Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
BrowserStack vs Xcode: What are the differences?
Key differences between BrowserStack and Xcode
Introduction
BrowserStack and Xcode are both software tools used for testing and developing applications, but they have distinct differences. Here are the key differences between BrowserStack and Xcode explained in detail.
BrowserStack: BrowserStack is a cloud-based testing platform that allows developers to test their applications on a wide range of browsers and devices. It provides real-time testing capabilities and supports cross-browser and cross-platform testing. With BrowserStack, developers can test their applications on various operating systems, browsers, and mobile devices without the need for physical devices.
Xcode: Xcode is an integrated development environment (IDE) provided by Apple for developing applications for iOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS platforms. It is specifically designed for macOS and provides a comprehensive set of tools and resources for building, debugging, and testing iOS and macOS applications. Xcode supports various app development features, including code editing, debugging, performance analysis, and interface design.
Browser Compatibility: BrowserStack offers extensive browser compatibility, allowing developers to test their applications on multiple browsers such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Internet Explorer, and more. On the other hand, Xcode primarily focuses on iOS and macOS development, providing testing capabilities specifically for Safari browser on these platforms.
Device Compatibility: BrowserStack provides a wide range of device options for testing applications, including smartphones, tablets, and even IoT devices. It covers major operating systems like iOS, Android, Windows, and macOS, allowing developers to thoroughly test their applications on different devices and screen sizes. As for Xcode, it is limited to testing on Apple devices only, including iPhones, iPads, iPods, and Macs.
Platform Support: BrowserStack supports cross-platform testing, allowing developers to test their applications on different operating systems and browsers. It provides a seamless testing experience across multiple platforms, ensuring consistent behavior of applications on different devices. On the other hand, Xcode is specifically designed for Apple's platforms and focuses on providing the best development and testing experience exclusively for iOS and macOS.
Development Tools Integration: Xcode is deeply integrated with various Apple development tools and technologies, including Interface Builder, Core Data, Auto Layout, and more. It offers extensive support for iOS frameworks and libraries, making it easier for developers to leverage Apple's specific features and capabilities. BrowserStack, on the other hand, is platform-agnostic and does not offer the same level of integration with specific development tools and technologies.
Cost and Availability: BrowserStack is a commercial service that requires a subscription to access its features and capabilities. It offers different pricing plans based on the needs of developers and organizations, providing flexible options for testing applications. On the contrary, Xcode is a free IDE provided by Apple for developers, making it more accessible and cost-effective for iOS and macOS app development.
In summary, BrowserStack is a cloud-based testing platform that supports cross-browser and cross-platform testing, while Xcode is a development environment specifically designed for iOS and macOS app development. BrowserStack offers extensive browser and device compatibility, cross-platform support, and integration flexibility, while Xcode provides deep integration with Apple development tools and technologies, limited device and browser compatibility, and free access.
I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.
I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools
A SaaS offering like Sauce Labs (or BrowserStack or LambdaTest, etc) will provide a remote Selenium/Appium Grid including the ability to run test automation in parallel (up to the amount based your subscription level) an a wide array of browsers and mobile devices.
These tools can be expensive, but if you can afford them, the expertise and effort of maintaining the grid, browser updates, etc. is worth it.
AWS Device Farm can be significantly cheaper, but is much more work to setup and run. It will not give you as many devices, or the reporting and screen/video capture you get with the the services. And there is no support for AWS Device Farm, and very poor documentation. I have used it, but do not recommend it. Running your own grid and physical device lab is better, but I'd stick with a service like Sauce Labs or Perfecto which will save you time and give you better services despite the higher price tag.
Stability - Just works. Availability - More than 15 datacenters. Enterprise features like SSO, local testing and SOC2/GDPR compliant.
BitBar's Dedicated Devices would be a great option for you. It allows you to dedicate (reserve) devices for your use only which also having access to all of the devices in the shared cloud. BitBar has the features and integrations that you are looking for as well.
Pros of BrowserStack
- Multiple browsers134
- Ease of use75
- Real browsers63
- Ability to use it locally43
- Good price26
- Great web interface20
- IE support18
- Official mobile emulators16
- Instant access14
- Cloud-based access14
- Real mobile devices11
- Selenium compatible7
- Screenshots7
- Multiple Desktop OS7
- Can be used for Testing and E2E6
- Pre-installed developer tools5
- Video of test runs4
- Webdriver compatible3
- Many browsers3
- Supports Manual, Functional and Visual Diff Testing3
- Favourites3
- Cypress Compatible2
- Test automation dashboard2
- Unify and track test cases2
- Free for Open Source2
- Test Management2
- Cross-browser testing2
- Bi-directional Jira Sync2
- Speed is fast1
- Real devices1
- Web accessibility0
- Test WCAG Compliance0
- Visual testing and review0
Pros of Xcode
- IOS Development130
- Personal assistant on steroids33
- Easy setup29
- Excellent integration with Clang17
- Beautiful3
- Built-in everything1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of BrowserStack
- Very limited choice of minor versions2
Cons of Xcode
- Massively bloated and complicated for smaller projects6
- Horrible auto completiting and text editing3
- Slow startup1
- Very slow emulator1