Buddy vs Rancher

Overview

Rancher

Stacks952

Followers1.5K

Votes644

Buddy

Stacks293

Followers348

Votes606

Buddy vs Rancher: What are the differences?

Deployment Orchestration: Rancher focuses on managing Kubernetes clusters and provides a comprehensive set of tools for cluster administration and monitoring. In contrast, Buddy offers a platform for continuous integration and deployment, allowing developers to automate their deployment processes without needing to manage clusters.
User Interface: Rancher provides a visually appealing and intuitive web interface for managing clusters and resources, while Buddy primarily focuses on a streamlined and developer-friendly interface for configuring pipelines and workflows.
Supported Integrations: Rancher supports a wide range of cloud providers and infrastructure services for seamless integration, while Buddy offers a variety of integrations with popular version control systems and developer tools to streamline the development workflow.
Scalability: Rancher is designed for managing large-scale production environments with multiple clusters and nodes, providing advanced features for scalability and high availability. On the other hand, Buddy is more suitable for small to medium-sized teams looking to automate their deployment pipelines.
Community Support: Rancher has a strong and active community of users and contributors, providing extensive documentation, forums, and resources for troubleshooting and knowledge sharing. In comparison, Buddy offers dedicated support and assistance to its users through its customer service channels.
Cost Structure: Rancher is an open-source platform with community and enterprise editions, offering flexible pricing options based on support levels and additional features. In contrast, Buddy follows a subscription-based model with tiered pricing plans based on the number of users and pipelines.

In Summary, when choosing between Buddy and Rancher, consider factors such as deployment orchestration, user interface, supported integrations, scalability, community support, and cost structure to determine the best fit for your development needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Rancher	Buddy
Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.	Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.
Manage Hosts, Deploy Containers, Monitor Resources;User Management & Collaboration;Native Docker APIs & Tools;Monitoring and Logging;Connect Containers, Manage Disks, Deploy Load Balancers;Docker App Catalog; Included Kubernetes Distribution;Included Docker Swarm Distribution; Included Mesos Distribution;Infrastructure Management	Automatic deployments on push to branch;Docker-based builds and tests;10-minute setup of complete environment;Integrates with GitHub, Bitbucket & GitLab;DevOps and website monitoring actions;Clear and telling UI/UX;Supports all popular languages and frameworks, including PHP/Laravel, Node.js, Rails, Python, Java, .NET Core, Elixir and Go
Statistics
Stacks 952	Stacks 293
Followers 1.5K	Followers 348
Votes 644	Votes 606
Pros & Cons
Pros 103 Easy to use 79 Open source and totally free 63 Multi-host docker-compose support 58 Simple 58 Load balancing and health check included Cons 10 Hosting Rancher can be complicated	Pros 56 Easy setup 53 Docker 50 Continuous Integration 49 Integrations 46 Beautiful dashboard Cons 1 Deleted account after 1 month of not pushing code
Integrations
Jenkins Datadog Google Compute Engine Docker Compose Amazon EC2 DigitalOcean GitHub Docker Kubernetes Drone.io	Jekyll Grunt Microsoft Azure Kubernetes Hexo Amazon EC2 Meteor Slack .NET Ruby

What are some alternatives to Rancher, Buddy?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

AWS CodePipeline

CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.

Deployer

A deployment tool written in PHP with support for popular frameworks out of the box

Related Comparisons

Buddy vs Rancher: What are the differences?

Deployment Orchestration: Rancher focuses on managing Kubernetes clusters and provides a comprehensive set of tools for cluster administration and monitoring. In contrast, Buddy offers a platform for continuous integration and deployment, allowing developers to automate their deployment processes without needing to manage clusters.
User Interface: Rancher provides a visually appealing and intuitive web interface for managing clusters and resources, while Buddy primarily focuses on a streamlined and developer-friendly interface for configuring pipelines and workflows.
Supported Integrations: Rancher supports a wide range of cloud providers and infrastructure services for seamless integration, while Buddy offers a variety of integrations with popular version control systems and developer tools to streamline the development workflow.
Scalability: Rancher is designed for managing large-scale production environments with multiple clusters and nodes, providing advanced features for scalability and high availability. On the other hand, Buddy is more suitable for small to medium-sized teams looking to automate their deployment pipelines.
Community Support: Rancher has a strong and active community of users and contributors, providing extensive documentation, forums, and resources for troubleshooting and knowledge sharing. In comparison, Buddy offers dedicated support and assistance to its users through its customer service channels.
Cost Structure: Rancher is an open-source platform with community and enterprise editions, offering flexible pricing options based on support levels and additional features. In contrast, Buddy follows a subscription-based model with tiered pricing plans based on the number of users and pipelines.

Buddy vs Rancher

Overview