Bitrise vs fastlane

Overview

fastlane

Stacks716

Followers437

Votes74

GitHub Stars40.6K

Forks6.0K

Bitrise

Stacks342

Followers373

Votes74

Bitrise vs fastlane: What are the differences?

Introduction

The following Markdown code provides a comparison of key differences between Bitrise and Fastlane, two popular tools used in mobile app development and automation.

Installation and Setup: Bitrise is a cloud-based continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) platform, while Fastlane is a command-line tool. Bitrise requires the user to sign up and configure a workflow using their web interface, while Fastlane can be installed directly through the command line using Ruby. Fastlane's setup process involves managing dependencies and provisioning profiles manually, while Bitrise handles these tasks automatically.
Workflow Configuration: Bitrise offers a graphical interface for configuring and customizing workflows, making it user-friendly for developers of all expertise levels. In contrast, Fastlane relies on a configuration file called "Fastfile," where developers need to define various actions and lanes manually using Ruby code. This requires a certain level of coding knowledge and familiarity with the Fastlane syntax.
Supported Platforms: Bitrise supports a wide range of platforms, including iOS, Android, Flutter, React Native, and more, making it flexible for multi-platform development. Fastlane primarily focuses on iOS and Android platforms and provides specific actions and integrations for these platforms, but support for other frameworks may not be as extensive.
Extensibility and Customization: Bitrise offers a marketplace with a wide range of integrations and step templates, allowing developers to easily extend and customize their workflows with minimal effort. Fastlane also provides community-contributed plugins and actions, giving developers the flexibility to modify and adapt their automation tasks. However, compared to Bitrise, Fastlane may require more manual effort to find and integrate the desired functionality.
User Interface: Bitrise provides a visually appealing and intuitive user interface, making it easier to navigate, configure, and monitor build processes. Fastlane, being a command-line tool, lacks the graphical interface, requiring developers to manage the automation process through command line inputs and scripts. This command-line approach may be preferable for experienced developers who prefer the terminal environment.
Pricing Model: Bitrise uses a pricing model based on different tiers, offering both free and paid plans. The free plan allows a limited number of build minutes and concurrent builds, while the paid plans provide additional benefits, such as increased build capacity and priority support. Fastlane, on the other hand, is an open-source tool and does not involve any direct cost. However, there may be associated costs with cloud resources or services if developers choose to utilize them in conjunction with Fastlane.

In Summary, Bitrise and Fastlane differ in terms of installation and setup process, workflow configuration, supported platforms, extensibility, user interface, and pricing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on fastlane, Bitrise

Amal

Mar 24, 2022

Needs adviceon

fastlane

CodePush

Bitrise

Dear Community!

I am researching for Mobile Application Management platform for managing android and ios release management in Fintech space. I see following options are good:

Please suggest if you have better option.

230k views230k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

fastlane	Bitrise
fastlane lets you define and run your deployment pipelines for different environments. It helps you unify your app’s release process and automate the whole process. fastlane connects all fastlane tools and third party tools, like CocoaPods.	It is a Continous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) Platform as a Service (PaaS) with a main focus on mobile app development (iOS, Android). You can automate the testing and deployment of your apps with just a few clicks. When you trigger a build a Virtual Machine is assigned to host your build and your defined Workflow (series of Steps scripts) will be executed, step by step.
Connect all build tools together;Define multiple lanes for different needs;Jenkins Integration;Extend by adding your own build steps;Deploy from any computer;Release new app updates with the push of a button	Continuous Delivery;Hosted Environment;Customizable Workflows;Code Security;Open Source;Support by Devs
Statistics
GitHub Stars 40.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 6.0K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 716	Stacks 342
Followers 437	Followers 373
Votes 74	Votes 74
Pros & Cons
Pros 20 Easy to use 13 Itunes connect deployment 13 Open Source 11 Incredible flexability 9 Third party integrations	Pros 18 Easy setup 9 Bitbucket Integration 8 Advanced Workflow configuration 7 Github Integration 7 Slack integration
Integrations
Testmunk GitHub Bitbucket TestFlight HockeyApp HipChat Crashlytics Travis CI Jenkins Slack	Android SDK Apache Cordova TestFlight TestFairy Gradle Amazon S3 Xamarin Slack Parse Twilio

What are some alternatives to fastlane, Bitrise?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Bitrise vs fastlane: What are the differences?

Introduction

The following Markdown code provides a comparison of key differences between Bitrise and Fastlane, two popular tools used in mobile app development and automation.

Installation and Setup: Bitrise is a cloud-based continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) platform, while Fastlane is a command-line tool. Bitrise requires the user to sign up and configure a workflow using their web interface, while Fastlane can be installed directly through the command line using Ruby. Fastlane's setup process involves managing dependencies and provisioning profiles manually, while Bitrise handles these tasks automatically.
Workflow Configuration: Bitrise offers a graphical interface for configuring and customizing workflows, making it user-friendly for developers of all expertise levels. In contrast, Fastlane relies on a configuration file called "Fastfile," where developers need to define various actions and lanes manually using Ruby code. This requires a certain level of coding knowledge and familiarity with the Fastlane syntax.
Supported Platforms: Bitrise supports a wide range of platforms, including iOS, Android, Flutter, React Native, and more, making it flexible for multi-platform development. Fastlane primarily focuses on iOS and Android platforms and provides specific actions and integrations for these platforms, but support for other frameworks may not be as extensive.
Extensibility and Customization: Bitrise offers a marketplace with a wide range of integrations and step templates, allowing developers to easily extend and customize their workflows with minimal effort. Fastlane also provides community-contributed plugins and actions, giving developers the flexibility to modify and adapt their automation tasks. However, compared to Bitrise, Fastlane may require more manual effort to find and integrate the desired functionality.
User Interface: Bitrise provides a visually appealing and intuitive user interface, making it easier to navigate, configure, and monitor build processes. Fastlane, being a command-line tool, lacks the graphical interface, requiring developers to manage the automation process through command line inputs and scripts. This command-line approach may be preferable for experienced developers who prefer the terminal environment.
Pricing Model: Bitrise uses a pricing model based on different tiers, offering both free and paid plans. The free plan allows a limited number of build minutes and concurrent builds, while the paid plans provide additional benefits, such as increased build capacity and priority support. Fastlane, on the other hand, is an open-source tool and does not involve any direct cost. However, there may be associated costs with cloud resources or services if developers choose to utilize them in conjunction with Fastlane.

In Summary, Bitrise and Fastlane differ in terms of installation and setup process, workflow configuration, supported platforms, extensibility, user interface, and pricing models.