BrowserStack vs TestingBot: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this markdown code, we will provide the key differences between BrowserStack and TestingBot, two popular testing platforms.
-
Scalability: BrowserStack provides an extensive range of devices and browsers, with over 2000 real devices and browsers available for testing. On the other hand, TestingBot offers a slightly smaller range of devices and browsers in their device lab, with around 1000 real devices and browsers available. Therefore, if scalability and a wide range of device coverage are crucial for your testing needs, BrowserStack may be the preferred choice.
-
Pricing: When it comes to pricing, BrowserStack offers a wide range of plans catering to different needs, starting from their affordable 'Live' plan to their more advanced 'Automate' and 'Enterprise' plans. TestingBot also offers various pricing plans, but their pricing is generally considered to be slightly higher compared to BrowserStack. Therefore, if budget is a significant consideration, BrowserStack may be a more cost-effective option.
-
Parallel Testing: BrowserStack allows running tests in parallel across different devices and browsers, enabling faster testing cycles and quicker feedback. TestingBot also supports parallel testing, but the number of parallel sessions is slightly limited compared to BrowserStack. If you prioritize parallel testing for quicker and efficient test execution, BrowserStack may have the edge in this aspect.
-
Geolocation Testing: BrowserStack offers a unique feature called 'Geo Location Testing' which allows users to test their applications from different geo locations worldwide. TestingBot currently does not offer this feature, making BrowserStack a better choice for testing scenarios that require evaluating the performance and functionality from different geographical locations.
-
Infrastructure: BrowserStack has a robust and highly available infrastructure spread across various geographical regions. This ensures reliable and seamless performance during testing. TestingBot also provides a reliable infrastructure, but it may not be as extensive as BrowserStack's infrastructure in terms of coverage and availability. Therefore, if infrastructure reliability is a top priority, BrowserStack may be the preferred option.
-
Integrations: Both BrowserStack and TestingBot offer integrations with popular tools like Jira, Jenkins, and CI/CD platforms. However, BrowserStack provides a wider range of integrations and has a more extensive ecosystem to seamlessly fit into your existing testing workflows. Therefore, if integrations with specific tools are crucial for your testing process, BrowserStack may offer more flexibility and compatibility.
In summary, BrowserStack offers greater scalability, more affordable pricing options, extensive parallel testing capabilities, geolocation testing, a robust infrastructure, and a wider range of integrations compared to TestingBot. Consequently, BrowserStack may be the preferred choice for organizations that prioritize these factors in their testing strategies.
