BrowserStack vs TestFlight

Overview

TestFlight

Stacks1.1K

Followers705

Votes163

BrowserStack

Stacks2.7K

Followers2.0K

Votes533

BrowserStack vs TestFlight: What are the differences?

Introduction

This article discusses the key differences between BrowserStack and TestFlight, two popular tools used in software testing and development.

Deployment Process: One of the main differences between BrowserStack and TestFlight is their deployment process. BrowserStack allows instant deployment of apps or websites on various devices and browsers, making it easier for developers to test across different platforms. On the other hand, TestFlight requires a more manual deployment process, requiring developers to upload the app to iTunes Connect and then distributing it to testers, which can be more time-consuming.
Compatibility: Another key difference between BrowserStack and TestFlight is their compatibility. BrowserStack supports a wide range of devices, browsers, and operating systems, allowing developers to test their apps or websites on almost any device. In contrast, TestFlight is restricted to iOS devices only, limiting its compatibility for testing purposes. This makes BrowserStack a more versatile tool for cross-platform testing.
Collaboration Features: BrowserStack and TestFlight also differ in their collaboration features. With TestFlight, developers can invite external testers to try out their apps and provide feedback, making it easier to gather user insights. BrowserStack, on the other hand, offers advanced collaboration features such as real-time testing and sharing sessions, allowing multiple team members to work together simultaneously and troubleshoot issues collectively.
Testing Capabilities: When it comes to testing capabilities, BrowserStack provides comprehensive testing options. It supports not only manual testing but also automated testing, allowing developers to run automated test scripts across multiple devices and browsers. TestFlight, on the other hand, focuses more on beta testing and user feedback, lacking advanced automated testing capabilities like BrowserStack.
User Interface: The user interface of BrowserStack and TestFlight also differs significantly. BrowserStack offers a clean and intuitive interface with easy navigation, making it simple for users to find the necessary tools and features. TestFlight, on the other hand, has a more minimalistic user interface that focuses on essential functionalities, providing a simpler and less overwhelming experience for users.
Pricing: Lastly, pricing is another aspect where BrowserStack and TestFlight differ. BrowserStack offers different pricing plans based on the needs of individuals, startups, and enterprises. They provide a free trial and flexible payment options. TestFlight, on the other hand, is entirely free for developers who have enrolled in the Apple Developer Program. This makes TestFlight a more cost-effective option for iOS developers, especially for smaller teams or individuals.

In Summary, BrowserStack and TestFlight differ in their deployment process, compatibility, collaboration features, testing capabilities, user interface, and pricing. BrowserStack offers instant deployment, broader compatibility, advanced collaboration features, comprehensive testing capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexible pricing. On the other hand, TestFlight requires a more manual deployment process, is limited to iOS devices, focuses on beta testing and user feedback, has a simpler user interface, and is entirely free for iOS developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on TestFlight, BrowserStack

Rinchin

Jul 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Selenium

Sauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

217k views217k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

TestFlight	BrowserStack
With TestFlight, developers simply upload a build, and the testers can install it directly from their device, over the air.	BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.
Sessions- Discover how testers are using your application. Watch as they progress and take unexpected turns.;Crash Reports- Reported in realtime, with environment snapshots and full session activity.;In-App Questions- The most effective way to get tester feedback. Get the answers you need by asking questions the moment a checkpoint is passed.;Checkpoints- Place checkpoints throughout your app to see how far testers are getting, confirm which areas are popular and reveal ones that need more testing.;Remote Logging- TFLogs are attached to your session and crash reports.;In-App Updates- Prompt testers to install the latest version of your app. This is the easiest way for your testers to take advantage of installing on the fly.	Get instant access to 20,000+ real mobile devices and browsers, which include real iOS and Android devices, Chrome, IE, Firefox, Safari; Test websites hosted on internal dev and staging environments with zero setup or configuration; Run hundreds of tests concurrently to speed up the execution time of your test suite by more than 10x
Statistics
Stacks 1.1K	Stacks 2.7K
Followers 705	Followers 2.0K
Votes 163	Votes 533
Pros & Cons
Pros 62 Must have for ios development 49 Beta testing 20 Easy setup 10 Easy way to push out updates for internal testers 7 In-App Updates	Pros 135 Multiple browsers 76 Ease of use 65 Real browsers 44 Ability to use it locally 27 Good price Cons 2 Very limited choice of minor versions
Integrations
Trigger.io	Cypress QMetry Jira WordPress Shopify Zapier Drone.io Jenkins Slack GitLab

What are some alternatives to TestFlight, BrowserStack?

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

HockeyApp

HockeyApp is the best way to collect live crash reports, get feedback from your users, distribute your betas, and analyze your test coverage.

Testrail

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

TestFairy

When testing apps in the crowd, you never know what exactly was done, and what went wrong on the client side. TestFairy shows you a video of the exact test that was done, including CPU, memory, GPS, network and a lot more.

Related Comparisons

BrowserStack vs TestFlight: What are the differences?

Introduction

This article discusses the key differences between BrowserStack and TestFlight, two popular tools used in software testing and development.

Deployment Process: One of the main differences between BrowserStack and TestFlight is their deployment process. BrowserStack allows instant deployment of apps or websites on various devices and browsers, making it easier for developers to test across different platforms. On the other hand, TestFlight requires a more manual deployment process, requiring developers to upload the app to iTunes Connect and then distributing it to testers, which can be more time-consuming.
Compatibility: Another key difference between BrowserStack and TestFlight is their compatibility. BrowserStack supports a wide range of devices, browsers, and operating systems, allowing developers to test their apps or websites on almost any device. In contrast, TestFlight is restricted to iOS devices only, limiting its compatibility for testing purposes. This makes BrowserStack a more versatile tool for cross-platform testing.
Collaboration Features: BrowserStack and TestFlight also differ in their collaboration features. With TestFlight, developers can invite external testers to try out their apps and provide feedback, making it easier to gather user insights. BrowserStack, on the other hand, offers advanced collaboration features such as real-time testing and sharing sessions, allowing multiple team members to work together simultaneously and troubleshoot issues collectively.
Testing Capabilities: When it comes to testing capabilities, BrowserStack provides comprehensive testing options. It supports not only manual testing but also automated testing, allowing developers to run automated test scripts across multiple devices and browsers. TestFlight, on the other hand, focuses more on beta testing and user feedback, lacking advanced automated testing capabilities like BrowserStack.
User Interface: The user interface of BrowserStack and TestFlight also differs significantly. BrowserStack offers a clean and intuitive interface with easy navigation, making it simple for users to find the necessary tools and features. TestFlight, on the other hand, has a more minimalistic user interface that focuses on essential functionalities, providing a simpler and less overwhelming experience for users.
Pricing: Lastly, pricing is another aspect where BrowserStack and TestFlight differ. BrowserStack offers different pricing plans based on the needs of individuals, startups, and enterprises. They provide a free trial and flexible payment options. TestFlight, on the other hand, is entirely free for developers who have enrolled in the Apple Developer Program. This makes TestFlight a more cost-effective option for iOS developers, especially for smaller teams or individuals.

BrowserStack vs TestFlight

Overview