Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Buck vs Visual Studio Code: What are the differences?
Key Differences Between Buck and Visual Studio Code
1. Build System vs. Code Editor: Buck is primarily a build system created by Facebook, while Visual Studio Code is a code editor developed by Microsoft. Buck is designed to automate the build process of large-scale applications, ensuring efficient and consistent builds, while Visual Studio Code provides a comprehensive code editing environment with features like syntax highlighting, debugging, and git integration.
2. Language Support: Buck is language-agnostic and can be used with multiple programming languages, including Java, C++, and Python. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, provides extensive language support with a wide range of extensions and tools specifically tailored for various programming languages, such as JavaScript, Python, and Ruby.
3. Targeted Use Case: Buck is designed to handle complex build requirements and is commonly used for large-scale projects with complex dependencies and codebases. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, is suitable for a wide range of use cases, from small personal projects to large enterprise applications, providing a flexible and customizable development environment.
4. Integration with External Tools and Services: Buck has built-in support for integrating with various external tools and services, such as continuous integration systems, dependency management tools, and code quality analysis tools. Visual Studio Code offers a rich ecosystem of extensions that allow integration with a wide range of tools and services, including linters, test frameworks, version control systems, and cloud platforms.
5. Project Configuration: Buck uses a declarative build configuration file, typically written in a JSON-like format, to define build targets, dependencies, and build rules. Visual Studio Code uses a combination of project-specific configuration files (such as settings.json) and user-specific settings to customize the editor's behavior, including editor preferences, extensions, and keybindings.
6. Collaboration and Code Sharing: Since Buck is primarily focused on building and managing code, it doesn't provide extensive collaboration features. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, offers built-in collaboration features like Live Share, which allows multiple developers to simultaneously work on the same codebase, with real-time editing, debugging, and audio chat capabilities.
In summary, Buck is a specialized build system aimed at large-scale projects, while Visual Studio Code is a versatile code editor with an extensive set of features and language support for various programming languages. While Buck focuses on automating the build process, Visual Studio Code provides a customizable coding environment with collaboration capabilities.
Visual Studio Code became famous over the past 3+ years I believe. The clean UI, easy to use UX and the plethora of integrations made it a very easy decision for us. Our gripe with Sublime was probably only the UX side. VSCode has not failed us till now, and still is able to support our development env without any significant effort.
Goland being paid, as well as built only for Go seemed like a significant limitation to not consider it.
I decided to choose VSCode over Sublime text for my Systems Programming class in C. What I love about VSCode is its awesome ability to add extensions. Intellisense is a beautiful debugger, and Remote SSH allows me to login and make real-time changes in VSCode to files on my university server. This is an awesome alternative to going back and forth on pushing/pulling code and logging into servers in the terminal. Great choice for anyone interested in C programming!
Pros of Buck
- Fast4
- Java1
- 1
- Runs on OSX1
- Windows Support1
Pros of Visual Studio Code
- Powerful multilanguage IDE340
- Fast308
- Front-end develop out of the box193
- Support TypeScript IntelliSense158
- Very basic but free142
- Git integration126
- Intellisense106
- Faster than Atom78
- Better ui, easy plugins, and nice git integration53
- Great Refactoring Tools45
- Good Plugins44
- Terminal42
- Superb markdown support38
- Open Source36
- Extensions35
- Awesome UI26
- Large & up-to-date extension community26
- Powerful and fast24
- Portable22
- Best code editor18
- Best editor18
- Easy to get started with17
- Lots of extensions15
- Good for begginers15
- Crossplatform15
- Built on Electron15
- Extensions for everything14
- Open, cross-platform, fast, monthly updates14
- All Languages Support14
- Easy to use and learn13
- "fast, stable & easy to use"12
- Extensible12
- Ui design is great11
- Totally customizable11
- Git out of the box11
- Useful for begginer11
- Faster edit for slow computer11
- SSH support10
- Great community10
- Fast Startup10
- Works With Almost EveryThing You Need9
- Great language support9
- Powerful Debugger9
- It has terminal and there are lots of shortcuts in it9
- Can compile and run .py files8
- Python extension is fast8
- Features rich7
- Great document formater7
- He is not Michael6
- Extension Echosystem6
- She is not Rachel6
- Awesome multi cursor support6
- VSCode.pro Course makes it easy to learn5
- Language server client5
- SFTP Workspace5
- Very proffesional5
- Easy azure5
- Has better support and more extentions for debugging4
- Supports lots of operating systems4
- Excellent as git difftool and mergetool4
- Virtualenv integration4
- Better autocompletes than Atom3
- Has more than enough languages for any developer3
- 'batteries included'3
- More tools to integrate with vs3
- Emmet preinstalled3
- VS Code Server: Browser version of VS Code2
- CMake support with autocomplete2
- Microsoft2
- Customizable2
- Light2
- Big extension marketplace2
- Fast and ruby is built right in2
- File:///C:/Users/ydemi/Downloads/yuksel_demirkaya_webpa1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Buck
- Lack of Documentation2
- Learning Curve1
Cons of Visual Studio Code
- Slow startup46
- Resource hog at times29
- Poor refactoring20
- Poor UI Designer13
- Weak Ui design tools11
- Poor autocomplete10
- Super Slow8
- Huge cpu usage with few installed extension8
- Microsoft sends telemetry data8
- Poor in PHP7
- It's MicroSoft6
- Poor in Python3
- No Built in Browser Preview3
- No color Intergrator3
- Very basic for java development and buggy at times3
- No built in live Preview3
- Electron3
- Bad Plugin Architecture2
- Powered by Electron2
- Terminal does not identify path vars sometimes1
- Slow C++ Language Server1