Overview

BrowserStack

Stacks2.7K

Followers2.0K

Votes533

Cypress

Stacks2.4K

Followers2.0K

Votes115

GitHub Stars49.4K

Forks3.4K

BrowserStack vs Cypress: What are the differences?

Key differences between BrowserStack and Cypress

BrowserStack and Cypress are both popular testing tools for web applications, but they have some key differences. Here are six specific differences between them:

Installation and setup: BrowserStack requires setting up a separate account and integrating with your testing framework, while Cypress can be installed as an npm package with minimal setup.
Architecture: BrowserStack executes tests in parallel on real devices or emulators, simulating real user behavior. On the other hand, Cypress runs tests directly in the browser and can access the DOM and underlying network.
Supported browsers: BrowserStack provides a wide range of browser and device configurations for testing, including different versions and platforms. Cypress, on the other hand, only supports Chromium-based browsers.
Testing capabilities: BrowserStack supports cross-browser and cross-platform testing, allowing you to test on different browsers, devices, and operating systems. Cypress focuses more on end-to-end testing and provides features like time-travel debugging and automatic waiting.
Pricing and licensing: BrowserStack offers different pricing plans based on usage and requires a paid license for its full range of features. Cypress, on the other hand, is open-source and free to use, making it more cost-effective for smaller projects or individual developers.
Community and support: BrowserStack has a larger user community and offers dedicated support through various channels. Cypress also has a growing community but may not have the same level of support as BrowserStack.

In summary, BrowserStack offers a broader range of testing capabilities and device configurations, but requires additional setup and has a cost associated with it. Cypress, on the other hand, is easier to set up, focused on end-to-end testing, and is free to use.

🔥 Trending in Testing Frameworks on StackShare

Skyvern Testing Frameworks

Browser automation using LLMs and computer vision

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

5

Advice on BrowserStack, Cypress

Rinchin

Jul 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Selenium

Sauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

217k views217k

Comments

Dane

Feb 7, 2020

Needs adviceon

Cypress

Jest

As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.

835k views835k

Comments

Yildiz

testmanager/automation tester at medicalservice

May 12, 2020

Needs adviceon

AngularJS

TypeScript

Cypress

In the company I will be building test automation framework and my new company develops apps mainly using AngularJS/TypeScript. I was planning to build Protractor-Jasmine framework but a friend of mine told me about Cypress and heard that its users are very satisfied with it. I am trying to understand the capabilities of Cypress and as the final goal to differentiate these two tools. Can anyone advice me on this in a nutshell pls...

277k views277k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

BrowserStack	Cypress
BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.	Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
Get instant access to 20,000+ real mobile devices and browsers, which include real iOS and Android devices, Chrome, IE, Firefox, Safari; Test websites hosted on internal dev and staging environments with zero setup or configuration; Run hundreds of tests concurrently to speed up the execution time of your test suite by more than 10x	Time Travel; Debuggability; Automatic Waiting; Spies, Stubs, and Clocks; Network Traffic Control; Consistent Results; Screenshots and Videos
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 49.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 3.4K
Stacks 2.7K	Stacks 2.4K
Followers 2.0K	Followers 2.0K
Votes 533	Votes 115
Pros & Cons
Pros 135 Multiple browsers 76 Ease of use 65 Real browsers 44 Ability to use it locally 27 Good price Cons 2 Very limited choice of minor versions	Pros 29 Open source 22 Great documentation 20 Simple usage 18 Fast 10 Cross Browser testing Cons 21 Cypress is weak at cross-browser testing 14 Switch tabs : Cypress can'nt support 12 No iFrame support 9 No page object support 9 No multiple domain support
Integrations
QMetry Jira WordPress Shopify Zapier Drone.io Jenkins Slack GitLab Gradle	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to BrowserStack, Cypress?

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.