save costs and time in app development;Test apps/games online on hundreds of real Android and iOS devices;Support most of the popluar test automation frameworks;Check and analyze screenshots, CPU & memory usage, exceptions and logcats;24/5 (Mon-Fri) live support
Statistics
Stacks 2.7K	Stacks 71
Followers 2.0K	Followers 127
Votes 533	Votes 46
Pros & Cons
Pros 135 Multiple browsers 76 Ease of use 65 Real browsers 44 Ability to use it locally 27 Good price Cons 2 Very limited choice of minor versions	Pros 9 Best support 8 The most robust service 7 Best deployment options (private, public, in-house) 6 Best coverage of devices globally 4 Support for all major test automation frameworks
Integrations
Cypress QMetry Jira WordPress Shopify Zapier Drone.io Jenkins Slack GitLab	Jira Jenkins

What are some alternatives to BrowserStack, BitBar?

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Testrail

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.