StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Java Build Tools
  5. Buck vs Visual Studio Code

Buck vs Visual Studio Code

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Buck
Buck
Stacks27
Followers145
Votes8
GitHub Stars8.6K
Forks1.1K
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Stacks186.5K
Followers169.1K
Votes2.3K
GitHub Stars178.2K
Forks35.9K

Buck vs Visual Studio Code: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between Buck and Visual Studio Code

1. Build System vs. Code Editor: Buck is primarily a build system created by Facebook, while Visual Studio Code is a code editor developed by Microsoft. Buck is designed to automate the build process of large-scale applications, ensuring efficient and consistent builds, while Visual Studio Code provides a comprehensive code editing environment with features like syntax highlighting, debugging, and git integration.

2. Language Support: Buck is language-agnostic and can be used with multiple programming languages, including Java, C++, and Python. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, provides extensive language support with a wide range of extensions and tools specifically tailored for various programming languages, such as JavaScript, Python, and Ruby.

3. Targeted Use Case: Buck is designed to handle complex build requirements and is commonly used for large-scale projects with complex dependencies and codebases. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, is suitable for a wide range of use cases, from small personal projects to large enterprise applications, providing a flexible and customizable development environment.

4. Integration with External Tools and Services: Buck has built-in support for integrating with various external tools and services, such as continuous integration systems, dependency management tools, and code quality analysis tools. Visual Studio Code offers a rich ecosystem of extensions that allow integration with a wide range of tools and services, including linters, test frameworks, version control systems, and cloud platforms.

5. Project Configuration: Buck uses a declarative build configuration file, typically written in a JSON-like format, to define build targets, dependencies, and build rules. Visual Studio Code uses a combination of project-specific configuration files (such as settings.json) and user-specific settings to customize the editor's behavior, including editor preferences, extensions, and keybindings.

6. Collaboration and Code Sharing: Since Buck is primarily focused on building and managing code, it doesn't provide extensive collaboration features. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, offers built-in collaboration features like Live Share, which allows multiple developers to simultaneously work on the same codebase, with real-time editing, debugging, and audio chat capabilities.

In summary, Buck is a specialized build system aimed at large-scale projects, while Visual Studio Code is a versatile code editor with an extensive set of features and language support for various programming languages. While Buck focuses on automating the build process, Visual Studio Code provides a customizable coding environment with collaboration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Buck, Visual Studio Code

Kamaleshwar
Kamaleshwar

Software Engineer at Dibiz Pte. Ltd.

Jul 8, 2020

Decided

Visual Studio Code became famous over the past 3+ years I believe. The clean UI, easy to use UX and the plethora of integrations made it a very easy decision for us. Our gripe with Sublime was probably only the UX side. VSCode has not failed us till now, and still is able to support our development env without any significant effort.

Goland being paid, as well as built only for Go seemed like a significant limitation to not consider it.

1.36M views1.36M
Comments
Simon
Simon

Student at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Jan 9, 2020

Decided

I decided to choose VSCode over Sublime text for my Systems Programming class in C. What I love about VSCode is its awesome ability to add extensions. Intellisense is a beautiful debugger, and Remote SSH allows me to login and make real-time changes in VSCode to files on my university server. This is an awesome alternative to going back and forth on pushing/pulling code and logging into servers in the terminal. Great choice for anyone interested in C programming!

1.29M views1.29M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Buck
Buck
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code

Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.

Speed up your Android builds. Buck builds independent artifacts in parallel to take advantage of multiple cores. Further, it reduces incremental build times by keeping track of unchanged modules so that the minimal set of modules is rebuilt.;Introduce ad-hoc build steps for building artifacts that are not supported out-of-the-box using the standard Ant build scripts for Android.;Keep the logic for generating build rules in the build system instead of requiring a separate system to generate build files.;Generate code-coverage metrics for your unit tests.;Generate an IntelliJ project based on your build rules. This makes Buck ideal for both local development builds in an IDE as well as headless builds on a continuous integration machine.;Make sense of your build dependencie
Combines UI of a modern editor with code assistance and navigation; Integrated debugging experience
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.6K
GitHub Stars
178.2K
GitHub Forks
1.1K
GitHub Forks
35.9K
Stacks
27
Stacks
186.5K
Followers
145
Followers
169.1K
Votes
8
Votes
2.3K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Fast
  • 1
    Windows Support
  • 1
    Runs on OSX
  • 1
    Java
  • 1
    Facebook
Cons
  • 2
    Lack of Documentation
  • 1
    Learning Curve
Pros
  • 341
    Powerful multilanguage IDE
  • 310
    Fast
  • 194
    Front-end develop out of the box
  • 158
    Support TypeScript IntelliSense
  • 142
    Very basic but free
Cons
  • 46
    Slow startup
  • 29
    Resource hog at times
  • 20
    Poor refactoring
  • 14
    Poor UI Designer
  • 11
    Weak Ui design tools
Integrations
Java
Java
Android SDK
Android SDK
Cocoa Touch (iOS)
Cocoa Touch (iOS)
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Buck, Visual Studio Code?

Sublime Text

Sublime Text

Sublime Text is available for OS X, Windows and Linux. One license is all you need to use Sublime Text on every computer you own, no matter what operating system it uses. Sublime Text uses a custom UI toolkit, optimized for speed and beauty, while taking advantage of native functionality on each platform.

Atom

Atom

At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it.

Vim

Vim

Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the de-facto Unix editor 'Vi', with a more complete feature set. Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX systems. Vim is distributed free as charityware.

Notepad++

Notepad++

Notepad++ is a free (as in "free speech" and also as in "free beer") source code editor and Notepad replacement that supports several languages. Running in the MS Windows environment, its use is governed by GPL License.

Apache Maven

Apache Maven

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Emacs

Emacs

GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more. At its core is an interpreter for Emacs Lisp, a dialect of the Lisp programming language with extensions to support text editing.

Gradle

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

Brackets

Brackets

With focused visual tools and preprocessor support, it is a modern text editor that makes it easy to design in the browser.

Neovim

Neovim

Neovim is a project that seeks to aggressively refactor Vim in order to: simplify maintenance and encourage contributions, split the work between multiple developers, enable the implementation of new/modern user interfaces without any modifications to the core source, and improve extensibility with a new plugin architecture.

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana