StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Bugzilla vs GitHub

Bugzilla vs GitHub

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub
GitHub
Stacks295.6K
Followers259.0K
Votes10.4K
Bugzilla
Bugzilla
Stacks91
Followers126
Votes7

Bugzilla vs GitHub: What are the differences?

Bugzilla vs GitHub

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Workflow Management**: Bugzilla is primarily a bug tracking system used for issue management, while GitHub is a version control system that includes issue tracking. Bugzilla focuses on tracking bugs with its workflow built around bug reporting, tracking, and resolution. In contrast, GitHub's workflow revolves around version control, code collaboration, and issue tracking within the Git ecosystem.
2. **Community Engagement**: Bugzilla is an open-source bug tracking system that allows community involvement in issue reporting and resolution. GitHub, on the other hand, offers a more integrated platform for developers with features like pull requests, code reviews, and project management tools, enhancing community engagement and collaboration on code development.
3. **Integration with Git**: GitHub is tightly integrated with Git, a distributed version control system, making it seamless for developers to manage code repositories and collaborate on projects. Bugzilla, on the other hand, does not have the same level of integration with Git, making it less suitable for projects heavily dependent on version control.
4. **User Interface**: GitHub provides a modern and user-friendly interface that simplifies code collaboration, issue tracking, and project management. Bugzilla, on the other hand, has a more traditional and utilitarian interface focused on bug tracking and resolution, lacking some of the advanced features and design elements found in GitHub.
5. **Support for Agile Development**: GitHub offers features like project boards and milestones that are well-suited for Agile development methodologies, allowing teams to manage sprints and track progress effectively. Bugzilla lacks these specific Agile-focused tools, making it less ideal for teams following Agile practices.
6. **Third-party Integrations**: GitHub has a wide range of third-party integrations with tools like Slack, Jenkins, and Trello, enhancing its functionality and enabling seamless workflow automation. Bugzilla, while extensible through plugins and customizations, may not offer the same level of integration with external tools as GitHub.

In Summary, Bugzilla and GitHub differ in their primary focus, community engagement, integration with Git, user interface, support for Agile development, and third-party integrations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitHub, Bugzilla

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub
GitHub
Bugzilla
Bugzilla

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bugzilla is a "Defect Tracking System" or "Bug-Tracking System". Defect Tracking Systems allow individual or groups of developers to keep track of outstanding bugs in their product effectively. Most commercial defect-tracking software vendors charge enormous licensing fees. Despite being "free", Bugzilla has many features its expensive counterparts lack.

Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions
Optimized database structure for increased performance and scalability;Excellent security to protect confidentiality;Advanced query tool that can remember your searches;Integrated email capabilities;Editable user profiles and comprehensive email preferences;Comprehensive permissions system;Proven under fire as Mozilla's bug tracking system;
Statistics
Stacks
295.6K
Stacks
91
Followers
259.0K
Followers
126
Votes
10.4K
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1773
    Open source friendly
  • 1463
    Easy source control
  • 1254
    Nice UI
  • 1137
    Great for team collaboration
  • 868
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 56
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 38
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
Pros
  • 2
    Detailed
  • 2
    Free
  • 2
    Open source
  • 1
    Easy to use
Integrations
Grove
Grove
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Airbrake
Airbrake
Codeship
Codeship
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
BugHerd
BugHerd
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
HipChat
HipChat
CopperEgg
CopperEgg
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to GitHub, Bugzilla?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Jira

Jira

Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana