Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Bugzilla vs GitHub: What are the differences?
Bugzilla vs GitHub
<Write Introduction here>
1. **Workflow Management**: Bugzilla is primarily a bug tracking system used for issue management, while GitHub is a version control system that includes issue tracking. Bugzilla focuses on tracking bugs with its workflow built around bug reporting, tracking, and resolution. In contrast, GitHub's workflow revolves around version control, code collaboration, and issue tracking within the Git ecosystem.
2. **Community Engagement**: Bugzilla is an open-source bug tracking system that allows community involvement in issue reporting and resolution. GitHub, on the other hand, offers a more integrated platform for developers with features like pull requests, code reviews, and project management tools, enhancing community engagement and collaboration on code development.
3. **Integration with Git**: GitHub is tightly integrated with Git, a distributed version control system, making it seamless for developers to manage code repositories and collaborate on projects. Bugzilla, on the other hand, does not have the same level of integration with Git, making it less suitable for projects heavily dependent on version control.
4. **User Interface**: GitHub provides a modern and user-friendly interface that simplifies code collaboration, issue tracking, and project management. Bugzilla, on the other hand, has a more traditional and utilitarian interface focused on bug tracking and resolution, lacking some of the advanced features and design elements found in GitHub.
5. **Support for Agile Development**: GitHub offers features like project boards and milestones that are well-suited for Agile development methodologies, allowing teams to manage sprints and track progress effectively. Bugzilla lacks these specific Agile-focused tools, making it less ideal for teams following Agile practices.
6. **Third-party Integrations**: GitHub has a wide range of third-party integrations with tools like Slack, Jenkins, and Trello, enhancing its functionality and enabling seamless workflow automation. Bugzilla, while extensible through plugins and customizations, may not offer the same level of integration with external tools as GitHub.
In Summary, Bugzilla and GitHub differ in their primary focus, community engagement, integration with Git, user interface, support for Agile development, and third-party integrations.
Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?
If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:
- Pick the correct target branch
- Make Drafts explicit
- Name things properly
- Ask help for tools
- Remove the noise
- Fetch necessary data
- Understand Mergeability
- Pass the message
- Add screenshots
- Be found in the future
- Comment inline in your changes
Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D
What else do you review before asking for code review?
Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.
SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.
As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?
One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.
It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.
Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.
Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!
At DeployPlace we use self-hosted GitLab, we have chosen GitLab as most of us are familiar with it. We are happy with all features GitLab provides, I can’t imagine our life without integrated GitLab CI. Another important feature for us is integrated code review tool, we use it every day, we use merge requests, code reviews, branching. To be honest, most of us have GitHub accounts as well, we like to contribute in open source, and we want to be a part of the tech community, but lack of solutions from GitHub in the area of CI doesn’t let us chose it for our projects.