Bitbucket vs go-git

Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

go-git

Stacks10

Followers15

Votes0

GitHub Stars4.9K

Forks535

Bitbucket vs go-git: What are the differences?

Introduction: Here are the key differences between Bitbucket and go-git:

1. Hosting Service vs. Library: Bitbucket is a hosting service for Git repositories, providing features like issue tracking, pull requests, and pipelines, while go-git is a Git library for Go programming language, allowing developers to interact with Git repositories programmatically.

2. Online Collaboration vs. Local Repository Management: Bitbucket is designed for online collaboration, allowing multiple users to work on the same repository simultaneously, whereas go-git is focused on managing local repositories and providing tools for manipulating Git objects within a program.

3. Graphical User Interface vs. Command Line Interface: Bitbucket offers a graphical user interface for interacting with repositories, making it easier for users to perform Git operations visually, while go-git requires developers to use a command-line interface or write code to interact with Git repositories programmatically.

4. Built-in Features vs. Customization: Bitbucket comes with built-in features like pull requests, issue tracking, and integrations with other tools, offering a comprehensive platform for software development, while go-git provides a more customizable approach, allowing developers to tailor their Git workflows according to their specific requirements.

5. Cloud-based vs. Self-hosted: Bitbucket is a cloud-based service, meaning that repositories are hosted on Atlassian's servers, allowing for easy access and collaboration from anywhere, while go-git can be used to create self-hosted Git solutions, providing more control over data storage and security measures.

6. Webhooks and Integrations vs. lower-level Git Operations: Bitbucket offers webhooks and integrations with other services, enabling automation and workflow enhancements, while go-git focuses more on lower-level Git operations, such as commit manipulation, tree traversal, and object reading and writing.

In Summary, Bitbucket is a hosting service with online collaboration features, graphical user interface, built-in tools, and cloud-based hosting, while go-git is a Git library for Go with a focus on local repository management, command-line interface, customization, self-hosting, and lower-level Git operations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, go-git

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	go-git
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	A low level and highly extensible git client library for reading repositories from git servers. It is written in Go from scratch, without any C dependencies.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 4.9K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 535
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 10
Followers 33.4K	Followers 15
Votes 2.8K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	Git

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, go-git?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Bitbucket vs go-git

Overview