StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. BrowserStack vs Visual Studio App Center

BrowserStack vs Visual Studio App Center

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.0K
Votes533
Visual Studio App Center
Visual Studio App Center
Stacks113
Followers232
Votes4

BrowserStack vs Visual Studio App Center: What are the differences?

Introduction

BrowserStack and Visual Studio App Center are both popular tools used in website and mobile app development. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two platforms that set them apart. In this comparison, we will highlight the top six differences between BrowserStack and Visual Studio App Center.

  1. Test Execution Environment: BrowserStack provides a vast range of real devices and browsers for testing websites and web applications across different platforms. On the other hand, Visual Studio App Center offers a cloud-based emulator and simulator, allowing developers to test their mobile apps on virtual devices.

  2. Testing Capabilities: BrowserStack supports both automated and manual testing, enabling developers to perform tests at different stages of the software development lifecycle. Visual Studio App Center, on the other hand, primarily focuses on providing capabilities for automated testing, making it more suitable for projects that heavily rely on automation.

  3. Integrations and Plugins: BrowserStack offers integration with various development and testing tools, such as Jira, Jenkins, and Selenium, allowing developers to seamlessly incorporate it into their existing workflows. Visual Studio App Center, on the other hand, is more integrated with the Microsoft ecosystem, making it a preferred choice for teams using Microsoft's development stack.

  4. Analytics and Crash Reporting: Visual Studio App Center goes beyond testing by providing detailed analytics and crash reporting for mobile apps. It offers insights into app usage, user engagement, and performance, helping developers identify and fix issues more effectively. BrowserStack, on the other hand, does not offer extensive built-in analytics and crash reporting features.

  5. Development Platform Support: BrowserStack supports testing across a wide range of desktop browsers, mobile browsers, and real devices, making it suitable for both web and mobile app development. Visual Studio App Center, on the other hand, is primarily focused on mobile app development, providing robust support for iOS and Android platforms.

  6. Pricing and Licensing: BrowserStack offers flexible pricing options, allowing developers to choose from different plans based on their testing needs. Visual Studio App Center, on the other hand, is typically bundled with Microsoft's Visual Studio subscription, which can be a cost-effective choice for teams already using Visual Studio.

In summary, BrowserStack provides a comprehensive testing environment with support for a wide range of devices and browsers, making it suitable for both web and mobile app testing. On the other hand, Visual Studio App Center offers a more focused approach, primarily targeting automated testing and providing strong integration with Microsoft's development tools. The choice between the two platforms depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Visual Studio App Center
Visual Studio App Center

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Automate the lifecycle of your iOS, Android, Windows, and macOS apps. Connect your repo and within minutes build in the cloud, test on thousands of real devices, distribute to beta testers and app stores, and monitor real-world usage with crash and analytics data. All in one place.

Get instant access to 20,000+ real mobile devices and browsers, which include real iOS and Android devices, Chrome, IE, Firefox, Safari; Test websites hosted on internal dev and staging environments with zero setup or configuration; Run hundreds of tests concurrently to speed up the execution time of your test suite by more than 10x
Build; Test; Distribute; Crashes; Diagnostics; Analytics; Push; CD/CI;
Statistics
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
113
Followers
2.0K
Followers
232
Votes
533
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 135
    Multiple browsers
  • 76
    Ease of use
  • 65
    Real browsers
  • 44
    Ability to use it locally
  • 27
    Good price
Cons
  • 2
    Very limited choice of minor versions
Pros
  • 1
    For Mobile apps diagnostics and tracking
  • 1
    Slack integration
  • 1
    Show error issues for mobile devices
  • 1
    Bug tracking integration
Integrations
Cypress
Cypress
QMetry
QMetry
Jira
Jira
WordPress
WordPress
Shopify
Shopify
Zapier
Zapier
Drone.io
Drone.io
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
GitLab
GitLab
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Slack
Slack

What are some alternatives to BrowserStack, Visual Studio App Center?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot