Black Duck vs JaCoCo: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will highlight the key differences between Black Duck and JaCoCo.

1. Integration with Development Process: Black Duck is primarily used for managing open-source software compliance and security risks throughout the software development lifecycle. On the other hand, JaCoCo is a tool used for measuring code coverage in Java applications to improve quality and test effectiveness.

2. Functionality: Black Duck focuses on identifying potential security vulnerabilities, licensing risks, and open-source component information. In contrast, JaCoCo focuses solely on code coverage metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of test suites.

3. Usage: Organizations utilize Black Duck to ensure compliance with licensing requirements, improve application security, and mitigate risks associated with open-source components. JaCoCo, on the other hand, is mainly used by developers and testing teams to measure the extent of code covered by test cases.

4. Reporting: Black Duck generates detailed reports on open-source component vulnerabilities, license compliance, and security risks. JaCoCo, on the other hand, produces reports on code coverage metrics such as line coverage, branch coverage, and cyclomatic complexity.

5. Integration with CI/CD Pipelines: While Black Duck can be integrated into CI/CD pipelines to automate open-source component scanning and compliance checks, JaCoCo is often integrated to monitor code coverage trends and identify areas that require additional testing focus.

6. Supported Languages: Black Duck supports multiple programming languages including Java, Python, JavaScript, and others. JaCoCo, on the other hand, is specifically designed for Java applications and does not provide support for other languages.

In Summary, the key differences between Black Duck and JaCoCo lie in their primary functions, integration with the development process, report generation, usage, and supported languages.