StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Java Build Tools
  5. Bazel vs Buck vs Gradle

Bazel vs Buck vs Gradle

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gradle
Gradle
Stacks24.3K
Followers9.8K
Votes254
GitHub Stars18.1K
Forks5.0K
Bazel
Bazel
Stacks314
Followers579
Votes133
Buck
Buck
Stacks27
Followers145
Votes8
GitHub Stars8.6K
Forks1.1K

Bazel vs Buck vs Gradle: What are the differences?

  1. 1. Purpose and Language Support: Bazel is an open-source build tool that focuses on providing fast and reliable builds for large-scale projects. It supports multiple languages including Java, C++, Python, Go, and more. On the other hand, Buck is also an open-source build tool designed for fast and incremental builds. It primarily focuses on Android and iOS development, providing optimized builds for these platforms. Gradle is a build automation tool that aims to be highly flexible and supports a wide range of languages and platforms.

  2. 2. Build Configuration: Bazel uses a declarative and statically-typed build language called Starlark, allowing for more precise and deterministic builds. It provides a build graph that is defined in a BUILD file, allowing developers to specify dependencies between targets. Buck, on the other hand, uses a simplified version of the Python language for build configuration. It also defines dependencies using BUILD files but supports a more intuitive and flexible syntax. Gradle uses a Groovy-based DSL (Domain-Specific Language) or Kotlin for build configuration. It offers a more expressive and flexible syntax compared to Bazel and Buck.

  3. 3. Build Performance: Bazel has a strong emphasis on build performance and is designed to provide fast and incremental builds. It achieves this by caching build artifacts and using advanced dependency analysis. Buck, being specifically optimized for Android and iOS development, also offers fast and incremental builds. It supports fine-grained build caching and parallelization. Gradle, although it provides good build performance, may not be as fast as Bazel or Buck for larger projects. However, it offers a wide range of features and plugins, making it highly customizable for different build scenarios.

  4. 4. Plugin Ecosystem: Bazel has a limited number of plugins and extensions compared to Gradle. Its plugin ecosystem is still developing and may not have the same level of community support as Gradle. However, it provides a strong foundation for building scalable and reproducible builds. Buck also has a smaller plugin ecosystem compared to Gradle but still provides essential features for Android and iOS development. Gradle, being one of the most widely used build tools, has a rich and active plugin ecosystem. It offers a vast range of plugins for different languages, frameworks, and tools, making it highly extensible.

  5. 5. Integration and IDE Support: Bazel provides seamless integration with popular IDEs such as IntelliJ IDEA and Visual Studio Code, offering features like code navigation, refactoring, and debugging. It also supports integration with Continuous Integration (CI) systems like Jenkins and Travis CI. Buck provides similar integration with IDEs and CI systems, focusing on Android and iOS development. Gradle, being widely adopted, offers excellent integration with IDEs such as IntelliJ IDEA, Android Studio, and Eclipse. It also provides comprehensive support for CI systems and cloud-based build services.

  6. 6. Community and Support: Bazel has a growing and active community but may not have the same level of support as Gradle. It is supported by Google and has a dedicated team working on its development. Buck also has an active community, primarily focusing on Android and iOS development. It is supported by Facebook and has ongoing development efforts. Gradle, being widely adopted and backed by Gradle Inc., has a large and vibrant community. It has extensive documentation, tutorials, and user forums, making it easier to find support and resources.

In Summary, Bazel, Buck, and Gradle are all powerful build tools with their own strengths. Bazel is highly scalable and delivers fast and reproducible builds for large-scale projects. Buck provides optimized builds for Android and iOS development. Gradle offers a flexible and extensible build automation solution with a wide range of language and platform support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Gradle
Gradle
Bazel
Bazel
Buck
Buck

