Bitbucket vs GitHub Enterprise

Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

GitHub Enterprise

Stacks500

Followers627

Votes10

Bitbucket vs GitHub Enterprise: What are the differences?

GitHub Enterprise and Bitbucket are both popular platforms used for version control and collaboration on software development projects. While they have similar functionalities, there are key differences between them that make each platform unique.

Ownership and Pricing: GitHub Enterprise is owned by Microsoft and requires a paid license to use, while Bitbucket is owned by Atlassian and offers a free tier for small teams. This difference in ownership and pricing structure can influence the choice of platform for organizations with varying needs and budgets.
Integration with Other Tools: GitHub Enterprise has a wider range of integrations with popular development tools and services, such as Jenkins and Slack, compared to Bitbucket. This broader integration capability can enhance the overall workflow and productivity of development teams using GitHub Enterprise.
Code Limitations: GitHub Enterprise has a higher limit on the size of repositories and files that can be stored, whereas Bitbucket has smaller limits. This can be a crucial factor for projects that involve large files or extensive codebases.
Access Control and Permissions: Bitbucket provides more granular access control and permission settings compared to GitHub Enterprise. This allows administrators to define specific user roles and restrict access to certain repositories or branches, providing a higher level of security and control over the codebase.
Deployment Options: GitHub Enterprise offers both cloud-based and on-premises deployment options, allowing organizations to choose the hosting environment that best fits their requirements. Bitbucket, on the other hand, primarily operates as a cloud-based service.
Community Support: GitHub Enterprise has a larger and more active community of developers compared to Bitbucket, resulting in a wider range of resources, tutorials, and support available. This can be beneficial for developers who rely on community-driven assistance and collaboration.

In Summary, GitHub Enterprise offers more extensive integrations, larger code limits, and a larger community, while Bitbucket provides more granular access control, a free tier, and primarily operates as a cloud-based service. Organizations should consider these key differences when choosing between the two platforms for their software development needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, GitHub Enterprise

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Elmar

CEO, Managing Director at Wouters Media

Nov 9, 2020

Decided

I first used BitBucket because it had private repo's, and it didn't disappoint me. Also with the smooth integration of Jira, the decision to use BitBucket as a full application maintenance service was as easy as 1, 2, 3.

I honestly love BitBucket, by the looks, by the UI, and the smooth integration with Tower.

586k views586k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	GitHub Enterprise
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	Compliance and auditing;Hundreds of integrations;Flexible deployment;Centralized permissions;Powerful dashboards;Technical support
Statistics
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 500
Followers 33.4K	Followers 627
Votes 2.8K	Votes 10
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	Pros 4 Expensive - $$$ 2 Code security 2 CDCI with Github Actions 1 Draft Pull Request 1 Both Cloud and Enterprise Server Versions available Cons 2 $$$
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, GitHub Enterprise?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub Enterprise: What are the differences?

Ownership and Pricing: GitHub Enterprise is owned by Microsoft and requires a paid license to use, while Bitbucket is owned by Atlassian and offers a free tier for small teams. This difference in ownership and pricing structure can influence the choice of platform for organizations with varying needs and budgets.
Integration with Other Tools: GitHub Enterprise has a wider range of integrations with popular development tools and services, such as Jenkins and Slack, compared to Bitbucket. This broader integration capability can enhance the overall workflow and productivity of development teams using GitHub Enterprise.
Code Limitations: GitHub Enterprise has a higher limit on the size of repositories and files that can be stored, whereas Bitbucket has smaller limits. This can be a crucial factor for projects that involve large files or extensive codebases.
Access Control and Permissions: Bitbucket provides more granular access control and permission settings compared to GitHub Enterprise. This allows administrators to define specific user roles and restrict access to certain repositories or branches, providing a higher level of security and control over the codebase.
Deployment Options: GitHub Enterprise offers both cloud-based and on-premises deployment options, allowing organizations to choose the hosting environment that best fits their requirements. Bitbucket, on the other hand, primarily operates as a cloud-based service.
Community Support: GitHub Enterprise has a larger and more active community of developers compared to Bitbucket, resulting in a wider range of resources, tutorials, and support available. This can be beneficial for developers who rely on community-driven assistance and collaboration.

Bitbucket vs GitHub Enterprise

Overview