StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Java Build Tools
  5. Bazel vs Buck vs Pants

Bazel vs Buck vs Pants

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Pants
Pants
Stacks23
Followers86
Votes30
GitHub Stars3.7K
Forks674
Bazel
Bazel
Stacks314
Followers579
Votes133
Buck
Buck
Stacks27
Followers145
Votes8
GitHub Stars8.6K
Forks1.1K

Bazel vs Buck vs Pants: What are the differences?

Introduction

Bazel, Buck, and Pants are build tools used for building, testing, and deploying software. While they have similarities, there are several key differences between them. Below are the specific differences between Bazel, Buck, and Pants.

  1. Build Language: Bazel uses a custom programming language called Starlark for build configuration, whereas Buck uses a JSON-like build language, and Pants uses a combination of YAML and Python. These different build languages provide varying levels of flexibility and ease of use.

  2. Dependency Management: Bazel and Buck use a fine-grained dependency management system, which means the build system automatically tracks the dependencies of each individual target and only builds what is necessary. In contrast, Pants uses a coarse-grained dependency management system, which means all dependencies of a target are built together, regardless of whether they have changed or not. This can lead to longer build times in Pants compared to Bazel and Buck.

  3. Performance: Bazel is known for its scalability and high performance, especially when dealing with large codebases. It has built-in caching and distributed build capabilities, allowing for faster and parallelized builds. Buck also has good performance but may not scale as well as Bazel for extremely large projects. Pants, on the other hand, focuses more on ease of use and developer productivity, sacrificing some performance optimizations.

  4. Language Support: Bazel has built-in support for multiple programming languages, including Java, C++, Python, and more. It provides a consistent build experience across different languages and frameworks. Buck primarily focuses on providing excellent support for Java and Android projects. Pants, similar to Bazel, supports multiple languages, including Java, Scala, Python, and more.

  5. Community and Adoption: Bazel is backed by Google and has gained significant traction in the industry, especially in large-scale projects and organizations. It has an active and growing community with a wealth of documentation and resources available. Buck, initially developed by Facebook, also has a dedicated community and is widely used in the mobile app development space. Pants, although less popular compared to Bazel and Buck, has a loyal following and is used by several companies and open-source projects.

  6. Ease of Configuration: Bazel has a steep learning curve and requires a good understanding of its build language and concepts. It may take some time for developers to become proficient in configuring Bazel properly. Buck, on the other hand, has a simpler build language and is relatively easier to configure. Pants strikes a balance between the two, offering a more approachable configuration experience while still providing flexibility and powerful features.

In Summary, Bazel, Buck, and Pants differ in their build languages, dependency management systems, performance, language support, community adoption, and ease of configuration, catering to different needs and preferences in software development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Pants
Pants
Bazel
Bazel
Buck
Buck

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

Builds Java, Scala, and Python.;Adding support for new languages is straightforward.;Supports code generation: thrift, protocol buffers, custom code generators.;Resolves external JVM and Python dependencies.;Runs tests.;Spawns Python and Scala REPLs with appropriate load paths.;Creates deployable packages.;Scales to large repos with many interdependent modules.;Designed for incremental builds.;Support for local and distributed caching.;Especially fast for Scala builds, compared to alternatives.;Builds standalone python executables (PEX files);Has a plugin system to add custom features and override stock behavior.;Runs on Linux and Mac OS X.
Multi-language support: Bazel supports Java, Objective-C and C++ out of the box, and can be extended to support arbitrary programming languages;High-level build language: Projects are described in the BUILD language, a concise text format that describes a project as sets of small interconnected libraries, binaries and tests. By contrast, with tools like Make you have to describe individual files and compiler invocations;Multi-platform support: The same tool and the same BUILD files can be used to build software for different architectures, and even different platforms. At Google, we use Bazel to build both server applications running on systems in our data centers and client apps running on mobile phones;Reproducibility: In BUILD files, each library, test, and binary must specify its direct dependencies completely. Bazel uses this dependency information to know what must be rebuilt when you make changes to a source file, and which tasks can run in parallel. This means that all builds are incremental and will always produce the same result;Scalable: Bazel can handle large builds
Speed up your Android builds. Buck builds independent artifacts in parallel to take advantage of multiple cores. Further, it reduces incremental build times by keeping track of unchanged modules so that the minimal set of modules is rebuilt.;Introduce ad-hoc build steps for building artifacts that are not supported out-of-the-box using the standard Ant build scripts for Android.;Keep the logic for generating build rules in the build system instead of requiring a separate system to generate build files.;Generate code-coverage metrics for your unit tests.;Generate an IntelliJ project based on your build rules. This makes Buck ideal for both local development builds in an IDE as well as headless builds on a continuous integration machine.;Make sense of your build dependencie
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.6K
GitHub Forks
674
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
23
Stacks
314
Stacks
27
Followers
86
Followers
579
Followers
145
Votes
30
Votes
133
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Creates deployable packages
  • 4
    Scales
  • 4
    Runs on Linux
  • 4
    Runs on OS X
  • 4
    BUILD files
Pros
  • 28
    Fast
  • 20
    Deterministic incremental builds
  • 17
    Correct
  • 16
    Multi-language
  • 14
    Enforces declared inputs/outputs
Cons
  • 3
    No Windows Support
  • 2
    Bad IntelliJ support
  • 1
    Learning Curve
  • 1
    Lack of Documentation
  • 1
    Constant breaking changes
Pros
  • 4
    Fast
  • 1
    Runs on OSX
  • 1
    Java
  • 1
    Facebook
  • 1
    Windows Support
Cons
  • 2
    Lack of Documentation
  • 1
    Learning Curve
Integrations
No integrations available
Java
Java
Objective-C
Objective-C
C++
C++
Java
Java
Android SDK
Android SDK
Cocoa Touch (iOS)
Cocoa Touch (iOS)

What are some alternatives to Pants, Bazel, Buck?

Apache Maven

Apache Maven

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Gradle

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

JitPack

JitPack

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

SBT

SBT

It is similar to Java's Maven and Ant. Its main features are: Native support for compiling Scala code and integrating with many Scala test frameworks.

Apache Ant

Apache Ant

Ant is a Java-based build tool. In theory, it is kind of like Make, without Make's wrinkles and with the full portability of pure Java code.

Please

Please

Please is a cross-language build system with an emphasis on high performance, extensibility and reproduceability. It supports a number of popular languages and can automate nearly any aspect of your build process.

CMake

CMake

It is used to control the software compilation process using simple platform and compiler independent configuration files, and generate native makefiles and workspaces that can be used in the compiler environment of the user's choice.

Sonatype Nexus

Sonatype Nexus

It is an open source repository that supports many artifact formats, including Docker, Java™ and npm. With the Nexus tool integration, pipelines in your toolchain can publish and retrieve versioned apps and their dependencies

JFrog Artifactory

JFrog Artifactory

It integrates with your existing ecosystem supporting end-to-end binary management that overcomes the complexity of working with different software package management systems, and provides consistency to your CI/CD workflow.

EventBus

EventBus

It enables central communication to decoupled classes with just a few lines of code – simplifying the code, removing dependencies, and speeding up app development.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana