Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Bitbucket vs Perforce: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Below are the key differences between Bitbucket and Perforce.
Integration with Other Tools: Bitbucket is known for its seamless integration with other popular development tools such as JIRA, Trello, and Slack. It provides a smooth workflow for teams using these tools, enhancing collaboration and productivity. On the other hand, Perforce may not have the same level of integration with a wide range of tools, limiting its interoperability and potentially creating obstacles in the development process.
Pricing Model: Bitbucket offers flexible pricing options, including free plans for small teams and startups, as well as affordable plans for larger enterprises. This makes it a cost-effective choice for businesses of all sizes. Perforce, on the other hand, generally follows a tiered pricing model that may be more suitable for larger organizations with higher spending power. This pricing disparity can influence the decision-making process when choosing between the two.
Branching and Version Control: Bitbucket is known for its robust branching and version control capabilities. It provides a user-friendly interface that simplifies the process of branching, merging, and managing code versions. Perforce, on the other hand, also offers these features but may require a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its more complex interface and terminology.
Scalability and Performance: Bitbucket is designed to handle large-scale projects with ease. It offers scalable infrastructure and high-performance capabilities, enabling teams to work on projects of any size without experiencing significant performance degradation. Perforce, although capable of managing large codebases, may not be as efficient in terms of scalability and performance in comparison to Bitbucket.
Security and Access Control: Bitbucket provides robust security features, including access control, encryption, and compliance with industry standards such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, and GDPR. It allows teams to control who can access repositories and set permissions accordingly. Perforce also provides security features but may not have the same level of granular control and compliance certifications as Bitbucket.
Community and Support: Bitbucket has a large and active community of users, which provides opportunities for knowledge sharing, troubleshooting, and community-driven development. It also offers comprehensive documentation and support resources. Perforce, while having an active user community, may not have the same level of community engagement and extensive support documentation as Bitbucket.
In summary, Bitbucket offers seamless integration with other tools, flexible pricing options, robust branching and version control capabilities, scalable performance, strong security features, and an active community. Perforce, although capable in these areas, may have limitations in terms of integration, pricing, user-friendliness, scalability, security granularity, and community support.
We are using a Bitbucket server, and due to migration efforts and new Atlassian community license changes, we need to move to a new self-hosted solution. The new data-center license for Atlassian, available in February, will be community provisioned (free). Along with that community license, other technologies will be coming with it (Crucible, Confluence, and Jira). Is there value in a paid-for license to get the GitHub Enterprise? Are the tools that come with it worth the cost?
I know it is about $20 per 10 seats, and we have about 300 users. Have other convertees to Microsoft's tools found it easy to do a migration? Is the toolset that much more beneficial to the free suite that one can get from Atlassian?
So far, free seems to be the winner, and the familiarization with Atlassian implementation and maintenance is understood. Going to GitHub, are there any distinct challenges to be found or any perks to be attained?
These are pretty competitive, and to recommend one over the other would require understanding your usage. Also, what other tools you use: for instance, what do you use for Issue-tracking, or for build pipelines. In your case, since you are already using Bitbucket, the question would be: do you have any current pain-points? And, on the other hand, do you already use Atlassian's JIRA, where you'd benefit from the tight integration? So, though I would not recommend one over the other just in general,. But, if Bitbucket fulfills your current use-cases, then there seems to be little motivation to move.
Hi, I need advice. In my project, we are using Bitbucket hosted on-prem, Jenkins, and Jira. Also, we have restrictions not to use any plugins for code review, code quality, code security, etc., with bitbucket. Now we want to migrate to AWS CodeCommit, which would mean that we can use, let's say, Amazon CodeGuru for code reviews and move to AWS CodeBuild and AWS CodePipeline for build automation in the future rather than using Jenkins.
Now I want advice on below.
- Is it a good idea to migrate from Bitbucket to AWS Codecommit?
- If we want to integrate Jira with AWS Codecommit, then how can we do this? If a developer makes any changes in Jira, then a build should be triggered automatically in AWS and create a Jira ticket if the build fails. So, how can we achieve this?
Hi Kavita. It would be useful to explain in a bit more detail the integration to Jira you would like to achieve. Some of the Jira plugins will work with any git repository, regardless if its github/bitbucket/gitlab.
Do you have a K8s cluster and you want to deploy some services to it? Gitlab Auto Devops is key to achieve this without breaking a sweat.
We deploy Go services to our K8S clusters with warp speed thanks to Gitlab and it's Auto Devops pipeline.
I haven't seen tooling like this in any other git cloud provider.
I first used BitBucket because it had private repo's, and it didn't disappoint me. Also with the smooth integration of Jira, the decision to use BitBucket as a full application maintenance service was as easy as 1, 2, 3.
I honestly love BitBucket, by the looks, by the UI, and the smooth integration with Tower.
Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?
If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:
- Pick the correct target branch
- Make Drafts explicit
- Name things properly
- Ask help for tools
- Remove the noise
- Fetch necessary data
- Understand Mergeability
- Pass the message
- Add screenshots
- Be found in the future
- Comment inline in your changes
Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D
What else do you review before asking for code review?
One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.
It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.
Pros of Bitbucket
- Free private repos905
- Simple setup397
- Nice ui and tools349
- Unlimited private repositories342
- Affordable git hosting240
- Integrates with many apis and services123
- Reliable uptime119
- Nice gui87
- Pull requests and code reviews85
- Very customisable58
- Mercurial repositories16
- SourceTree integration14
- JIRA integration12
- Track every commit to an issue in JIRA10
- Deployment hooks8
- Best free alternative to Github8
- Automatically share repositories with all your teammates7
- Source Code Insight7
- Compatible with Mac and Windows7
- Price6
- Login with Google5
- Create a wiki5
- Approve pull request button5
- Customizable pipelines4
- #2 Atlassian Product after JIRA4
- Unlimited Private Repos at no cost3
- Also supports Mercurial3
- Continuous Integration and Delivery3
- Mercurial Support2
- Multilingual interface2
- Teamcity2
- Open source friendly2
- Issues tracker2
- IAM2
- Academic license program2
- IAM integration2
Pros of Perforce
- Powerful3
- Great for Enterprise level use3
- Robust2
- Scalable1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Bitbucket
- Not much community activity19
- Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui17
- Quite buggy15
- Managed by enterprise Java company10
- CI tool is not free of charge8
- Complexity with rights management7
- Only 5 collaborators for private repos6
- Slow performance4
- No AWS Codepipelines integration2
- No more Mercurial repositories1
- No server side git-hook support1
Cons of Perforce
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Bitbucket?
What is Perforce?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Perforce?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Perforce?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+4
+32+34