Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Bazel

305
572
+ 1
133
Buck

27
146
+ 1
8
Pants

23
86
+ 1
30

Bazel vs Buck vs Pants: What are the differences?

Introduction

Bazel, Buck, and Pants are build tools used for building, testing, and deploying software. While they have similarities, there are several key differences between them. Below are the specific differences between Bazel, Buck, and Pants.

  1. Build Language: Bazel uses a custom programming language called Starlark for build configuration, whereas Buck uses a JSON-like build language, and Pants uses a combination of YAML and Python. These different build languages provide varying levels of flexibility and ease of use.

  2. Dependency Management: Bazel and Buck use a fine-grained dependency management system, which means the build system automatically tracks the dependencies of each individual target and only builds what is necessary. In contrast, Pants uses a coarse-grained dependency management system, which means all dependencies of a target are built together, regardless of whether they have changed or not. This can lead to longer build times in Pants compared to Bazel and Buck.

  3. Performance: Bazel is known for its scalability and high performance, especially when dealing with large codebases. It has built-in caching and distributed build capabilities, allowing for faster and parallelized builds. Buck also has good performance but may not scale as well as Bazel for extremely large projects. Pants, on the other hand, focuses more on ease of use and developer productivity, sacrificing some performance optimizations.

  4. Language Support: Bazel has built-in support for multiple programming languages, including Java, C++, Python, and more. It provides a consistent build experience across different languages and frameworks. Buck primarily focuses on providing excellent support for Java and Android projects. Pants, similar to Bazel, supports multiple languages, including Java, Scala, Python, and more.

  5. Community and Adoption: Bazel is backed by Google and has gained significant traction in the industry, especially in large-scale projects and organizations. It has an active and growing community with a wealth of documentation and resources available. Buck, initially developed by Facebook, also has a dedicated community and is widely used in the mobile app development space. Pants, although less popular compared to Bazel and Buck, has a loyal following and is used by several companies and open-source projects.

  6. Ease of Configuration: Bazel has a steep learning curve and requires a good understanding of its build language and concepts. It may take some time for developers to become proficient in configuring Bazel properly. Buck, on the other hand, has a simpler build language and is relatively easier to configure. Pants strikes a balance between the two, offering a more approachable configuration experience while still providing flexibility and powerful features.

In Summary, Bazel, Buck, and Pants differ in their build languages, dependency management systems, performance, language support, community adoption, and ease of configuration, catering to different needs and preferences in software development.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Bazel
Pros of Buck
Pros of Pants
  • 28
    Fast
  • 20
    Deterministic incremental builds
  • 17
    Correct
  • 16
    Multi-language
  • 14
    Enforces declared inputs/outputs
  • 10
    High-level build language
  • 9
    Scalable
  • 5
    Multi-platform support
  • 5
    Sandboxing
  • 4
    Dependency management
  • 2
    Windows Support
  • 2
    Flexible
  • 1
    Android Studio integration
  • 4
    Fast
  • 1
    Java
  • 1
    Facebook
  • 1
    Runs on OSX
  • 1
    Windows Support
  • 6
    Creates deployable packages
  • 4
    Runs on Linux
  • 4
    Runs on OS X
  • 4
    BUILD files
  • 4
    Runs tests
  • 4
    Scales
  • 2
    Flexibility
  • 2
    Extensible

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Bazel
Cons of Buck
Cons of Pants
  • 3
    No Windows Support
  • 2
    Bad IntelliJ support
  • 1
    Poor windows support for some languages
  • 1
    Constant breaking changes
  • 1
    Learning Curve
  • 1
    Lack of Documentation
  • 2
    Lack of Documentation
  • 1
    Learning Curve
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Bazel?

    Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

    What is Buck?

    Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

    What is Pants?

    Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Bazel?
    What companies use Buck?
    What companies use Pants?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Bazel?
    What tools integrate with Buck?
    What tools integrate with Pants?
      No integrations found

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      Mar 24 2021 at 12:57PM

      Pinterest

      GitJenkinsKafka+7
      3
      2211
      GitJenkinsGroovy+4
      4
      2806
      Apache MesosApache AuroraPants+3
      2
      1684
      What are some alternatives to Bazel, Buck, and Pants?
      Webpack
      A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.
      Ansible
      Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.
      CMake
      It is used to control the software compilation process using simple platform and compiler independent configuration files, and generate native makefiles and workspaces that can be used in the compiler environment of the user's choice.
      Jenkins
      In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
      Apache Maven
      Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.
      See all alternatives