Bitbucket vs Coverity Scan

Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

Coverity Scan

Stacks50

Followers185

Votes0

Bitbucket vs Coverity Scan: What are the differences?

Integration with Version Control: Bitbucket is a version control system that allows for easy integration with Git repositories, enabling teams to collaborate efficiently on code. On the other hand, Coverity Scan is a static analysis tool that focuses on identifying security vulnerabilities and issues within the codebase.
Code Quality Analysis: Bitbucket provides basic code review and integration with tools like Bamboo for continuous integration. Coverity Scan, however, specializes in in-depth code analysis, detecting complex security issues and potential bugs in the code.
Scalability: Bitbucket is designed for teams of all sizes and has scalable pricing plans based on the number of users. Coverity Scan is geared towards larger organizations with complex codebases, offering enterprise-grade features for comprehensive code analysis.
Supported Languages: Bitbucket supports a wide range of programming languages, making it versatile for different types of projects. Coverity Scan, on the other hand, is more focused on specific languages like C, C++, Java, and C#, providing tailored analysis for these languages.
Focus on Security: Coverity Scan emphasizes security by performing in-depth static analysis to identify security vulnerabilities and potential exploits in the code. Bitbucket, while offering basic security features, does not specialize in the same level of detailed security analysis.
Ease of Use: Bitbucket is known for its user-friendly interface and ease of use, making it accessible to users of all skill levels. Coverity Scan, being a specialized static analysis tool, may have a steeper learning curve and require specific expertise to utilize effectively.

In Summary, Bitbucket focuses on version control and collaboration, while Coverity Scan specializes in comprehensive code analysis with a focus on security and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, Coverity Scan

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Elmar

CEO, Managing Director at Wouters Media

Nov 9, 2020

Decided

I first used BitBucket because it had private repo's, and it didn't disappoint me. Also with the smooth integration of Jira, the decision to use BitBucket as a full application maintenance service was as easy as 1, 2, 3.

I honestly love BitBucket, by the looks, by the UI, and the smooth integration with Tower.

586k views586k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	Coverity Scan
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	Coverity's implementation of static analysis can follow all the possible paths of execution through source code (including interprocedurally) and find defects and vulnerabilities caused by the conjunction of statements that are not errors independent of each other.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	Test every line of code and potential execution path.;The root cause of each defect is clearly explained, making it easy to fix bugs;Integrates with GitHub and Travis CI
Statistics
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 50
Followers 33.4K	Followers 185
Votes 2.8K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	GitHub Travis CI

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, Coverity Scan?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs Coverity Scan: What are the differences?

Integration with Version Control: Bitbucket is a version control system that allows for easy integration with Git repositories, enabling teams to collaborate efficiently on code. On the other hand, Coverity Scan is a static analysis tool that focuses on identifying security vulnerabilities and issues within the codebase.
Code Quality Analysis: Bitbucket provides basic code review and integration with tools like Bamboo for continuous integration. Coverity Scan, however, specializes in in-depth code analysis, detecting complex security issues and potential bugs in the code.
Scalability: Bitbucket is designed for teams of all sizes and has scalable pricing plans based on the number of users. Coverity Scan is geared towards larger organizations with complex codebases, offering enterprise-grade features for comprehensive code analysis.
Supported Languages: Bitbucket supports a wide range of programming languages, making it versatile for different types of projects. Coverity Scan, on the other hand, is more focused on specific languages like C, C++, Java, and C#, providing tailored analysis for these languages.
Focus on Security: Coverity Scan emphasizes security by performing in-depth static analysis to identify security vulnerabilities and potential exploits in the code. Bitbucket, while offering basic security features, does not specialize in the same level of detailed security analysis.
Ease of Use: Bitbucket is known for its user-friendly interface and ease of use, making it accessible to users of all skill levels. Coverity Scan, being a specialized static analysis tool, may have a steeper learning curve and require specific expertise to utilize effectively.

In Summary, Bitbucket focuses on version control and collaboration, while Coverity Scan specializes in comprehensive code analysis with a focus on security and scalability.

Bitbucket vs Coverity Scan

Overview