StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Search
  4. Search Engines
  5. Centrify vs Sphinx

Centrify vs Sphinx

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sphinx
Sphinx
Stacks1.1K
Followers300
Votes32
Centrify
Centrify
Stacks12
Followers31
Votes0

Centrify vs Sphinx: What are the differences?

# Introduction

1. **Integration with Active Directory**: Centrify specializes in seamless integration with Active Directory, providing centralized management of user identities across various platforms. In contrast, Sphinx lacks built-in support for Active Directory integration, making it less suitable for organizations heavily reliant on Active Directory for user management.
   
2. **Scalability**: Centrify offers robust scalability features, allowing organizations to easily expand their user base and resource access without compromising security or performance. On the other hand, Sphinx may face limitations in terms of scalability, especially in large enterprise environments with complex infrastructures. 

3. **Multi-factor Authentication Capabilities**: Centrify provides advanced multi-factor authentication capabilities, enhancing security through additional layers of identity verification. Meanwhile, Sphinx may have basic or limited support for multi-factor authentication, potentially exposing organizations to increased security risks.

4. **Cloud Support**: Centrify is known for its seamless integration with cloud platforms, enabling organizations to securely manage user identities and access controls in cloud environments. In comparison, Sphinx may lack comprehensive cloud support, restricting its usability in hybrid or cloud-centric IT infrastructures.

5. **Comprehensive Audit and Reporting Features**: Centrify offers extensive audit and reporting features, allowing organizations to track user activities, monitor security events, and generate compliance reports effortlessly. In contrast, Sphinx may have limited or less sophisticated audit and reporting capabilities, hindering organizations' ability to maintain strict security and compliance standards.

6. **Mobile Device Management Integration**: Centrify provides robust integration with mobile device management solutions, enabling organizations to manage user access and security policies on mobile devices effectively. In contrast, Sphinx may have limited support for mobile device management integration, potentially compromising the overall security posture in mobile-driven environments.

In Summary, the key differences between Centrify and Sphinx lie in their Active Directory integration, scalability, multi-factor authentication capabilities, cloud support, audit and reporting features, and mobile device management integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Sphinx
Sphinx
Centrify
Centrify

It lets you either batch index and search data stored in an SQL database, NoSQL storage, or just files quickly and easily — or index and search data on the fly, working with it pretty much as with a database server.

It is privileged identity management and identity as a service solutions stop the breach by securing access to hybrid enterprises through the power of identity services.

Output formats: HTML (including Windows HTML Help), LaTeX (for printable PDF versions), ePub, Texinfo, manual pages, plain text;Extensive cross-references: semantic markup and automatic links for functions, classes, citations, glossary terms and similar pieces of information;Hierarchical structure: easy definition of a document tree, with automatic links to siblings, parents and children;Automatic indices: general index as well as a language-specific module indices;Code handling: automatic highlighting using the Pygments highlighter;Extensions: automatic testing of code snippets, inclusion of docstrings from Python modules (API docs), and more
Single sign-on; Automated account management; Multi-factor authentication; Enterprise mobility management; Mac management; Secure remote access; Shared account password management; Privileged management.
Statistics
Stacks
1.1K
Stacks
12
Followers
300
Followers
31
Votes
32
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 16
    Fast
  • 9
    Simple deployment
  • 6
    Open source
  • 1
    Lots of extentions
No community feedback yet
Integrations
DevDocs
DevDocs
Zapier
Zapier
Google Drive
Google Drive
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
Dropbox
Dropbox
Sentry
Sentry
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Rafay Systems
Rafay Systems
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
Mingle
Mingle

What are some alternatives to Sphinx, Centrify?

bitwarden

bitwarden

bitwarden is the easiest and safest way to store and sync your passwords across all of your devices.

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

LastPass

LastPass

LastPass Enterprise offers your employees and admins a single, unified experience that combines the power of SAML SSO coupled with enterprise-class password vaulting. LastPass is your first line of defense in the battle to protect your digital assets from the significant risks associated with employee password re-use and phishing.

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Passbolt

Passbolt

Passbolt is an open source password manager for teams. It allows to securely store and share credentials, and is based on OpenPGP.

KeePass

KeePass

It is an open source password manager. Passwords can be stored in highly-encrypted databases, which can be unlocked with one master password or key file.

KeePassXC

KeePassXC

It is a cross-platform community-driven port of the Windows application “Keepass Password Safe”. It can store your passwords safely and auto-type them into your everyday websites and applications.

1Password

1Password

Lock credentials and secrets in vaults that sync across systems and seamlessly access within your dev, CI/CD, and production environments. Plus, generate and use SSH keys directly from 1Password, automate infrastructure secrets, and more.

Dashlane

Dashlane

Dashlane is a password manager and online security app for everyone who lives, works, and plays on the internet.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope