Black Duck vs SonarLint

Overview

Black Duck

Stacks47

Followers122

Votes0

SonarLint

Stacks175

Followers352

Votes16

Black Duck vs SonarLint: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Black Duck and SonarLint, there are key differences that distinguish the two software tools used in software development and security.

Integration: Black Duck is integrated with build systems, IDEs, and repositories to provide real-time alerts on open-source vulnerabilities, while SonarLint is integrated with IDEs to provide instant feedback on code quality issues during development.
Focus: Black Duck mainly focuses on identifying and managing open-source risks and vulnerabilities within a software project, while SonarLint primarily focuses on improving code quality and maintainability by providing code analysis and bug detection.
License Compliance: Black Duck is particularly useful for ensuring license compliance by identifying open-source components and their licenses within a project, while SonarLint does not have this specific feature and instead focuses on improving the overall code quality.
Automated Scanning: Black Duck includes automated scans for open-source vulnerabilities and compliance issues, whereas SonarLint offers automated code analysis and bug detection during the development process.
Customizability: Black Duck offers more customization options for managing and mitigating open-source risks, while SonarLint is more straightforward in its approach to providing code quality feedback without extensive customization features.
Developer Focus: SonarLint is designed to be developer-centric, providing immediate feedback and suggestions for improving code quality as developers write code, while Black Duck caters more to security and compliance teams looking to manage open-source risks in a project.

In Summary, Black Duck and SonarLint differ in terms of integration, focus, license compliance, automated scanning, customizability, and developer focus in software development and security.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Black Duck	SonarLint
It is a solution that helps development teams manage risks that come with the use of open source. It gives you complete visibility into open source management, combining sophisticated, multi-factor open source detection capabilities with the Black Duck KnowledgeBase.	It is an IDE extension that helps you detect and fix quality issues as you write code. Like a spell checker, it squiggles flaws so that they can be fixed before committing code.
License management; PDF protection; Trial license; Binary separation; Asset tracking; Audit management; Open source security; Open source compliance.	Bug detection;Instant feedback;Know what to do;Learn from your mistakes;Uncover old issues
Statistics
Stacks 47	Stacks 175
Followers 122	Followers 352
Votes 0	Votes 16
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 13 IDE Integration 3 Free Cons 3 Not Very User Friendly 3 Non contextual warnings
Integrations
Apache Ant Travis CI Gradle Bitbucket Apache Maven Bamboo Appveyor	Visual Studio Visual Studio Code Eclipse IntelliJ IDEA

What are some alternatives to Black Duck, SonarLint?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman vs Swagger UI

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Black Duck vs SonarLint: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Black Duck and SonarLint, there are key differences that distinguish the two software tools used in software development and security.

Integration: Black Duck is integrated with build systems, IDEs, and repositories to provide real-time alerts on open-source vulnerabilities, while SonarLint is integrated with IDEs to provide instant feedback on code quality issues during development.
Focus: Black Duck mainly focuses on identifying and managing open-source risks and vulnerabilities within a software project, while SonarLint primarily focuses on improving code quality and maintainability by providing code analysis and bug detection.
License Compliance: Black Duck is particularly useful for ensuring license compliance by identifying open-source components and their licenses within a project, while SonarLint does not have this specific feature and instead focuses on improving the overall code quality.
Automated Scanning: Black Duck includes automated scans for open-source vulnerabilities and compliance issues, whereas SonarLint offers automated code analysis and bug detection during the development process.
Customizability: Black Duck offers more customization options for managing and mitigating open-source risks, while SonarLint is more straightforward in its approach to providing code quality feedback without extensive customization features.
Developer Focus: SonarLint is designed to be developer-centric, providing immediate feedback and suggestions for improving code quality as developers write code, while Black Duck caters more to security and compliance teams looking to manage open-source risks in a project.

In Summary, Black Duck and SonarLint differ in terms of integration, focus, license compliance, automated scanning, customizability, and developer focus in software development and security.