Bitbucket vs LGTM

Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

LGTM

Stacks11

Followers26

Votes0

GitHub Stars989

Forks125

Bitbucket vs LGTM: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In the world of software development, tools like Bitbucket and LGTM play a vital role in version control and code review processes. Below are the key differences between Bitbucket and LGTM.

Hosting Platforms: Bitbucket is a Git repository management solution that provides both cloud-based and self-hosted options, making it suitable for teams of different sizes. On the other hand, LGTM is a cloud-based static code analysis tool that does not offer self-hosted deployment, catering primarily to teams looking for a cloud-based solution.
Code Review Focus: Bitbucket offers code hosting, version control, and extensive code collaboration features, with code review being one of its core functionalities. LGTM, on the other hand, focuses solely on static code analysis and automated code review processes, providing insights and recommendations to improve code quality.
Integration with Other Tools: Bitbucket integrates seamlessly with a wide range of third-party tools and services, such as JIRA, Bamboo, and Slack, enhancing its functionality and adaptability to different development environments. LGTM also offers integrations with popular tools like GitHub, enabling users to incorporate its static code analysis capabilities into their existing workflows.
Pricing Model: Bitbucket offers a freemium pricing model with free and paid plans based on the number of users and storage requirements, making it suitable for both small startups and larger enterprises. LGTM, on the other hand, follows a subscription-based pricing model, providing various tiers for organizations to choose from based on their specific needs and usage.
Focus on Security: Bitbucket emphasizes security features such as SSH key management, IP whitelisting, and two-factor authentication to protect sensitive code repositories and ensure secure collaboration within teams. While LGTM also prioritizes security, its focus is more on code quality and vulnerability detection through static code analysis.
Support for Multiple Programming Languages: Bitbucket supports various programming languages and frameworks, offering flexibility for teams working on diverse projects. In contrast, LGTM specializes in providing advanced analysis for specific languages like C, C++, JavaScript, and Python, optimizing its capabilities for in-depth code inspection and quality assurance in those areas.

In Summary, Bitbucket and LGTM offer distinctive features and functionalities tailored to different aspects of the software development process, catering to a wide range of developer needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, LGTM

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Elmar

CEO, Managing Director at Wouters Media

Nov 9, 2020

Decided

I first used BitBucket because it had private repo's, and it didn't disappoint me. Also with the smooth integration of Jira, the decision to use BitBucket as a full application maintenance service was as easy as 1, 2, 3.

I honestly love BitBucket, by the looks, by the UI, and the smooth integration with Tower.

586k views586k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	LGTM
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	LGTM is a simple pull request approval system using GitHub protected branches and maintainers files. Pull requests are locked and cannot be merged until the minimum number of approvals are received. Project maintainers can indicate their approval by commenting on the pull request and including LGTM (looks good to me) in their approval text.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	Unparalleled security analysis; Automated code review; Free for open source; Deep semantic code search
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 989
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 125
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 11
Followers 33.4K	Followers 26
Votes 2.8K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	GitHub

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, LGTM?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs LGTM: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In the world of software development, tools like Bitbucket and LGTM play a vital role in version control and code review processes. Below are the key differences between Bitbucket and LGTM.

Hosting Platforms: Bitbucket is a Git repository management solution that provides both cloud-based and self-hosted options, making it suitable for teams of different sizes. On the other hand, LGTM is a cloud-based static code analysis tool that does not offer self-hosted deployment, catering primarily to teams looking for a cloud-based solution.
Code Review Focus: Bitbucket offers code hosting, version control, and extensive code collaboration features, with code review being one of its core functionalities. LGTM, on the other hand, focuses solely on static code analysis and automated code review processes, providing insights and recommendations to improve code quality.
Integration with Other Tools: Bitbucket integrates seamlessly with a wide range of third-party tools and services, such as JIRA, Bamboo, and Slack, enhancing its functionality and adaptability to different development environments. LGTM also offers integrations with popular tools like GitHub, enabling users to incorporate its static code analysis capabilities into their existing workflows.
Pricing Model: Bitbucket offers a freemium pricing model with free and paid plans based on the number of users and storage requirements, making it suitable for both small startups and larger enterprises. LGTM, on the other hand, follows a subscription-based pricing model, providing various tiers for organizations to choose from based on their specific needs and usage.
Focus on Security: Bitbucket emphasizes security features such as SSH key management, IP whitelisting, and two-factor authentication to protect sensitive code repositories and ensure secure collaboration within teams. While LGTM also prioritizes security, its focus is more on code quality and vulnerability detection through static code analysis.
Support for Multiple Programming Languages: Bitbucket supports various programming languages and frameworks, offering flexibility for teams working on diverse projects. In contrast, LGTM specializes in providing advanced analysis for specific languages like C, C++, JavaScript, and Python, optimizing its capabilities for in-depth code inspection and quality assurance in those areas.

Bitbucket vs LGTM

Overview