StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. BitKeeper vs Bitbucket

BitKeeper vs Bitbucket

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Stacks41.1K
Followers33.4K
Votes2.8K
BitKeeper
BitKeeper
Stacks3
Followers18
Votes0

BitKeeper vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?

## Introduction
In this comparison, we will analyze the key differences between BitKeeper and Bitbucket.

1. **Version Control System**: BitKeeper is a distributed version control system primarily used for managing source code repositories, while Bitbucket is a web-based version control repository hosting service that utilizes Git and Mercurial as version control systems.
   
2. **Pricing Model**: BitKeeper offers a free version for open source projects and small teams, with subscription-based pricing for larger teams and enterprise use. On the other hand, Bitbucket provides free unlimited private repositories for small teams of up to 5 users and offers paid plans for larger teams and enterprise customers.

3. **Integration with Other Tools**: BitKeeper is known for its seamless integration with popular development tools such as Jenkins, JIRA, and Visual Studio, providing a holistic development environment. Bitbucket, being a part of the Atlassian suite, offers tight integration with JIRA, Bamboo, and other Atlassian products, facilitating an end-to-end software development workflow.

4. **Collaboration Features**: BitKeeper focuses on offering a streamlined collaboration experience through features like code reviews, inline commenting, and pull requests. In contrast, Bitbucket emphasizes collaboration by providing features like pull requests, branching strategies, and integrations with communication tools like Slack and HipChat.

5. **Support for Large Files**: BitKeeper is well-suited for managing large files and repositories efficiently, making it a preferred choice for projects with multimedia assets or extensive data. Bitbucket, while handling binary files adequately, may face limitations in managing very large files due to its architecture and size restrictions.

6. **Customization and Extensibility**: BitKeeper allows for a high degree of customization and extensibility, enabling users to tailor the tool to their specific workflow and requirements through scripting and plugins. Bitbucket, being part of the Atlassian ecosystem, provides a wide range of integrations and extensions but may have limitations in terms of customized scripting and deep tool modifications.

## Summary
In summary, BitKeeper and Bitbucket differ in terms of version control system, pricing model, integration with other tools, collaboration features, support for large files, and customization and extensibility options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, BitKeeper

Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M
Comments
Elmar
Elmar

CEO, Managing Director at Wouters Media

Nov 9, 2020

Decided

I first used BitBucket because it had private repo's, and it didn't disappoint me. Also with the smooth integration of Jira, the decision to use BitBucket as a full application maintenance service was as easy as 1, 2, 3.

I honestly love BitBucket, by the looks, by the UI, and the smooth integration with Tower.

586k views586k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket
Bitbucket
BitKeeper
BitKeeper

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

BitKeeper is a fast, enterprise-ready, distributed SCM that scales up to very large projects and down to tiny ones.

Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial
Simple: An easy to use command line interface.;Scalable: Nested Repositories are submodules done right! Version control collections of repositories.;Flexible: Hybrid mode for binary files that uses a cloud of server for binaries instead of bloating the source repositories.;Accurate: Tracking of file operations like creates, deletes, and renames.;Safe: All file accesses validate checksums for integrity. All file writes include redundancy for error correction.;Dependable: Highly accurate auto-merge that uses the whole history to resolve conflicts. Most other systems use variations of diff3.;Discernable: Source annotations instantly available.;Fast: High performance and scales to very large repositories.;Free: Licensed under the Apache Version 2 license
Statistics
Stacks
41.1K
Stacks
3
Followers
33.4K
Followers
18
Votes
2.8K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 905
    Free private repos
  • 397
    Simple setup
  • 349
    Nice ui and tools
  • 342
    Unlimited private repositories
  • 240
    Affordable git hosting
Cons
  • 19
    Not much community activity
  • 17
    Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui
  • 15
    Quite buggy
  • 10
    Managed by enterprise Java company
  • 8
    CI tool is not free of charge
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Git
Git
AWS Cloud9
AWS Cloud9
Sentry
Sentry
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
npm
npm
Trello
Trello
Slack
Slack
Confluence
Confluence
Docker
Docker
Jira
Jira
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, BitKeeper?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Git

Git

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Mercurial

Mercurial

Mercurial is dedicated to speed and efficiency with a sane user interface. It is written in Python. Mercurial's implementation and data structures are designed to be fast. You can generate diffs between revisions, or jump back in time within seconds.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana