Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Buffer

649
318
+ 1
101
Stacker

16
17
+ 1
0
Add tool

Buffer vs Stacker: What are the differences?

# Introduction
When it comes to social media management and scheduling tools, Buffer and Stacker are two popular choices that offer similar functionalities. However, there are key differences that set them apart from each other.

1. **Integration Capabilities**: Buffer provides integration with more than 60 platforms, including popular ones like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, offering a wider reach for social media posts. On the other hand, Stacker has fewer integration options, focusing more on in-depth analytics and reporting features.

2. **Automation Features**: Buffer offers automated scheduling based on best times to post and audience engagement metrics, making it ideal for a hands-off approach to social media management. Stacker, on the other hand, allows for more manual control over scheduling and posts, providing a more customized approach.

3. **Analytics Depth**: Stacker offers more detailed analytics and reporting features, allowing users to track performance metrics across different platforms and campaigns with advanced insights. Buffer also provides analytics but may not offer the same level of depth as Stacker.

4. **Content Collaboration**: Buffer allows team members to collaborate on content creation, scheduling, and monitoring, offering a seamless workflow for social media teams. Stacker, while it also supports team collaboration, focuses more on individual analytics and reporting features.

5. **Mobile App Experience**: Buffer offers a user-friendly and robust mobile app experience, allowing users to manage and schedule social media posts on the go with ease. Stacker, while it does have a mobile app, may not offer the same level of functionality and ease of use as Buffer.

6. **Pricing Structure**: Buffer offers tiered pricing plans based on the number of social accounts and team members, making it suitable for both individual users and large teams. Stacker, on the other hand, may have a more rigid pricing structure that may not be as flexible for all types of users.

In Summary, Buffer and Stacker differ in integration capabilities, automation features, analytics depth, content collaboration, mobile app experience, and pricing structure, catering to different preferences and needs in social media management tools.
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Buffer
Pros of Stacker
  • 50
    Super simple to schedule tweets
  • 24
    Buffer from my browser; integrates with my work flow
  • 9
    Awesome UI
  • 6
    Fair pricing
  • 4
    Weekly analytics report email
  • 3
    Re-buffer posts
  • 2
    Mobile App
  • 1
    Schedule tweets via API
  • 1
    Pablo for images
  • 1
    Easy to visualise time line
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Buffer
    Cons of Stacker
    • 1
      Re-buffering a lot of tweets is pretty painful
    • 1
      Mobile app could use some work
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      476
      47.5K
      7.1K
      90
      25

      What is Buffer?

      Buffer helps you manage multiple social media accounts at once. Quickly schedule content from anywhere on the web, collaborate with team members, and analyze rich statistics on how your posts perform.

      What is Stacker?

      Stacker is the Easiest way to Publish & Reply on Social Media.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Buffer?
      What companies use Stacker?
        No companies found
        Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
        Learn More

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with Buffer?
        What tools integrate with Stacker?
          No integrations found

          Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

          What are some alternatives to Buffer and Stacker?
          Sprout Social
          It is a social media management tool created to help businesses grow their social media presence. You can understand and reach your audience, engage your community and measure performance with the only all-in-one social media management platform built for connection.
          Hootsuite
          It manages all your social media in one place. From finding prospects to serving customers, it helps you do more with your social media. The system's user interface takes the form of a dashboard, and supports social network integrations.
          Stream
          Stream allows you to build scalable feeds, activity streams, and chat. Stream’s simple, yet powerful API’s and SDKs are used by some of the largest and most popular applications for feeds and chat. SDKs available for most popular languages.
          WordPress
          The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.
          Google AdSense
          It is a program run by Google through which website publishers in the Google Network of content sites serve text, images, video, or interactive media advertisements that are targeted to the site content and audience.
          See all alternatives