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

Declarative builds and build-by-convention;Language for dependency based programming;Structure your build;Deep API;Gradle scales;Multi-project builds;Many ways to manage your dependencies;Gradle is the first build integration tool
Multi-language support: Bazel supports Java, Objective-C and C++ out of the box, and can be extended to support arbitrary programming languages;High-level build language: Projects are described in the BUILD language, a concise text format that describes a project as sets of small interconnected libraries, binaries and tests. By contrast, with tools like Make you have to describe individual files and compiler invocations;Multi-platform support: The same tool and the same BUILD files can be used to build software for different architectures, and even different platforms. At Google, we use Bazel to build both server applications running on systems in our data centers and client apps running on mobile phones;Reproducibility: In BUILD files, each library, test, and binary must specify its direct dependencies completely. Bazel uses this dependency information to know what must be rebuilt when you make changes to a source file, and which tasks can run in parallel. This means that all builds are incremental and will always produce the same result;Scalable: Bazel can handle large builds
Speed up your Android builds. Buck builds independent artifacts in parallel to take advantage of multiple cores. Further, it reduces incremental build times by keeping track of unchanged modules so that the minimal set of modules is rebuilt.;Introduce ad-hoc build steps for building artifacts that are not supported out-of-the-box using the standard Ant build scripts for Android.;Keep the logic for generating build rules in the build system instead of requiring a separate system to generate build files.;Generate code-coverage metrics for your unit tests.;Generate an IntelliJ project based on your build rules. This makes Buck ideal for both local development builds in an IDE as well as headless builds on a continuous integration machine.;Make sense of your build dependencie
Statistics
GitHub Stars
18.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.6K
GitHub Forks
5.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
24.3K
Stacks
314
Stacks
27
Followers
9.8K
Followers
579
Followers
145
Votes
254
Votes
133
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 110
    Flexibility
  • 51
    Easy to use
  • 47
    Groovy dsl
  • 22
    Slow build time
  • 10
    Crazy memory leaks
Cons
  • 8
    Inactionnable documentation
  • 6
    It is just the mess of Ant++
  • 4
    Hard to decide: ten or more ways to achieve one goal
  • 2
    Dependency on groovy
  • 2
    Bad Eclipse tooling
Pros
  • 28
    Fast
  • 20
    Deterministic incremental builds
  • 17
    Correct
  • 16
    Multi-language
  • 14
    Enforces declared inputs/outputs
Cons
  • 3
    No Windows Support
  • 2
    Bad IntelliJ support
  • 1
    Learning Curve
  • 1
    Constant breaking changes
  • 1
    Poor windows support for some languages
Pros
  • 4
    Fast
  • 1
    Windows Support
  • 1
    Runs on OSX
  • 1
    Java
  • 1
    Facebook
Cons
  • 2
    Lack of Documentation
  • 1
    Learning Curve
Integrations
No integrations available
Java
Java
Objective-C
Objective-C
C++
C++
Java
Java
Android SDK
Android SDK
Cocoa Touch (iOS)
Cocoa Touch (iOS)

What are some alternatives to Gradle, Bazel, Buck?

Apache Maven

Apache Maven

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Pants

Pants

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

JitPack

JitPack

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

SBT

SBT

It is similar to Java's Maven and Ant. Its main features are: Native support for compiling Scala code and integrating with many Scala test frameworks.

Apache Ant

Apache Ant

Ant is a Java-based build tool. In theory, it is kind of like Make, without Make's wrinkles and with the full portability of pure Java code.

Please

Please

Please is a cross-language build system with an emphasis on high performance, extensibility and reproduceability. It supports a number of popular languages and can automate nearly any aspect of your build process.

CMake

CMake

It is used to control the software compilation process using simple platform and compiler independent configuration files, and generate native makefiles and workspaces that can be used in the compiler environment of the user's choice.

Sonatype Nexus

Sonatype Nexus

It is an open source repository that supports many artifact formats, including Docker, Java™ and npm. With the Nexus tool integration, pipelines in your toolchain can publish and retrieve versioned apps and their dependencies

JFrog Artifactory

JFrog Artifactory

It integrates with your existing ecosystem supporting end-to-end binary management that overcomes the complexity of working with different software package management systems, and provides consistency to your CI/CD workflow.

EventBus

EventBus

It enables central communication to decoupled classes with just a few lines of code – simplifying the code, removing dependencies, and speeding up app development.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana